Abstract
We examined the relationship between trait measures of general appraisal and test anxiety, state measures of stress appraisals, affect, and intrusive cognition, and performance measures on two cognitive tests (mental math and Raven matrices). Participants were randomly assigned to threat, challenge, or control conditions that were created by manipulating both primary and secondary appraisals. We predicted that the threat condition would lead to more negative affect, stress appraisals, intrusive cognitions, and more errors. While our manipulated conditions led to inconsistent effects, path analyses tended to confirm predictions that negative task appraisals and trait test anxiety lead to negative affect and to intrusive cognitions, and that for mental math test performance a path from intrusive cognitions to test errors was established. The importance of understanding dispositionaland situational variables and their interactions during stress encounters are discussed, as is future research involving the general appraisal dimension.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Borgatta, E. F., & Corsini, R. J. (1964).Quick Word Test manual. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
Covington, M. V., & Omelich, C. L. (1987). Item difficulty and test performance among high anxious and low anxious students.Advances in Test Anxiety Research, 5, 127–135.
Florian, V., Mikulincer, M., & Taubman, O. (1995). Does hardiness contribute to mental health during a stressful real life situation? The roles of appraisal and coping.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 687–695.
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150–170.
Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & ter Schure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212–228.
Hemenover, S. H., & Dienstbier, R. A. (1996). Prediction of stress appraisals from mastery, extraversion, neuroticism, and general appraisal tendencies.Motivation and Emotion, 20, 299–317.
Holmes, T. H., & Rahe, R. H. (1967). The social readjustment rating scale.Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213–218.
Jerusalem, M. (1992). Personal resources, environmental constraints, and adaptation processes: The predictive power of a theoretical stress model.Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 15–24.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991).Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lazarus, R. S., & Alfert, E. (1964). Short-circuiting of threat by experimentally altering cognitive appraisal.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 195–205.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984).Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1986). Discrimination of threat cues without awareness in anxiety states.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 131–138.
Mathews, A., May, J., Mogg, K., & Eysenck, M. (1990). Attentional bias in anxiety: Selective search or defective filtering?Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 166–173.
Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality.Psychological Review, 80, 252–283.
Parkinson, L., & Rachman, S. (1981). Part 3—Intrusive thoughts: The effects of an uncontrived stress.Advances in Behavioral Research Therapy, 3, 111–118.
Peterson, C., Vaillant, G. E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1988). Pessimistic explanatory style is a risk factor for physical illness: A thirty-five-year longitudinal study.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 23–27.
Raven, J. C. (1958).Standard progressive matrices—Sets A, B, C, D and E. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Rotter, J. M. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80 (Whole No. 609).
Rotter, J. M. (1975). Some problems and misconceptions related to the construct of internal versus external control of reinforcement.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 56–67.
Sarason, I. G. (1961). The effects of anxiety and threat on the solution of a difficult task.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 165–168.
Sarason, I. G. (1984). Stress, anxiety, and cognitive interference: Reactions to tests.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 929–938.
Sarason, I. G., Sarason, B. R., Keefe, D. E., Hayes, B. E., & Shearin, E. N. (1986). Cognitive interference: Situational determinants and trait-like characteristics.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 215–226.
Sarason, I. G., & Stoops, R. (1978). Test anxiety and the passage of time.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 102–109.
Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813–838.
Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1987). Patterns of appraisal and emotion related to taking an exam.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 475–488.
Smith, C. A., Haynes, K. N., Lazarus, R. S., & Pope, L. K. (1993). In search of the hot cognitions: Attributions, appraisals, and their relation to emotion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 916–929.
Smith, C. A., & Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions.Cognition and Emotion, 7, 233–269.
Speisman, J. C., Lazarus, R. S., & Mordkoff, A. (1964). Experimental reductions of stress based on ego-defense theory.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 367–380.
Taylor, C. J., & Scogin, F. (1992). Dysphoria and coping in women: The effects of threat and challenge appraisals.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 11, 26–42.
Tomaka, J., Blascovich, J., Kelsey, R. M., & Leitten, C. L. (1993). Subjective, physiological and behavioral effects of threat and challenge appraisal.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 248–260.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors wish to thank the many students who acted as experimenters and helped with data entry. Thanks go to James Johnson, Ann Schuller, and Brandon Vancura for all their hard work. Special thanks go to Roger Lott for his expert performance as the main investigator in the threat and challenge conditions. An enormous debt of gratitude also goes to my wife Kathy for all her patience and support, and for her help with the audio tapes used in this study.
This study was completed as partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Master’s Degree for the first author.
Portions of this work will be presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, 1997.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hemenover, S.H., Dienstbier, R.A. The effects of an appraisal manipulation: Affect, intrusive cognitions, and performance for two cognitive tasks. Motiv Emot 20, 319–340 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02856521
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02856521