Skip to main content
Log in

Cytoplasmic regionalization in starfish oocyte occurrence and localization of cytoplasmic determinants responsible for the formation of archenteron and primary mesenchyme in starfish (asterias amurensis) oocytes

  • Published:
Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Starfish oocytes with intact germinal vesicles (GVs) were cut along desired planes with glass needles or ligated using silk thread loops into two parts and allowed to mature in vitro, and inseminated. The experimental results showed that (1) only the parts with GVs or partial GV contents (PGVCs) cleaved, those without any GV materials did not; but nucleated and non-nucleated fragments cut from mature eggs were able to divide; (2) the development of animal parts of oocytes containing GVs or PGVCs was like that of animal fragments of matured oocytes with female pronuclei; most of them gave rise to permanent blastulae, and just a few formed ectodermal vesicles with a little primary mesenchyme; (3) a large part of vegetal fragments with GVs or PGVCs, and the vegetal parts of mature eggs without female pronuclei developed into small but normal embryos; (4) the fragments containing GVs or PGVCs obtained from the oocytes along a plane parallel to the animal-vegetal (A-V) axis developed as normally as the halves (with or without female pronuclei) severed from mature eggs along the same axis. Based on the data above, it was concluded that (1) the non-chromatin materials in the oocyte GVs are indispensable for successful fertilization and cleavage of starfish eggs; (2) some factor (s) located asymmetrically in the vegetal hemispheres of starfish oocytes is (are) responsible for formation of the archenteron and primary mesenchyme. It is evident from the above findings that the oocyte cytoplasm of the starfish had already regionalized before the GV break-down.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bates, W. R. and W. R. Jeffery, 1987. Localization of axial determinants in the vegetal pole region of ascidian eggs.Dev. Biol. 124: 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boveri, T., 1901. Die Poloritat von Ovozyte, Ei und Larve des Strongylocentrotus lividus.Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Anat. Ontog. Tiere 14: 630–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capco, D. G. and M. D. Mecca, 1988. Analysis of proteins in the peripheral and central regions of amphibian oocytes and eggs.Cell Differ.23: 155–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chabry, L. 1887 Contribution a l'embryologie normale et teratologique des Ascidies simples.J. Anat. Physiol. 23: 167–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, E. G., 1905. The organization and cell lineage of the asicidian egg.J. Acad. Natl. Sci. Philadelphia 13: 1–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, D. P., 1940. The fertilizability of nucleated and non-nucleated fragments of centrifuged Nereis eggs.J. Morph. 66: 99–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, R. J. and J. R. Whittaker, 1986. Developmental autonomy of presumptive notochord cells in partial embryos of an ascidian.Int. J. Invertebr. Reprod. Dev. 9: 253–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, E. H., 1976. Gene Activity in Early Development. Academic Press, New York. pp.245–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, E. H., 1986. Gene Activity in Early Development (third edition). Academic Press. Inc. pp. 409–524.

  • Delage, Y., 1901. Etudes experimentales sur la maturation cytoplasimque et sur la parthenogenese articielle chez les echinodermes.Arch. Zool. Exp. 3ser 9: 285–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, L. M., 1975. Germ plasm and the differentiation for the germ line.Int. Rev. Cytol. 43: 229–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnly, M. H., 1926. Localization of the micromere materials in the cytoplasm of the egg of Arbacia.J. Exp. Zool. 45: 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirai, S., Kubota, J. and Kanatani, H., 1971. Induction of cytoplasmic maturation by 1-methyladenine in starfish oocytes after removal of the germinal vesicle.Exp. Cell Res. 68: 137–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirai, S., Nagahama. Y., Kishimoto, T. and Kanatani, H., 1981. Cytoplasmic maturity revealed by the structural changes in incorported spermatizoon during the course of starfish oocyte maturation. Develop. Growth and Differ.23: 465–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horstadius. S., 1928. Uber die Determination des Keines bei Echinideremen.Acta. Zool. 9: 1–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horstadius. S., 1937. Investigations as to the localization of the micromere, the skeleton and the entodermforming material in the unfertilized egg of Arbacia punctulata.Biol. Bull. 73: 295–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horstadius. S., 1939. The mechanics of sea urchin development, studied by operative methods.Biol. Rev. 14: 132–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwamatsu. T., 1966. Role of germinal vesicle materials on the acquisition of developmental capacity of the fish oocyte.Embryologia 9: 205–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, W. R. and W. R. Bates. 1987. Ooplasmic segregation in the ascidianStyela.In “Molecular Biology of Fertilization” (H. Schatten and G. Schatten. Eds.) Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, W. R., 1984. Pattern formation by ooplasmic segregation in ascidian eggs.Biol. Bull. 16: 277–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanatani, H., 1973. Maturation-inducing substance in starfishes.Int. Rev. Cytol. 35: 253–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katagiri, C. and M. Moriya, 1976. Spermatozoan response to the toad egg matured after removal of germinal vesicle.Dev. Biol. 50: 235–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klag, J. J. and G. A. Ubbels, 1975. Regional morphological differentiation in the fertilized egg ofDiscoglossus pictus (anura).Differentiation 3: 15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahowald, A. P., C. D. Allis, K. M. Karrer, E. M. Underwood and G. L. Waring, 1979. Germ plasm and pole cells ofDrosophila.In “Determinants of Spatial Organization” (S. Subtelny and I. R. Konigsbery, Eds.). Academic Press. New York, pp. 127–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maruyama, Y. K., Y. Kakaseko and S. Yagi, 1985. Localization of cytoplasmic determinants responsible for primary mesenchyme formation and gastrulation in the unfertilized egg of the sea urchin Hemicentrotus pulcherrimus.J. Exp. Zool. 236: 155–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, P., 1984. Are the primordial germ cells (PGC) in Urodeles formed by the inductive action of the vegetative yolk mass?Dev. Biol. 103: 109–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, T. H., 1934. Embryology and Genetics (Columbia University Press, New York). 100 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niki, Y., 1984. Developmental analysis of the grandchildless (gs(1) N26) mutation inDrosophila melanogaster. Abnormal cleavage patterns and defects in pole cell formation.Dev. Biol. 103: 182–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishikata, T., I. Mita Miyazawa, T. Deno and N. Satoh, 1987. Muscle cell differentiation in ascidian embryos analyzed with a tissue-specific monoclonal antibody.Development 99: 163–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tung, T. C., Ku, S. H. and Y. F. Y. Tung, 1941. The development of the ascidian egg centrifuged before fertilization.Biol. 2: 153–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tung, T. C., S. C. Wu and Y. F. Yen, 1981. Regionalization of the egg cytoplasm of the lower chordates before fertilization.American Zoologist 24: 419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzman, J. A. and W. R. Jeffery, 1986. Cytoplasmic determinants for cell lineage specification in ascidian embryos.Cell Differ.18: 215–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. J., 1973. Segregation during ascidian embryogenesis of egg cytoplasmic information for tissue specific enzyme development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.70: 2096–2100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, J. R., 1976. Cytoplasmic determinants of tissue differentiation in the ascidian egg.In “Determinants of Spatial Organization” (S. Subtelny and Konigsberg, eds.) Academic Press, New York, pp. 29–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. B., 1903. Experiments on cleavage and localization in the nemertine egg. Roux' Arch. Entwicklungsmech.16: 411–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. B., 1925. The Cell in Development and Heredity, (MacMillan, London). pp. 1035–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu S. C., 1986. Localization of adult tropomyosin in the developing oocytes of amphioxus. Branchiostoma belcheri. Int. Minisymp. On Develop. Biol. Proc., Beijing, 114–115.

  • Wylie, C. C., D. Brown, S. F. Godsave, J. Quarby, and J. Heasman, 1985. The cytoskeleton ofXenopus oocytes and its role in development.J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 89 supplement, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, H. and S. Hirai, 1984. Role of contents of the germinal vesicle in male pronuclear development and cleavage of starfish oocytes.Develop. Growth and Differ.26: 479–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yatsu, N., 1904. Aster formation in enucleated egg-fragments of Cerebratus.Science. N. S. 11: 889–890.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution No. 1722 from the Institute of Oceanology, Academia Sinica

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shicui, Z., Xianhan, W., Jing, Z. et al. Cytoplasmic regionalization in starfish oocyte occurrence and localization of cytoplasmic determinants responsible for the formation of archenteron and primary mesenchyme in starfish (asterias amurensis) oocytes. Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 8, 263–272 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02849666

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02849666

Keywords

Navigation