Skip to main content
Log in

Stimulus significance effects in habituation of the phasic and tonic orienting reflex

  • Papers
  • Published:
Integrative Physiological & Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phasic and tonic measures of electrodermal activity were examined in a simple habituation paradigm, using innocuous visual stimuli. Separate groups were used to investigate the effects of stimulus significance, as manipulated by instructions. One group had no stimulus-related task (indifferent group), while the other was asked to silently count the stimuli to report to the experimenter later (significant group). Prestimulus skin conductance levels were considered as measures of the arousal level at each stimulus presentation, and the subsequent electrodermal responses were taken as the phasic orienting reflex (OR) elicited by each stimulus. Changes in prestimulus arousal were taken as measures of the tonic OR to the experimental series. Marked group differences were found in both phasic and tonic components of the OR. Some, but not all, of the significance effects in the phasic OR were attributable to differences in arousal. The results are discussed in the context of theoretical accounts of the OR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barry, R.J. (1984a). Preliminary processes in OR elicitation.Acta Psychologica, 55, 109–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, R.J. (1984b). Stimulus omission and the orienting response.Psychophysiology, 21, 535–540.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, R.J. (1987a). Orienting and other responses to preliminary process theory. In P.K. Ackles, J.R. Jennings & M.G.H. Coles (Eds.)Advances in Psychophysiology, Vol. 2. JAI Press, Greenwich CT, pp. 285–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, R.J. (1987b). Preliminary processes in orienting response elicitation. In P.K. Ackles, J.R. Jennings & M.G.H. Coles (Eds.)Advances in Psychophysiology, Vol. 2. JAI Press, Greenwich CT, pp. 131–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, R.J. (1990a). Scoring criteria for response latency and habituation in electrodermal research: A study in the context of the orienting response.Psychophysiology, 27, 94–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, R.J. (1990b). The orienting response: Stimulus factors and response measures.Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 25, 93–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, R.J. (1996). Preliminary process theory: towards an integrated account of the psychophysiology of cognitive processes.Acta Neurobioliae Experimentalis, 56, 469–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, R.J., Clarke, A.R., McCarthy, R., Selikowitz, M., Rushby, J.A. & Ploskova, E. (2004). EEG differences in children as a function of resting-state arousal level.Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 402–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, R.J. & James, A.L.. (1981). Fractionation of respiratory and vascular responses with simple visual stimulation.Physiological Psychology, 9, 96–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, R.J. & O’Gorman, J.G.. (1987). Stimulus omission and the orienting response: Latency differences suggest different mechanisms.Biological Psychology, 25, 261–276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, R.J. & O’Gorman, J.G. (1989). Methods and mechanisms in electrodermal studies of omission responding.Biological Psychology, 28, 271–277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, R.J. & Sokolov, E.N. (1993). Habituation of phasic and tonic components of the orienting reflex.International Journal of Psychophysiology, 15, 39–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Shakhar, G. (1980). Habituation of the orienting response to complex sequences of stimuli.Psychophysiology, 6, 524–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, P.M. & Thompson, R.F. (1970). Habituation: A dual-process theory.Psychological Review, 77, 419–450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iacono, W.G. & Lykken, D.T. (1983). The effects of instructions on electrodermal habituation.Psychophysiology, 20, 71–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, P. (1992). Towards a reconceptualization of the law of initial value.Psychological Bulletin, 111, 176–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maltzman, I. (1979a). Orienting reflexes and classical conditioning in humans. In H.D. Kimmel, E.H. van Olst & J.F. Orlebeke (Eds.),The orienting reflex in humans. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 381–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltzman, I. (1979b). Orienting reflexes and significance: A reply to O’Gorman.Psychophysiology, 16, 274–282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maltzman, I. (1990). The OR and significance.Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 25, 111–122.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siddle, D.A.T. (1991). Orienting, habituation and resource allocation: An associative analysis.Psychophysiology, 28, 245–259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov, E.N. (1955). The higher nervous activity and the problem of perception.Acta Psychologica 13, 134–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov, E.N. (1960). Neuronal models and the orienting reflex. In MA Brazier (Ed.),The central nervous system and behavior: transactions of the 3rd conference. Macy, New York, pp. 187–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov, E.N. (1963a). Higher nervous functions: the OR.Annual Review of Physiology, 25, 545–580.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov, E.N. (1963b).Perception and the conditioned reflex, Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R.F., Berry, S.D., Rinaldi, P.C., & Berger, T.W. (1979). Habituation and the orienting reflex: The dual process theory revisited. In H.D. Kimmel E.H. van Olst & J.F. Orlebeke (Eds.),The orienting reflex in humans, Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ, pp. 21–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder, J. (1967).Stimulus and response: The law of initial value. Bristol: Wright.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert J. Barry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barry, R.J. Stimulus significance effects in habituation of the phasic and tonic orienting reflex. Integrative Physiological & Behavioral Science 39, 166–179 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02734437

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02734437

Key Words

Navigation