Abstract
This contribution considers the evolution of a dimorphism with respect to cell fusion characteristics in a population of primitive cells. These cells reproduce exclusively asexually. The evolution towards asymmetric fusion behaviour of cells is driven by selection promoting horizontal transfer of an endosymbiontic replicator. It is concluded that evolution of asymmetric cell fusion in this scenario is more likely than evolution of sexual differentiation in a sexually reproducing population. Pre-existing dimorphism with respect to cell fusion may thus have been the basis for the establishment of sexual differentiation at the level of gamete fusion, and this in turn is fundamental to the evolution of two different sexes, male and female.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Galloway R. E. and Goodenough U. W. 1985 Genetic analysis of mating locus linked mutations inChlamydomonas reinhardii.Genetics 111: 447–461
Goodenough U. W., Hwang C. J. and Warren A. J. 1978 Sex-limited expression of gene loci controlling flagellar membrane agglutination in theChlamydomonas mating reaction.Genetics 89: 235–243
Hickey D. H. 1982a Selfish DNA: a sexually transmitted nuclear parasite.Genetics 101: 519–531
Hoekstra R. F. 1982b On the asymmetry of sex: evolution of mating types in isogamous populations.J. Theor. Biol. 98: 427–451
Hoekstra R. F. 1987 The evolution of sexes. In The evolution of sex and its consequences (ed.) S. C. Stearns (Basel: Birkhauser) pp. 59–91
Hoekstra R. F., Iwasa Y. and Weissing F. 1990 The origin of isogamous sexual differentiation. InEvolution and game dynamics (ed.) R. Selten (Berlin: Springer-Verlag) vol. 1 (in press)
Rose M. R. 1983 The contagion mechanisra for the origin of sex.J. Theor. Biol. 101: 137–146
Wiese L. 1976 Genetic aspects of sexuality in Volvocales. InThe genetics of Algae (ed.) R. A. Lewin (Oxford: Blackwell) pp. 174–197
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoekstra, R.F. The evolution of male-female dimorphism: Older than sex?. J. Genet. 69, 11–15 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02931663
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02931663