References
S. Addelman, “Irregular fractions of the 2n factorial experiments,”Technometrics, 3 (1961), 479–496.
S. Addelman, “Techniques for constructing fractional replicate plans,”J. Amer. Statist. Ass., 58 (1963), 45–71.
K. S. Banerjee, “A note on fractional replication of factorial arrangements”,Sankhyā, 10 (1950), 87–94.
K. S. Banerjee and W. T. Federer, “On a special subset giving an irregular fractional replicate of a 2n factorial experiment,”J. Roy. Statist. Soc., SeriesB, 29 (1967), 292–299.
O. Kempthorne, “A simple approach to confounding and fractional replication in factorial experiments”,Biometrika, 34 (1947), 255–272.
O. Kempthorne and W. T. Federer, “The general theory of prime power lattice designs. I. Introduction and designs forp n varieties in blocks ofp plots,”Biometrics, 4 (1948), 54–79.
K. Kishen, “On the design of experiments for weighing and making other types of measurements,”Ann. Math. Statist., 16 (1945), 294–300.
A. M. Mood, “On the Hotelling weighing problem,”Ann. Math. Statist., 17 (1946), 432–446.
M. S. Patel, “On constructing the fractional replicates of the 2m designs with blocks,”Ann. Math. Statist., 33 (1962), 1440–1449.
D. Raghavarao, “Some optimum weighing designs,”Ann. Math. Statist., 30 (1959), 295–303.
B. L. Raktoe, “Application of cyclic collineations to the construction of balancedl-restrictional prime powered lattice designs,” Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 1964; andAnn. Math. Statist., 38 (1967), 1127–1141.
S. R. Webb, “Some new incomplete factorial designs,” (Abstract),Ann. Math. Statist., 33 (1962), 296.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Research supported in part by NIH Research Grant GM-05900. Paper No. BU-130 in the Biometrics Unit, and No. 518 in the Department of Plant Breeding and Biometry, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
About this article
Cite this article
Raktoe, B.L., Federer, W.T. Some non-orthogonal unsaturated main effect and resolution V plans derived from a one-restrictional lattice. Ann Inst Stat Math 21, 335–342 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02532261
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02532261