Skip to main content
Log in

Enhancing learning during a clinical clerkship

The value of a structured curriculum

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Third-year clerkships, organized around clinical experiences, may provide students with an uneven or narrowly focused fund of clinical knowledge. This paper describes the results of a comparative trial in which a structured curriculum, based on learning objectives, was introduced into an internal medicine clerkship at one of three teaching hospitals of a single medical school; the other two hospitals, providing similar patient care experiences, were used for comparison purposes. Students who did their clerkship at the hospital using the structured curriculum scored significantly higher on the Medicine section of the National Board Part II examination when scores were adjusted for past academic performance. The structured curriculum was very well received and, according to student perceptions, achieved the goal of expanding their basic clinical knowledge beyond that derived from reading only in connection with patient care. These results support the use of curricular guidelines and objectives as a means of enhancing students’ cognitive experience during clinical clerkships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Foley RP, Smilansky J. Teaching techniques: a handbook for health professionals. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wigton RS. Effect of lectures and increased experience in gastroen-terology on examination scores of internal medicine residents. Gastroenterology 1981;80:601–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gjerde CL. The domains and cognitive processes in medical school objectives. J Med Educ 1978;53:352–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mager RF. Preparing instructional objectives. Belmont, California: Fearson Pitman, Inc., 1975:1–122

    Google Scholar 

  5. Christensen CR. Teaching by the case method. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wilkins RW, Levinsky NG. Medicine: essentials of clinical practice. 3rd edition. Boston, Massachusetts: Little Brown and Co., 1983

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barrows HS, Tamblyn RM. Problem-based learning: an approach to medical education. New York: Springer Publishing Co. Inc., 1980

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hyman RT. Improving discussion leadership. New York: Teachers College Press, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kasulis TP, Questioning. In: Gullette MM (ed.). The art and craft of teaching. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard-Danforth Center for Teaching and Learning, 1980;38–48

    Google Scholar 

  10. SAS Institute Inc: SAS user guide: Statistics, 1982 Ed. Carey, North Carolina: SAS Institute Inc., 1982;177

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elstein AS, Schulman LS, Sprafka SA. Medical problem solving: an analysis of clinical reasoning. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1978;292

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tosteson DC. Learning medicine. N Engl J Med, 301:690–4, 1979

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received from Evans Memorial Department of Clinical Research and Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, University Hospital, and Boston University School of Public Health, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ende, J., Pozen, J.T. & Levinsky, N.G. Enhancing learning during a clinical clerkship. J Gen Intern Med 1, 232–237 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596189

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596189

Key words

Navigation