Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Measurement of signal and noise characteristics in ongoing auditory brainstem response averaging

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although diagnostic testing with auditory evoked potentials (EPs) has become routine, quantitative measurements of signal and noise are still lacking. In this study, current signal, power, noise power, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) estimation formulas are reviewed and applied to auditory brainstem response averaging. Single-sweep responses to individual sound stimuli are recorded and estimation formulas are evaluated during off-line averaging under various sound level and noise conditions. The results show that the quality of the averaged EP can be quantitatively assessed by the continuous display of the SNR and residual noise estimates during the averaging process. This method also allows the study of different types of averaging techniques to improve EP response acquisition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aunon, J. I., C. D. McGillem, and D. G. Childers. Signal processing in evoked potential research: Averaging and modeling.CRC Crit. Rev. Bioeng. 5:323–367, 1981.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bershad, N. J., and A. J. Rockmore. On estimating signal-to-noise ratio using the sample-correlation coefficient.IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory IT-20:112–113, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Callaway, E., and R. A. Halliday. Evoked potential variatbility: Effects of age, amplitude and methods of measurement.Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 34: 125–133, 1973.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Coppola, R., R. Tabor, and M. S. Bushbaum. Signal to noise ratio and response variability measurements in single trial evoked potentials.Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 44:214–222, 1978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Davila, C., and M. S. Mobin. Weighted averaging of evoked potentials.IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. BME-39: 338–345, 1992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Delgado, R. E., Ö. Özdamar, and R. E. Eilers. Rapid automated ABR threshold determination for newborn hearing screening.Audiol. Today 5:43, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Delgado, R. E., Ö. Özdamar, and E. Miskiel. On-line system for automated auditory evoked response threshold determination. In:IEEE EMBS Tenth Annual Conference Proceedings, IEEE Press, New York, NY, 1988, pp. 1472–1473.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Don, M., C. Elberling, and M. Waring. Objective detection of averaged auditory brainstem responses.Scand. Audiol. 13:219–228, 1984.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Don, M., and C. Elberling. Evaluating residual background noise in human auditory brain-stem responses.J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96:2746–2757, 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Elberling, C., and M. Don. Quality estimation of averaged auditory brainstem responses.Scand. Audiol. 13:187–197, 1984.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Elberling, C., and O. Wahlgreen. Estimation of auditory brainstem response, ABR, by means of Bayesian inference.Scand. Audiol. 14:89–96, 1985.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Elberling, C., and M. Don. Threshold characteristics of the human auditory brain stem response.J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 81:115–121, 1987.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoke, M., B. Ross, B. Wickesberg, and B. Lütkenhöner. Weighted averaging—theory and application to electric response auditometry.Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 57:487–489, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Martin, W. H., J. W. Schwegler, A. L. Gleeson, and Y-B. Shi. New techniques of hearing assessment.Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am. 27:487–510, 1994.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Möcks, J., T. Gasser, and P. D. Tuan. Variability of single visual evoked potentials evaluated by two new statistical tests.Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 57:571–580, 1984.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Özdamar, Ö., R. Delgado, R. E. Eilers, and J. E. Widen. Computer methods for automated hearing determination with auditory brainstem responses.Ear Hear. 11:417–429, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Özdamar, Ö., R. Kaplan, E. Miskiel, and R. Delgado. Human-machine interface for an interactive evoked potential electro-diagnostic system. In:Trends in Ergonomic/Human Factors IV, edited by S. Asfour. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1987, pp. 1121–1129.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Raz, J., B. Turetsky, and G. Fein. Confidence intervals for the signal-to-noise ratio when a signal embedded in noise is observed over repeated trials.IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. BME-35:646–649, 1988.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sininger, Y. S. Auditory brain stem response for objective measures of hearing.Ear Hear. 14:23–30, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Turetsky, B. I., J. Raz, and G. Fein. Noise and signal power, and their effects on evoked potential estimation.Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 71:310–318, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Intelligent Hearing Systems Corporation, Miami, FL

    Rafael E. Delgado

  2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, P.O. Box. 248294, 33124, Coral Gables, FL, U.S.A.

    Özcan Özdamar

Authors
  1. Özcan Özdamar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rafael E. Delgado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Özdamar, Ö., Delgado, R.E. Measurement of signal and noise characteristics in ongoing auditory brainstem response averaging. Ann Biomed Eng 24, 702–715 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02684183

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02684183

Keywords

Search

Navigation