Skip to main content
Log in

Transition from senior secondary to higher education: A learning environment perspective

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to modify and validate a new form of the College and University Classroom Environment Inventory (CUCEI), and to then use it to compare students' actual and preferred perceptions of their classroom learning environments at the senior secondary and teritary levels of education. The study also examined differences in perceptions according to the student's gender. A sample of 504 students participated in the study. The reliabilities of the scales of the modified CUCEI ranged from .73 to .94. When the two levels were compared, students at the higher education level had a less favourable perception of their learning environment. Previous research was replicated in that females were found generally to perceive their learning environments in a more positive way than did males and that all students generally preferred a more positive learning environment in their classes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Booth, A. (1997). Listening to students: experiences and expectations in the transition to a history degree.Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brendt, T., & Hawkins, J. (1985, April).The effects of friendships on studients' adjustment after the transition to high school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

  • Burkam, D. T., Lee, V. E. & Smerdon, B. A. (1997). Gender and science learning early in high school: Subject matter and laboratory experiences.American Educational Journal, 34(2), 297–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. B., Hattie, J. A., & Fraser, B. J. (1986). Student perceptions of preferred classroom learning environment.Journal of Educational Research, 81, 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, P. D., & Fraser, B. J. (1996, April).The role of school size and gender in students' perceptions of science during the transition from elementary to high school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Assciation for Research in Science Teaching, St Louis, MO.

  • Fraser, B. J. (1991). Two decades of classroom énvironment research. In B.J. Fraser, & A.J. Walberg (Eds.),Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents, consequences (pp. 3–28). London: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1994). Classroom and school climate. In D. Gabel (Ed.),Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 493–541). New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1998). Science learning environments: Assessment, effects and determinats. In B. J. Fraser, & K. G. Tobin (Eds.),The international handbook of science education (pp. 527–564). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. & Fisher, D. L. (1983).Assessment of classroom psychosocial environment: Workshop manual. Monograph in the Faculty of Education Research Seminar and Workshop Series, Western Australia Institute of Technology.

  • Fraser, B., & Fisher, D. (1994). Assessing and researching the classroom environment. In D. L. Fisher, (Ed.),The study of learning environments (Vol. 8, pp. 23–38). Perth, Western Australia: Curtin University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J., Fisher, D. L., & McRobbie, C. J. (1996, April).Development, validation and use of personal and class forms of a new classroom environment instrument. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.

  • Fraser, B. J., Giddings, G. J., & McRobbie, C. J. (1992, March).Science laboratory classroom environments: A cross-national study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Education, Boston, MA.

  • Fraser, B. J., Giddings, G. J., & McRobbie, C. J. (1995). Evolution, validation and application of a personal form of an instrument for assessing science laboratory classroom environments.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 399–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J., & Hoffman, H. (1995, April),Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in a teacher-researcher study of determinants of classroom environment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, San-Franciso, CA.

  • Fraser, B. J., Treagust, D. F., & Dennis, N. C. (1986). Development of an instrument for assessing classroom psychosocial environment in universities and colleges.Studies in Higher Education, 11(1), 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J., Treagust, D. F., Williamson, J. C., & Tobin, K. G. (1987). Validation and application of the College and University Classroom Environment Inventory (CUCEI), In B. J. Fraser (Ed.),The study of learning environments, (Vol. 2, pp. 17–30). Perth, Western Australia: Curtin University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J., & Walberg, H. J. (Eds.). (1991).Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents and consequences. London: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. W., & Thelen, H. A. (1960). The classroom as a unique system. In N. B. Henry (Ed.),The dynamics of instructional groups: Sociopsychological aspects of teaching and learning (Fifty ninth yearbook of the National society for the Study of Education, Part 2). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D., Fisher, D., & Fraser, B. (1998, April).Learning environments and student attitudes in environmental science classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego, CA.

  • Hirsch, B. J., & Rapkin, B. D. (1987). The transition to junior high school: A longitudinal study of self-Eesteem, psychological symptomatology, school life, and social support.Child Development, 58(5), 1235–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarman, R. (1990). Primary science-secondary science continuity: A new era?School Science Review, 71, 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, T. R. (1991). Cooperative learning and classroom and school climate. In B. J. Fraser, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.),Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents, and consequences (pp. 55–74). London: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killen, R. (1994). Difference between studients' and lecturers' perceptions of factors influencing studients' academic success at university.Higher Education Research and Development, 13(2), 199–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, T. K. (1995). Perceptions of classroom environment, school types, gender and learning styles of secondary school students.Educational Psychology, 15(2), 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, C., Eccles, J. E., & Feldlaufer, H. (1991). Classroom Environments and the transition to junior high school. In B. J. Fraser, & A. J. Walberg (Eds.),Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents, consequences (pp. 113–139). London: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair, C., & Fisher, D. (1999, August).A learning environment study of tertiary classrooms. Paper presented at the annual research forum of the Western Australian Institute for Educational Research, Perth, WA.

  • Owens, L. C. & Straton, R. G. (1980). The development of a cooperative, competitive and individualised learning preference scale for students.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 147–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, L. H., Rennie, L. J., & Harding, J. (1995). In B. J. Fraser, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.),Improving science education (pp. 18–21), Chicago, IL: The National Society for Study of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, C., & Cotterell, J. (1981).Changes in students in the transition between primary and secondary school. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Publishing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1991). Study processes in grade 12 environments. In B. J. Fraser, & A. J. Walberg (Eds.),Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents, consequences (pp. 215–229). London: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P., & Entwistle, N.J. (1981). Effects of academic department on students' approaches to studying.British Journal of Education Psychology, 51, 368–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P., Martin, E., & Bowden, J. A. (1987).Approaches to studying in different high school environments. (Research Working Paper 87.12), Melbourne, Victoria: Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P., Patrick, K., & Martin, E., (1988, November).Variation in school environments in the final year. Paper presented at annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Armidale, NSW.

  • Richter, R. (1997). The transition from secondary to higher education in Germany.Quality in Higher Education, 3(2), 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickards, T. W., Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B. J. (1997, March).Teacher-student interpersonal behaviour, cultural background and gender in science classes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Chicago, IL.

  • Stevens, J. (1992).Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez, M., Pias, R., Membiela, P., & Dapia, D. (1998). Classroom environment in the implementation of an innovative curriculum project in science education.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 655–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, R. A., & Jensen, R. A. (1993). How exemplary teachers perceive their school environments. In D. L. Fisher (Ed.),The study of learning environments (Vol. 7, pp. 94–105). Perth, WA: Curtin University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., & Fraser, B. J. (1998). Qualitative, and quantitative landscapes of classroom learning environments. In B. J. Fraser, & K. G. Tobin (Eds.),The international handbook of science education (pp. 623–640). Dordrecht, The Netherlands Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., & Fraser, B. J. (Eds.) (1987)Exemplary practice in science and mathematics education. Perth, WA: Curtin University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., & Gallagher, J. J. (1987). What happens, in high school science classrooms.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 549–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., Kahle, J. B., Fraser, B. J. (Eds.) (1990).Windows into science classes: Problems associated with higher level cognitive learning. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trebilco, G. R., Atkinson, E. P., & Atkinson, J. M. (1977, November.),The transition of students from primary to secondary school. Paper presented at annual meeting of Australian Association for Research in Education, Canberra ACT.

  • Vahala, M. E., & Winston, R. B. (1994). College classroom environments: Disciplinary and institutional-type differences and effects on academic achievement in introductory courses.Innovative Higher Education, 19(2), 99–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villar, L. M. (1994, April).Reflections on action by university teacher trainers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

  • Walberg, H. J. (1981). A psychological theory of educational productivity. In F. Farley, & N. Gordon (Eds.),Psychology and education (pp. xx-yy). Berkely, CA: McCutchan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walberg, H. J. (1984). Improving the productivity of America's schools.Educational Leadership, 41(8), 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walberg, H. J., Fraser, B. J., & Welch, W. W. (1986). A test, of a model of educational productivity among senior high school students.Journal of Educational Research, 79, 133–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waxman, H. C., Huang, S. Y., & Wang, M. C. (April, 1996).Investigating classroom learning environments of resilient and non-resilient students from inner-city elementary schools. Paper presented at the annual, meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.

  • Wong, A., & Fraser, B. (1994). Science laboratory classroom environments and student attitudes in chemistry classes in Singapore. In D. L. Fisher, (Ed.),The study of learning tenvironments (Vol. 8, pp. 52–71). Perth, WA: Curtin University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chenicheri Sid Nair.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nair, C.S., Fisher, D.L. Transition from senior secondary to higher education: A learning environment perspective. Research in Science Education 30, 435–450 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461561

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461561

Keywords

Navigation