Skip to main content
Log in

Expert systems as extensions of the human mind: A user oriented, holistic approach to the design of multiple reasoning system environments and interfaces

  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Expert systems have had little impact as computing artifacts. In this paper we argue that the reason for this stems from the underlying assumption of most builders of expert systems that an expert system needs to acquire information and to control the interaction between the human user and itself. We show that this assumption has serious linguistic and usability flaws which diminish the likelihood of producing socially acceptable expert systems. We propose a reversal of this paradigm, for the design of expert systems, by assuming that it is the human user who needs to acquire information and to control the interaction between themselves and the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvey (1989). DHHS Demonstrator. Department of Sociology, Surrey University, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroff, J., Simon, R., Gilman, F. and Shneiderman, B. (1988). Direct Manipulation User Interfaces for Expert Systems. In James, A. (ed.)Expert Systems: The User Interfaces. Ablex Publishing.

  • Baron, R.A., Greenberg J. (1990).Behaviour in Organisations. Allyn and Bacon.

  • Carr, C. (1989). Spreadsheet Sketches for Rule-Based Systems.AI Expert. November. 130–35.

  • Carroll, J.M. and Campbell, R.L. (1989). Artifacts as psychological theories: the case of human-computer interaction.Behaviour and Information Technology. 8. 247–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, M. and Alty, J. (1984). Expert Systems: and alternative paradigm.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 20. 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, K. and Walker, D. (1992).User-Interface Design. Prentice-Hall. (Due out in June 1992).

  • Diaper, D. (1989).Knowledge Elicitation: principles, techniques and applications. Ellis Harwood.

  • Economist (1991).Artificial Intelligence, Brain teaser, Economist August 17th 1991 pp. 62–63.

  • Garrod, S. (1987). Conceptual and Semantic Co-ordination in dialogue: Implications for Interactive Natural Language Interfaces. Proceedings of a Seminar onRecent Developments and Applications of Natural Language Understanding. 202–212. Unicorn Seminars Ltd. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N. (1988). Question and Answer Types.Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Expert Systems Conference. 162–172.

  • Gorayska, B., Lindsay, R., Cox, K., Marsh, Y. and Tse, N. (1992). Relevance-Derived Metafunction. To appear in the proceedings of the AI Simulation and Planning in Flight Autonomy Systems Conference to be held in Perth, Australia, June 24–25, 1992. IEEE Computer Society Press.

  • Gorayska, B. and Lindsay, R. (1989). On Relevance: goal dependent expressions and the control of action planning processes.TR16. Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, Oxford Polytechnic, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorayska, B. and Lindsay, R. (1991). The Roots of Relevance. Unpublished. Under review; the Journal of Pragmatics.

  • Gorayska, B., Lindsay, R., Nealon, J. and Priest, A. (1988). Natural Language Interface to Multiple Expert Systems. SERC application. Dept. of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, Oxford Polytechnic, UK. Unpublished. (Currently under construction at that department).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorayska, B., Ki, S.Y. and Tse, N. (in preparation). Varied Selective Inheritance Algorithms.

  • Gould, J.D. and Lewis, C. (1985). Designing for Usability: Key Principles and What Designers Think.Communications for the ACM, 28.3. 300–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griggs, R. and Cox, J.R. (1982). The Elusive Thematic Materials Effect in Wason's Selection Task.British Journal of Psycholg. 73.407–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helander, M. (1988). Handbook of Human Computer Interaction. Elsevier Science Publishing Company.

  • Hindin, H.J. (1990). The Thrill of Victory and the Agony of Defeat.Expert Systems. 2.1. 30–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J., Roberts, T., Verplank, B., Smith, D.C., Irby, C.H., Beard, M. and Mackey, K. (1989). The Xerox Star: A Retrospective.IEEE Computer. September. 11–29.

  • Kidd, A.L. (1985). What Do Users Ask — Some Thoughts on Diagnostic Advice.Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Expert Systems Conference. 9–20.

  • Kolodner, J. (1985). In: Bower, G.H. (ed.)The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 19. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, C.D., Walton, J.D., Shortliffe, E.H. (1986). Graphical access to medical expert systems: II. Design of an interface for physicians.Methods of Information for Medicine. 25. 143–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehnert, W.G. (1977).The Process of Question Answering. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

  • Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D. and Simi, M. (1991).Inheritance Hierarchies in Knowledge Representation and Programming Languages. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Monarch, I. and Carbonell, J. (1987). CoalSORT: A Knowledge-Based Interface.IEEE Expert. Spring. 39–53.

  • Meyer, B. (1987). Reusability: The Case for Object-Oriented Design.IEEE SOFTWARE. March. 50–63.

  • Nealon, J.L. and Crook, N. (1988). Beyond How and Why. Paper presented at Sun User Group European Conference March 1988.

  • Nealon, J.L. and Crook, N. (1987). Towards Convincing Explanations in Medical Expert Systems.Biomed. Meas. Infor. Contr. 1. 219–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1989).The Usability Engineering Lifecycle. Working Paper JN-1989-15.2. The Technical University of Denmark. Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. (1988).The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • PARLEX: Lexically-based In-depth Natural Language Understander. (1988). An Esprit project application. Contributors: J. Nealon, B. Gorayska, R. Lindsay, A Priest (Oxford Polytechnic, U.K.), W. Crombie (Hatfield Polytechnic, U.K.), R.A. Hudson (University College London, U.K.) B. Rosser (Ferranti International, U.K.), G. Adriaens (Leuven University, Belgium), U. Hahn (Passau University, Germany), RIKS (Holland). Unpublished.

  • Paetau, M. (1991). ‘Adaptive’ and ‘Cooperative’ Computer Systems — A Challenge for Sociological Research.AI & Society. 5. 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew, R.W. (1988). Human Factors Issues in Expert Systems. In Helander, M. (ed.)Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. Amsterdam: North Holland. 931–941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravden, S. and Johnson, G. (1989).Evaluating Usability of Human-Computer Interfaces. John Wiley and Sons.

  • Rutkowski, C. (1982). An Introduction to the Human Application Standard Computer Interface.Byte. 7/10. 291–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.C., Irby, ?.?., Kimball, R. and Verplank, B. (1982). Designing the Star User Interface. BYTE, April 1982: 242–282.

  • Smith, S.L., and Mosier, J.N. (1986). Guide-lines for Designing User Interface Software. Electronic Systems Division, AFSC, USAF, Hanscom AFB, MA. Mitre ESD = TR-86-278 MTR 10090.

  • Sorgaard, P. (1991). Evaluating Expert System Prototypes.AI & Society. 5. 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woherem, E.E. (1991). Human Factors in Information Technology: The Socio-Organisational Aspects of Expert Systems Design.AI & Society. 5. 18–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, C., Carroll, J., Landauer, T., John, B. and Whiteside, J. (1989). The role of Laboratory Experiments in HCI: help, hindrance, or ho-hum?.SIGCHI Bulletin (March 1989). 265–268.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Gorayska.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gorayska, B., Cox, K. Expert systems as extensions of the human mind: A user oriented, holistic approach to the design of multiple reasoning system environments and interfaces. AI & Soc 6, 245–262 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472797

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472797

Keywords

Navigation