Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Elite versus mass sociology: An elaboration on Sociology's Academic Caste System

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Agger, B. 1989. “Do Books Write Authors? A Study of Disciplinary Hegemony,”Teaching Sociology 17(3): 365–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. 1987.Twenty Lectures: Sociological Theory since World War II. (New York, NY: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • American Sociological Association. 1993.Report on the Discipline. (Washington, D.C.: ASA).

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1994.Report on the Discipline. (Washington, D.C.: ASA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldi, S. 1994. “Changes in the Stratification Structure of Sociology, 1964–1992,”The American Sociologist, 25(4): 28–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1997. “Departmental Quality Ratings and Visibility: The Advantages of Size and Age,”The American Sociologist 28(1): 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H.S. 1990. “The Most Critical Issue Facing the ASA,”The American Sociologist 21(4): 321–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, P. and W. Rau. 1992. “Sociology in the 1990s,”Society 30(1): 70–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. 1989. “Whose Keeper? Social Science and Moral Obligation,”New York Times Book Review 94(43): 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1992. “Sociology, A Disinvitation?”Society 30(1): 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. 1981.The Female World. (New York, NY: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R.J. 1988. “Metaphysical Critique and Utopia,”The Review of Metaphysics, 42(2): 255–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B. 1991. “An Account of a Professional Ethics Violation in Sociology,”The American Sociologist 22(3–4): 261–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best, J. 2001. “Giving It Away: The Ironies of Sociology's Place in Academia,”The American Sociologist 32(1): 107–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 2003. “Killing the Messenger: The Social Problems of Sociology,”Social Problems, 50(1): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. 2005. “2004 American Sociological Association Presidential Address for Public Sociology,”American Sociological Review 70(1): 4–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burris, V. 2004. “The Academic Caste System: Prestige Hierarchies in Ph.D. Exchange Networks,”American Sociological Review 69(2): 239–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. 2005. “The Promise of Public Sociology,”British Journal of Sociology 56(3): 355–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplow, T. and R. McGee. 1958.The Academic Marketplace. (New York, NY: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappell, C. 1995. “An Empirical Comment on the State of Sociology,”The American Sociologist 26(2): 78–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrter, A. 1970.An Assessment of Quality in Graduate Education. (Washington, DC: American Council on Education).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. 2001.What's Wrong With Sociology? (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. 1986. “Is 1980s Sociology in the Doldrums?”American Journal of Sociology 91(6): 1336–1355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1990. “The Organizational Politics of the ASA,”The American Sociologist 21(4): 311–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. 1975. “Two Methods in Search of a Substance,”American Sociological Review 40(6): 691–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, O.C. 1962.Capitalism and American Leadership. (New York, NY: Philosophical Library).

    Google Scholar 

  • Danzger, H.M. 1988. “Undergraduate Education in Sociology as Career Training: The Case for an Internship Program,”Teaching Sociology 16(1): 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L. 1977. “The Decline and Fall of Sociology, 1975–2000,”The American Sociologist 12(2): 56–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericson, R. 2005. “Publicizing Sociology,”British Journal of Sociology 56(3): 365–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabianic, D. 1991. “Declining Enrollments of Sociology Majors: Department Responses,”The American Sociologist 22(1): 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flower, J. 2004.Upstairs, Downstairs. (Akron, OH: University of Akron Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galliher, J. 1992. “The Three Eras of the American Sociologist,”The American Sociologist 23(2): 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, N. 1997. “A Critique of Twenty Family and Marriage and the Family Textbooks,”Family Relations 46(3): 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberger, M., B. Maher and P. Flattau. 1995.Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change. (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, J. 2000. “Causation, Statistics, and Sociology,”European Sociological Review 17(1): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. 1970.The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. (New York, NY: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, W. and N. Malcom. 1997. “Can Sociology Be A Science?: The Issue of Gender and Sex-Dimorphic Characteristics,”The American Sociologist, 28(4): 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, D. 1979. “American Sociology: Plight and Promise,”The American Sociologist 14(1): 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, A. 1979. “What Ought Sociology to be Doing? And Why Aren't We Doing It?,”The American Sociologist 14(2): 68–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, Terence and Morris Janowitz (Eds). 1992.Sociology and Its Publics: The Forms and Fates of Disciplinary Organization. (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand, C. and B. Judkins. 1999. “Disciplinary Schisms: Subspecialty ‘Drift’ and the Fragmentation of Sociology,”The American Sociologist 30(1): 18–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargens, I. 1990. “Sociologists' Assessment of the State of Sociology, 1969–1984,”The American Sociologist 21(3): 200–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartung, B. 1993. “The Plight of the Sociology Temporary.” Pp. 269–288 inA Critique of Contemporary American Sociology, edited by T. Vaughn, G. Sjoberg, and L. Reynolds. (Dix Hills, NY: General Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, A. 1981. “Whither the ASA?”The American Sociologist, 16(2): 108–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynor, A. and J. Varacalli, “Sociology's Fall from Grace” The Six Deadly Sins of a Discipline at the Crossroads,”Quarterly Journal of Ideology, 16(1–2): 3–29.

  • Herman, N. and L. T. Reynolds. 1994.Symbolic Interaction: An Introduction to Social Psychology. (Dix Hills, NY: General Hall, Inc).

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, E. 1989. “It's Time to Talk about Privilege: Developing an Inclusive Curriculum in Sociology,” paper read at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Association.

  • Horowitz, I.L. 1965. “The Life and Death of Project Camelot,”Trans-Action 3(1): 44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1968. “Social Science Yogis and Military Commissars,”Trans-Action, 5(6): 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1993.The Decomposition of Sociology. (New York, NY: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. 1925.A Study of Graduate Schools of America. (Oxford, OH: Miami University).

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1934.A Study of Graduate Schools of America. (Oxford, OH: Miami University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Imber, J.B. 2001. “Public Sociology: From Social Facts to Literary Act,”Social Forces 80(1): 353–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, B. 1998. “The Contemporary Crisis and the Social Relations Department at Harvard: A Case Study in Hegemony and Disintegration,”The American Sociologist 29(3): 26–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L., G. Lindsay, and P. Coggeshall. 1982.An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States—Social and Behavioral Sciences. (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz-Fishman, W. and J. Scott. 2005. “Comments on Burawoy: A View from the Bottom Up,”Critical Sociology 31(3): 371–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keith, B. 2000. “Taking Stock of the Discipline: Some Reflections on the State of American Sociology,”The American Sociologist 31(1): 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, M. 2001. “The Professional Ideology of Social Pathologists Transformed: The New Political Orthodoxy in Sociology,”The American Sociologist 32(4): 70–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keniston, H. 1959.Graduate Study and Research in the Arts and Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania. (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krier, D. and W.G. Staples. 1993. “Seen but Unseen: Part-Time Faculty and Institutional Surveillance and Control,”The American Sociologist 24(3–4): 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. 1976. “Sociology for Whom?”American Sociological Review 41(6): 925–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1981. “How Can the American Sociological Association Become More Useful?”American Sociologist, 16(2): 93–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liska, A. 1977. “The Dissipation of Sociological Social Psychology,”The American Sociologist, 12(1): 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynd, R.S. 1939.Knowledge for What? The Place of Social Science in American Culture. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R. 1977. “The College Market in Commercial Publishing: The Case of the Convertible?”The American Sociologist 12(3): 102–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M., R. Wright, and D. Daniels. 2001. “Is Deviance ‘Dead’? The Decline of a Sociological Research Specialization,”The American Sociologist 32(3): 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C.W. 1959.The Sociological Imagination. (New York, NY: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, L. 2001. “Editor's Introduction: Sociology and Its Specialty Fields,”The American Sociologist 32(3): 3–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orum, A. 1990. “Symposium: Ethical Issues in Scholarly Publication,”The American Sociologist 21(1): 67–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. 1959. “Some Problems Confronting Sociology as a Profession,”American Sociological Review 24(4): 547–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, O. 2002. “The Last Sociologist,”New York Times, May 19, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponting, R.J. 1995. “Sociology: A Discipline in Jeopardy?”Society 19(2): 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, L.T. 1998. “Two Deadly Diseases and One Nearly Fatal Cure,”The American Sociologist 29(1): 20–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P.H. 1990. “The Future of Sociology,”Contemporary Sociology 19(4): 623–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. 2005. “Who Will Speak, and Who Will Listen? comments on Burawoy and Public Sociology.”British Journal of Sociology 56(3): 405–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.L. and L.T. Reynolds. 1987. “The Sociologist as Critical Apologist: William Graham Summer as an Anti-Imperialist,”Humanity and Society 11(1): 58–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K.J., W.K. Fishman, K.C. Land, R.L. Simpson, and J.D. Wright. 1991. “Symptoms of Administrative Threats to Abolish Sociology: A Panel for Chairpersons,” panel presentation at the annual meetings of the Southern Sociological Society.

  • Sorokin, P. 1956.Fads and Foibles in Modern Sociology and Related Sciences. (Chicago, IL: H. Regnery Co).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorokin, P. and W. Lunden. 1959.Power and Morality; Who Shall Guard the Guardians? (Boston, MA: P. Sargent).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. and A. Vidich. 1963.Sociology on Trial. (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, H., J. Caldwell, and W. Vogler “Part Timers and the Academic Labor Market of the Eighties,”The American Sociologist 13(4): 184–195.

  • Turner, J. 1989. “The Disintegration of American Sociology: Pacific Sociological Association 1988 Presidential Address,”Sociological Perspectives 32(4): 419–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S. 1987. “Underdetermination and the Promise of Statistical Sociology,”Sociological Theory 5(2): 172–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1990. “Symposium: The Future of Sociological Theory,”The American Sociologist 21(3): 275–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S. and J. Turner. 1990.The Impossible Science: An Institutional Analysis of American Sociology. (Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turpin, J., M. Webber, A. Roschelle, W. Edwards, and J. Angilella. 1996. “Surviving and Thriving: Bringing Back Sociology at the University of San Francisco,”The American Sociologist 27(3): 8–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, T., G. Sjoberg, and L. Reynolds. 1993.Critique of Contemporary American Sociology. (Dix Hills, NY: General Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardell, M. and S. Turner (Eds.). 1986.Sociological Theory in Transition. (Boston, MA: Allen Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D., A. Short, and C. Schultz. 1983. “Applied Sociology and the Current Crisis,”Teaching Sociology 11(1): 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, D., C. Conrad, and E. Jensen. 1988. “Objective and Reputational Rankings of Ph.D.-Granting Departments of Sociology, 1965–1982,”Sociological Focus 21(2): 177–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, G. and D. Phillips. 1994. “Participation of Sociologists at Two-Year and Four-Year Colleges in the American Sociological Association,”The American Sociologist 25(3): 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W.F. 1998. “Rethinking Sociology: Applied and Basic Research,”The American Sociologist 29(1): 16–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, A. 1992. “Weak Sociology/Strong Sociologists: Consequences and Contradictions of a Field in Turmoil,”Social Research 59(4): 759–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, H. and R.K. Merton. 1971. “Patterns of Evaluation in Science: Institutionalization, Structure and Function of the Referee System,”Minerva 9(1): 66–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Stan C. Weeber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Stan C. Weeber is an associate professor of Sociology and Criminal Justice at McNeese State University. His interests in sociology include the sociology of sociology, social theory, political sociology, collective behavior and social movements, and crime/deviance. He can be reached at sweeber@mail.mcneese.edu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weeber, S.C. Elite versus mass sociology: An elaboration on Sociology's Academic Caste System. Am Soc 37, 50–67 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02915067

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02915067

Keywords

Search

Navigation