Skip to main content
Log in

Surface charge and hydrophobicity of wild and mutantCrithidia fasciculata

  • Published:
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surface charge of wild-typeCrithidia fasciculata and three drug-resistant mutants (TR3, TFRR1, and FUR11) was studied by direct zeta-potential determination and ultrastructural cytochemistry. Surface tension was also investigated by measurements of the advancing contact angle formed by the protozoa monolayers with drops of liquids of different polarities. The individual zeta potential varies markedly among theC. fasciculata cells. The wild and FUR11 mutant strains displayed lower negative surface charge (−12.5 and −9.5 mV, respectively), as compared with the TR3 (−14.8 mV) and TFRR1 (−14.7 mV) mutant strains. Binding of cationized ferritin (CF) was observed at the cell surface of wild and mutant strains ofC. fasciculata. Neuraminidase treatment reduced the negative surface charge in the TFRR1 and TR3 mutants in about 37 and 29%, respectively, whereas no significant change was observed with the wild and FUR11 mutant strains. These findings suggest that sialic acid residues are the major anionogenic groups on the surface ofC. fasciculata. The density of sialic acid residues per cell in wild and mutant strains ofC. fasciculata falls in a range of 1.4×104 to 3.6×104. Marked differences of hydrophobicity were also observed. For example, the TFRR1, FUR11, and TR3 drug-resistant mutant strains showed higher contact angle values (55.4, 54.2, and 49.3, respectively) than the wild-type (35.6), as assessed by α-bromonaphtalene.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. James, A. M. (1979)Chem. Soc. Rev. 8, 389.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schauer, R. (1982)Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 40, 131.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Oss, C. J., Good, R. J., and Chaudhury, M. K. (1986)J. Coll. Interf. Sci. 111, 378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Criado, M. T., Ferreiros, C. M., and Sainz, V. (1986)Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 175, 27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hesketh, L. M., Wyatt, J. E., and Handley, P. S. (1987)Microbios. 50, 131.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Magnusson, K. E. (1982)J. Infect. Dis. 33 Suppl., 34.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Van Oss, C. J. (1978)Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 32, 19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Amory, D. E. and Rouxhet, P. G. (1988)Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 938, 61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Amory, D. E. and Rouxhet, P. G. (1988)J. Inst. Brew. 94, 79.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kitamura, A. (1982)J. Cell Sci. 58, 185.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Silva Filho, F. C. and Van Oss, C. J. (1992)Microbiology in press.

  12. Wallace, F. G. (1966)Exp. Parasitol. 18, 124.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hughes, D. E., Schneider, C. A., and Simpson, L. (1982)J. Parasitol. 68, 642.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hughes, D. E., Simpson, L., and Schneider, C. A. (1983)J. Protozool. 30, 635.

    Google Scholar 

  15. De Souza, W., Bunn, M. N., and Angluster, J. (1976)J. Protozool. 23, 329.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Roitman, C., Roitman, I., and Azevedo, H. P. (1972)J. Protozool. 19, 346.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gasic, G. J., Berwicz, L., and Sorrentino, M. (1968)Lab. Invest. 18, 63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Danon, D., Goldstein, L., Marikovsky, J., and Skutelsky, E. (1972)J. Ultrastruct. Res. 38, 500.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Turco, S. J. (1988)Parasitol. Today 4, 255.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Oss, C. J., Chaudhury, M. K., and Good, R. J. (1987)Adv. Coll. Interf. Sci. 28, 35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Oss, C. J., Chaudhury, M. K., and Good, R. J. (1989)J. Coll. Interf. Sci. 128, 313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schauer, R. (1978) inMeth Enzymol. 50, 64.

  23. Schauer, R. (1987) inMeth Enzymol. 138, 132.

  24. Varki, A. and Diaz, S. (1984)Anal. Biochem. 137, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Warren, L. (1959)J. Biol. Chem. 23, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Baier, R. E. and Meyer, A. E. (1983)Physicochemical Aspects of Polymer Surfaces, vol. 2 (Nittal, K. L., ed.), Plenum, New York, p. 895.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Overbeek, J. T. G. (1985) inModern Trends of Colloid Science in Chemistry and Biology, (H. F. Eicke, ed.), Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, 37.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Silva Filho, F. C., Elias, C. A., and De Souza, W. (1987)Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 82, 379.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Soares, R. M. A., Alviano, C. S., Esteves, M. J. G., Angluster, J., Silva Filho, F. C., and De Souza, W. (1988)Cell Biophys. 13, 29.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fiorini, J. E., Roitman, I., Angluster, J., Alviano, C. S., Silva Filho, F. C., and De Souza, W. (1991)Parasitol Res. 77, 102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. De Souza, W., Arguello, C., Martinez-Palomo, A., Trissl, D., Gonzales-Robles, A., and Chiari, E. (1977)J. Protozool. 24, 441.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Silva Filho, F. C., Saraiva, E. M. B., Santos, M. A. V., and De Souza, W. (1990)Cell Biophys. 17, 137.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Esteves, M. J. G., Andrade, A. F. G., Alviano, C. S., Roitman, I., De Souza, W., and Angluster, J. (1987)J. Protozool. 36, 226.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lopes, A. H. C. S., Silva Filho, F. C., Alviano, C. S., Jurkiewicz, A., Angluster, J., and De Souza, W. (1989)J. Protozool. 36, 231.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Oda, L. M., Alviano, C. S., Silva Filho, F. C., Angluster, J., Roitman, I., and De Souza, W. (1984)J. Protozool. 31, 131.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Burry, R. W. and Wood, J. G. (1979)J. Cell Biol. 82, 726.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Eylar, E. H., Maddoff, M. A., Brody, O. V., and Oncley, J. L. (1962)J. Biol. Chem. 237, 1992.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Furchgott, R. F. and Ponder, E. (1941)J. Gen. Physiol. 24, 447.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Tenforde, T. (1970) inAdvances in Biological and Medical Physics, (Lawrence, J. H. and Gofmman, J. W., eds.), Academic, New York, 43.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Seaman, G. V. P. and Uhlenbruck, G. (1963)Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 100, 493.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Cook, G. M. W., Heard, D. H., and Seaman, G. V. F. (1961)Nature 191, 44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Seaman, G. V. P. and Heard, D. H. (1960)J. Gen. Physiol. 41, 251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Alviano, C. S., Pereira, M. E. A., De Souza, W., Oda, L. M., and Travassos, L. R. (1982)FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 15, 223.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Oliveira, M. M., Antunes, A., Silva, R., and De Mello, F. G. (1984)Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 11, 283.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Angluster, J., Bunn, M. M., and De Souza, W. (1977)J. Parasitol. 63, 922.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Sukupolvi, S. and Vaara, M. (1989)Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 988, 377.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

do Valle Matta, M.A., Alviano, C.S., Angluster, J. et al. Surface charge and hydrophobicity of wild and mutantCrithidia fasciculata . Cell Biochem Biophys 20, 69–79 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02782655

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02782655

Keywords

Navigation