Abstract
Digital intravenous subtraction angiography (DISA) was used to evaluate 28 patients who had undergone renal artery reconstruction either as part of a renal transplant procedure or for treatment of renovascular hypertension. Satisfactory visualization of the renal artery was obtained in 26 cases, and the clinical questions were adequately answered in these cases. The findings included a variety of possible outcomes and demonstrate the adequacy of DISA as a means of evaluating the results of renal artery surgery. Technical and anatomic factors affecting the quality of the examination are discussed. The cases also illustrate the critical importance of thorough familiarity with the surgical procedures in general and of mutual discussion between surgeon and radiologist in optimizing the DISA examination in a given patient.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
McCombs PR, Berkowitz HD, Roberts B (1975) Operative management of renovascular hypertension. Ann Surg 182:762–766
Novick AC, Stewart BH, Straffon RA (1977) Autogenous arterial grafts in the treatment of renal arterial stenosis. J Urol 118:919–922
Novick AC, Stewart BH (1979) Surgical treatment of renovascular hypertension. Curr Prob Surg 16(8):1–74
Straffon RA, Siegel DF (1975) Saphenous vein bypass grafts in the treatment of renovascular hypertension. Urol Clin North Am 2:337–350
Harrington DP (1983) Renal DSA. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 6:214–223
Hillman BJ (1985) Digital radiology of the kidney. Radiol Clin North Am 23:211–225
Hillman BJ (1982) Renovascular hypertension: Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis by digital video subtraction angiography. Urol Radiol 3:219–222
Dunnick NR, Ford KK, Johnson GA, Gunnells JC (1985) Digital intravenous subtraction angiography for investigating renovascular hypertension: Comparison with hypertensive urography. South Med J 78:690–693
Hillman BJ, Zukoski CF, Ovitt TW, Ogden DA, Capp MP (1982) Evaluation of potential renal donors and renal allograft recipients: Digital video subtraction angiography. AJR 138:921–925
Schwarten DE (1974) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the renal arteries: Intravenous digital subtraction angiography for follow-up. Radiology 150:363–367
Ford KK, Braun SD, Miller GA, Newman GE, Dunnick NR (1985) Intravenous digital subtraction angiography in the preoperative evaluation of renal masses. AJR 145:323–326
Modic MT, Weinstein MA, Pavlicek W, Gallagher J, Duchesneau PM, Buonocore E, Meaney TF (1983) Intravenous digital subtraction angiography: Peripheral vs. central injection of contrast material. Radiology 147:711–715
Saddekni S, Sos T, Sniderman KW, Srur M, Bodner LJ, Kneeland JB, Cahill PT (1984) Optimal injection technique for I.V. digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 150:655–659
Novick AC, Buonocore E, Meaney TF (1982) Digital subtraction angiography for postoperative evaluation of renal artery reconstruction. J Urol 127:14–17
Morris PJ, Yadav RDS, Kincaid-Smith P, Anderton J, Hare WSC, Johnson N, Johnson W, Marshall VC (1971) Renal artery stenosis in renal transplantation. Med J Aust 1:1255–1257
Smith RB, Cosimi AB, Lordon R, Thompson AL, Ehrlich RM (1976) Diagnosis and management of arterial stenosis causing hypertension after successful renal transplantation. J Urol 115:639–642
Sniderman KW, Sos TA, Sprayregen S, Saddekni S, Cheigh JS, Tapia L, Tellis V, Veith FJ (1980) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in renal transplant arterial stenosis for relief of hypertension. Radiology 135:23–26
Rabe FE, Yune HY, Klatte EC, Miller RE (1982) Efficacy of glucagon for abdominal digital angiography. AJR 139:618–619
Seigel RS, Williams AG (1983) Efficacy of prone positioning for I.V. digital angiography of the abdomen. Radiology 148:295
Harrington DP, Boxt LM, Murray PD (1982) DSA: Overview of technical principles. AJR 139:781–786
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saeed, M., Braun, S.D., Illescas, F.F. et al. Digital intravenous substraction angiography in the evaluation of reconstructed renal arteries. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 10, 205–209 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02593871
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02593871