Skip to main content
Log in

Vibration characteristics of grafts for the tympanic membrane

  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Perforation of the tympanic membrane occurs frequently as a result of infection, external trauma, and high-level impulsive sound pressure, such as that associated with an explosion. Many different surgical techniques can be used to repair the tympanic membrane and ossicles. Clinical operations such as tympanoplasty are undertaken to repair the damaged tympanic membrane and ossicles, thus improving hearing and reducing the chance of infection. The membrane is repaired or replaced with the use of graft materials, either from the patient’s body or from artificial sources. The selection of graft material is very important because, as much as possible, it must exhibit the same dynamic behavior as the natural membrane. To compare various allograft materials, investigators developed a model of the ear on which different graft materials can be replaced. Three different membrane materials—irradiated allograft dura (Tutoplast® Dura; IOP Inc., Costa Mesa, Calif), irradiated allograft fascia lata (Tutoplast Fascia Lata; IOP Inc.), and irradiated allograft fascia temporalis (Tutoplast Fascia Temporalis; IOP Inc.)—were used. Vibration responses of these membrane materials produced by defined sound signals with different frequencies were recorded by a small strain gauge; the spectra of sound for various corresponding input signals were recorded, and the results were compared with those of the sample graft material. Tutoplast Fascia Lata accomplished the best dynamic performance in vitro. Additional clinical and experimental data are needed, however, to determine which of these materials provides the best audiological and clinical performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Voss SE, Rosowski JJ, Merchant SN, Peake WT. Middle-ear function with tympanic-membrane perforations. I. Measurements and mechanisms.J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;110:1432–1444.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Glasscock ME, Kanok MM. Tympanoplasty: a chronological history.Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1977;10:469–477.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Storss LA. Myringoplasty with use of fascial grafts.Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1961;74:45.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ringenberg JC. Closure of tympanic membrane perforations by the use of fat.Laryngoscope. 1978; 88:982–993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Eviatar A. Tragal perichondrium and cartilage in reconstructive ear surgery.Laryngoscope. 1978; 88(suppl 11):1–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shea JJ Jr. Vein graft closure of eardrum perforations.J Laryngol Otol. 1960;74:358–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Koury E, Faris C, Sharma S, Quinn SJ. How we do it: free conchal cartilage revisited for primary reconstruction of attic defects in combined approach tympanoplasty.Clin Otolaryngol. 2005;30: 465–467.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vos JD, Latev MD, Labadie RF, Cohen SM, Werkhaven JA, Haynes DS. Use of AlloDerm in type I tympanoplasty: a comparison with native tissue grafts.Laryngoscope. 2005;115:1599–1602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sarac S, Gursel B. Use of homograft dehydrated temporal fascia in tympanoplasty.Otol Neurotol. 2002;23:416–421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Behbehani AA, Eichner E. Experiences with solvent-dried fascia lata in surgical interventions in otorhinolaryngology [in German].Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1983;62:548–551.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yetiser S, Tosun F, Satar B. Revision myringoplasty with solvent-dehydrated human dura mater (Tutoplast).Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;124:518–521.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kridel RW. Septal perforation repair.Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1999;32:695–724.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Guerra MF, Perez JS, Rodriguez-Campo FJ, Gias LN. Reconstruction of orbital fractures with dehydrated human dura mater.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;58:1361–1366.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sclafani AP, McCormick SA, Cocker R. Biophysical and microscopic analysis of homologous dermal and fascial materials for facial aesthetic and reconstructive uses.Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2002;4:164–171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hathaway JK, Choe JM. Intact genetic material is present in commercially processed cadaver allografts used for pubovaginal slings.J Urol. 2002;168:1040–1043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Goode RL, Killion M, Nakamura K, Nishihara S. New knowledge about the function of the human middle ear: development of an improved analog model.Am J Otol. 1994;15:145–154.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Goode RL, Ball G, Nishihara S, Nakamura K. Laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV)—a new clinical tool for the otologist.Am J Otol. 1996;17:813–822.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ball GR, Huber A, Goode RL. Scanning laser Doppler vibrometer of the middle ear ossicles.Ear Nose Throat J. 1997;76:213–218, 220, 222.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Beer HJ, Bornitz M, Hardtke HJ, et al. Modelling of components of the human middle ear and simulation of their dynamic behaviour.Audiol Neurootol. 1999;4:156–162.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zahnert T, Bornitz M, Huttenbrink KB. Acoustic and mechanical properties of tympanic mem- brane transplants [in German].Laryngorhinootologie. 1997;76:717–723.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Yener MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oktem, F., Toprak, M., Yener, M. et al. Vibration characteristics of grafts for the tympanic membrane. Adv Therapy 24, 81–90 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02849995

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02849995

Keywords

Navigation