Abstract
A total of 65 women with ureteral stone who underwent ureteroscopy were divided randomly into two groups between April 1993 and March 1994. URS was performed under general anaesthesia in the first group (35 patients), and under local anaesthesia with sedation analgesia in the second group 930 patients). Only 2 patients of the second group did not tolerate the operation. The success rate was 88% in the first group and 83.3% in the second. There was no significant difference between the two groups. Since URS under local anaesthesia is time-saving, costeffective, and highly tolerable in women, it is a good choice for ureteral stones.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ford, T. F., Payne, S. F.: The impact of transurethral ureteroscopy on the management of ureteral calculi.Br. J. Urol., 56, 602 (1984).
Blute, M., Segura, J.: Ureteroscopy.J. Urol., 139, 510 (1988).
Rittenberg, M. H., Ellis, D. J.: Ureteroscopy under local anesthesia.Urology, 30, 475 (1987).
Chan, P. S., Fenn, J.: Transurethral ureteroscopic lithotripsy under local anesthesia and sedation.Br. J. Urol., 65, 141 (1990).
Vogeli, T., Mellin, B., Ackerman, R.: Ureteroscopy under local anesthesia with and without intravenous analgesia.Br. J. Urol., 72, 161 (1993).
Vögeli, T., Mellin, H. E.: Laserlithotripsy of ureteral calculi in, analgo-sedation with the pulsed dye lasertripter.Eur. Urol. (Suppl.),18, 375 (1990).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yalçinkaya, F., Topaloğlu, H., Özmen, E. et al. Is general anaesthesia necessary for URS in women?. International Urology and Nephrology 28, 153–156 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02550853
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02550853