Skip to main content
Log in

Transient promoter activity in primary rat mammary epithelial cells evaluated using particle bombardment gene transfer

  • Genetics
  • Published:
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The relative strengths of several commonly used viral promoters in primary cultures of rat mammary epithelial cells were studied using a particle bombardment gene transfer method. NIH 3T3 cells were also examined as a representative cell line. Initially, the conditions necessary for efficient gene transfer using particle bombardment were determined. Discharge voltage for particle bombardment was evaluated to maximize the levels of gene expression and cell viability. After transfection, transgene expression decreased over a 5-day period in both mammary cells and NIH 3T3 cells. Particle bombardment gene transfer was at least fivefold more efficient than lipofection, calcium phosphate co-precipitation, or electroporation. The activity of five viral enhancer/promoters was compared using a luciferase gene assay system. The relative promoter strengths in mammary cells were determined to be: RSV ≈ CMV ≈ SV40 > MLV > MMTV. Tissue-specific activity of the MMTV-LTR was demonstrated, although this promoter conferred the lowest expression level among the promoters tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brash, D. E.; Reddel, R. R.; Quanrud, M., et al. Strontium phosphate transfection of human cells in primary culture: stable expression of the simian virus 40 large-T-antigen gene in primary human bronchial epithelial cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7:2031–2034; 1987.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. deWet, J. R.; Wood, K. V.; DeLuca, M., et al. Firefly luciferase gene: structure and expression in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7:725–737; 1987.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Foecking, M. K.; Hofstetter, H. Powerful and versatile enhancer-promoter unit for mammalian expression vectors. Gene 45:101–105; 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ginot, F.; Decaux, J.-F.; Cognet, M., et al. Transfection of hepatic genes into adult rat hepatocytes in primary culture and their tissue-specific expression. Eur. J. Biochem. 180:289–294; 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gorman, C. M.; Merlino, G. T.; Willingham, M. C., et al. The rous sarcoma virus long terminal repeat is a strong promoter when introduced into a variety of eukaryotic cells by DNA-mediated transfection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79:6777–6781; 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gorman, C. M.; Moffat, L. F.; Howard, B. H. Recombinant genomes which express chloramphenicol acetyltransferase in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2:1044–1051; 1982.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gould, M. N.; Zhang, R. Genetic regulation of carcinogenesis in the rat by susceptibility and suppressor genes. Environ. Health Perspect. 93:161–167; 1991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kirkland, W. L.; Yang, N.-S.; Jorgensen, T., et al. Growth of normal and malignant mammary epithelial cells in culture. JNCI 63:29–41; 1979.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kriegler, M. Gene transfer and expression: a laboratory manual. New York: Stockton Press; 1990:96–101.

    Google Scholar 

  10. MacGregor, G. R.; Mogg, A. E.; Burke, J. F., et al. Histochemical staining of clonal mammalian cell lines expressingE. coli β-galactosidase indicates heterogenous expression of the bacterial gene. Somatic Cell Mol. Genet. 13:253–265; 1987.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. MacGregor, G. R.; Caskey, C. T. Construction of plasmids that expressE. coli β-galactosidase in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 17:2365; 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ponder, K. P.; Dunbar, R. P.; Wilson, D. R., et al. Evaluation of relative promoter strength in primary hepatocytes using optimized lipofection. Hum. Gene Ther. 2:41–52; 1991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ross, S. R.; Hsu, C.-L. L.; Choi, Y., et al. Negative regulation in correct tissue-specific expression of mouse mammary tumor virus in transgenic mice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:5822–5829; 1990.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sambrook, J.; Fritsch, E. F.; Maniatis, T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989:1.21–1.84.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, B.; Kennan, W. S.; Yasukawa-Barnes, J., et al. Carcinoma induction following directin situ transfer of v-Ha-ras into rat mammary epithelial cells using replication-defective retrovirus vectors. Cancer Res. 51:2642–2648; 1991.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Xian-jun, F.; Keating, A.; deVilliers, J., et al. Tissue-specific activity of heterologous viral promoters in primary rat hepatocytes and hep G2 cells. Hepatology 10:781–787; 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang, N.-S.; Burkholder, J.; Roberts, B., et al.In Vivo andin vitro gene transfer to mammalian somatic cells by particle bombardment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:9568–9572; 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, T.A., Gould, M.N., Burkholder, J.K. et al. Transient promoter activity in primary rat mammary epithelial cells evaluated using particle bombardment gene transfer. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol - Animal 29, 165–170 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02630949

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02630949

Key words

Navigation