Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

System impact and methodological issues in the development of an empirical topology of psychiatric hospital residents

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
The journal of mental health administration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The identification and categorization of similar objects or individuals into groups is a universal theme that permeates science and provides a conceptual framework to facilitate comprehension. For mental health administrators, a sound methodology to group individuals in a meaningful way would prove useful in the areas of general system understanding, as well as staffing, program planning and evaluation, and service system research, to name a few. Cluster analysis is a set of techniques that approach this grouping process empirically. Within the context of a large psychiatric hospital system, both the methodological processes involved in the application of cluster analysis and the resulting utility of such an analysis are discussed. Issues fundamental to the understanding of such a system are addressed. Special emphasis is placed on methodological issues regarding the application of cluster analytic techniques, which have left such techniques open for criticism. The value of such analyses, when used appropriately, is illustrated by the development of a stable, five-group typology of psychiatric hospital residents whose group characteristics are particularly germane to service system understanding. The implications of such a model for administration, planning, and research in a psychiatric hospital system are also addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gnanadesikan R (chair), Panel on Discriminant Analysis, Classification, and Clustering: Discriminant analysis and clustering.Statistical Science 1989; 4:34–69.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tryon RC, Bailey DE:Cluster Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Green PE:Mathematical Tools for Applied Multivariate Analysis. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc., 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Seber GAF:Multivariate Observations. New York: Wiley, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Taube C, Lee ES, Forthofer RN: DRGs in psychiatry: An empirical evaluation.Medical Care 1984; 22:597–610.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Morrissev JP, Goldman HH, Klerman LV, et al.:The Enduring Asylum. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kiesler CA, Sibulkin AE:Mental Hospitalization: Myths and Facts About a National Crisis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goldman HH, Taube CA, Regier DA, et al.: The multiple functions of the state mental hospital.American Journal of Psychiatry 1983; 140:296–300.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gralnick A: Build a better state hospital: Deinstitutionalization has failed.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1985; 36:738–741.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenstein MJ, Steadman HJ, Milazzo-Sayre LJ, et al.:Statistical Note 177, Characteristics of Adminissions to the Inpatient Services of State and County Mental Hospitals, United States, 1980. DHHS Pub. No. (ADM) 86-1479. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reuter J, Gustafson DH: Need, demand, and utilization models for the mental health system. In: Kessler LG (Ed.):Operations Research and the Mental Health System. Volume I: Report of Ad Hoc Advisory Group National Institute of Mental Health, Series HN No. 1. DHHS Publication No. (ADM) 80-1018. Washington, DC: Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  12. The New York State Level of Care Survey (Form OMH 103). Albany, NY: New York State Office of Mental Health, 1988.

  13. Seber GAF:Linear Regression Analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH:Applied linear statistical models. Homewood, IL: Irwin, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weisberg S:Applied Linear Regression. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nunnally JC:Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Crocker L, Algina J:Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cochran WG:Sampling Techniques. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Honigfeld G, Gillis RD, Klett CJ: NOSIE-30: A treatment sensitive behavior scale.Psychological Reports 1966; 19:180–182.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tukey JW:Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Velleman PF, Hoaglin DC:Applications, Basics, and Computing of Exploratory Data Analysis. Boston, MA: Duxbury Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Casper ES, Donaldson B: Subgroups in the population of frequent users of inpatient services.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1990; 41:189–191.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ward JH, Jr.: Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function.American Statistical Association Journal 1963; 58:236–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Morey LC, Blashfield RK, Skinner HA: A comparison of cluster analysis techniques within a sequential validation framework.Multivariate Behavioral Research 1983; 18:309–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cattell RB: The meaning and strategic use of factor analysis. In: Cattell RB (Ed.):Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Holohean EJ, Jr., Banks SM, Maddy BA: Subgroups of psychiatric hospital residents: Implications for service system administration.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1993; 44:1002–1004.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schwartz SR, Goldfinger SM: The new chronic patient: Clinical characteristics of an emerging subgroup.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1981; 32:470–474.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pepper B, Kirshner MC, Ryglewicz H: The young adult chronic patient: Overview of a population.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1981; 33:463–469.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bachrach LL: Young adult chronic patients: An analytical review of the literature.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1982; 33:189–197.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lamb HR: Young adult chronic patients: The new drifters.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1982; 33:465–468.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tardiff K, Sweillam A: Assaultive behavior among chronic inpatients.American Journal of Psychiatry 1982; 139:212–215.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Holohean EJ, Jr., Pulice RT, Donahue SA: Utilization of acute inpatient psychiatric services: “Hevy users” in New York State.Administration and Policy in Mental Health 1991; 18:173–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kleinrock L:Queueing Systems. Volume I: Theory. New York: Wiley, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Weinstein AS, Cohen M: Young chronic patients and changes in the state hospital population.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1984; 35:595–600.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Crow TJ: Molecular pathology of schizophrenia: More than one disease process?,British Medical Journal 1980; 280:66–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Andreasen NC, Olsen S: Negative v. positive schizophrenia.Archives of General Psychiatry 1982; 39: 789–794.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Crow TJ: The two-syndrome concept: Origins and current status.Schizophrenia Bulletin 1985; 11:471–485.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lamb HR: An empirical typology of the chronically mentally ill.Community Mental Health Journal 1986; 22:21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Holohean EJ, Jr., Carpinello SE, Knight EL: Primary Self-Help Group Purpose: An Empirical Examination. Paper presented at the Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program Center for Mental Health Services, 1993 National Conference on Mental Health Statistics, Washington, DC.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Survey Research Unit, Bureau of Evaluation and Services Research, New York State Office of Mental Health, 44 Holland Avenue, 12229, Albany, NY

    Edward J. Holohean Jr. M.S. (Research Scientist)

  2. Mental Health Information Unit, Bureau of Planning Assistance and Coordination at the New York State Office of Mental Health, New York, USA

    Steven M. Banks Ph.D. (director) & Blair A. Maddy M.S. (director of the Survey Research Unit)

Authors
  1. Edward J. Holohean Jr. M.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steven M. Banks Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Blair A. Maddy M.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holohean, E.J., Banks, S.M. & Maddy, B.A. System impact and methodological issues in the development of an empirical topology of psychiatric hospital residents. The Journal of Mental Health Administration 22, 177–188 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02518757

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02518757

Keywords

Search

Navigation