Skip to main content
Log in

A morphogenetic system matched to a group

  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A period of morphogenesis is operationally defined as a system. This period precedes cell differentiation and is axially expressed. Six interacting elements of structure are defined utilizing Spemann and Mangold's heteroplastic transplantation experiments. The system generates thirty-six interactions, given a rule of composition and specific premises. The element set and operation is matched to the symmetric group S3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Ashby, W. R. 1962. “Principles of the Self-Organizing System.” InPrinciples of Self Organization, Von Foerster, H. and G. W. Zopf, eds. New York: Pergamon Press, pp. 255–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bautzmann, H. 1933. “Über Determinationsgrad und Wirkungsbezichungen der Randzonenteilanlagen (Chorda, Ursegmente Seitenplatten und Kopfdarmanlage) bei Urodelen und Anuren.”Roux's Arch.,128, 666–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyden, A. 1969. “Homology and Analogy.”Science,164, 455–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgman, P. W. 1946.The Logic of Modern Physics. New York: Macmillan, p. 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blechschmidt, E. 1963.The Human Embryo. Stuttgart: Schattauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobstein, C. 1952. “Effect of Fragmentation of Mouse Embryonic Shilds on their Differentiative Behavior After Culturing.”J. Exp. Zool.,120, 437–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M., Jr. 1959.The Theory of Groups. New York: Macmillan.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. G. 1936. “Relations of Symmetry in the Developing Ear ofAmblystoma punctatum.”Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.,22, 238–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1945. “Relations of Symmetry in the Developing Embryo.”Trans. Conn. Acad. Arts Sci.,36, 277–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, E. D. 1968. “Organization and Fine Structure of Epithelium and Mesenchyme in the Developing Chick Embryo, in Epithelial Mesenchymal Interactions.”18th Hahnemann Symposium, Fleishmajer, R. and R. Billingham, eds. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, pp. 31–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtfreter, J. 1933. “Die Totale Exogastrulation, Eine Selbstablösung Des Ektoderms Vom Entomesoderm. Entwicklung Und Funktionelles Verhalten Nervenloser Organe.”Roux's Arch.,129, 670–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1939. “Gewebeaffinitat ein Mittle der Embryonalen Formbildung.”Arch. Exp. Zellforsch.,23, 169–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and V. Hamburger. 1955.Analysis of Development. Willier, B., P. Weiss and V. Hamburger, eds. Philadelphia: Saunders, pp. 230–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, R. O. 1969. “An Electron Microscopic Study of Chordamesoderm Neurectoderm Association in a Gastrula of the ToadXenopus laevis.”J. Exp. Zool.,172 (2) 153–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, M. L. 1968. “Genesis of Cancer (a Temporal Approach).”J. Postgrad. Med.,14, 49–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopashov, G. V. 1935. “Die Entwicklungsleistungen des Gastrulaektoderms in Abhängigkeit von Veränderungen der Masse.”Biol. Zbl.,55, 606–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, E. E. 1959.The Kinetics of Cellular Proliferation. Stohlman, F., Jr., ed. New York: Grune & Stratton, pp. 282–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, S. R. 1969. “The Care and Feeding of Embryos.”Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet.,7 (2), 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxen, L. and S. Toivonen. 1962.Primary Embryonic Induction. London: Logos Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithberg, M. 1954. “The Origin and Development of the Tail in the Frog,Rana pipiens.”J. Exp. Zool.,127, 397–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spemann, H. 1967.Embryonic Development and Induction. New York: Hafner.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Mangold, H. 1924. “Über Induktion von Embryonalanlagen Durch Implantation Artfremder Organisatoren.”Roux's Arch. Ent. Org.,100, 599–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toivonen, S. and L. Saxen. 1968. “Morphogenetic Interactions of Presumptive Neural and Mesodermal Cells Mixed in Different Ratios.”Science,159, 539–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, C. H. 1966.Principles of Development and Differentiation. New York: Macmillan, p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, L. 1969. “Positional Information and the Spatial Pattern of Cellular Differentiation.”J. Theor. Biology,25, 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, T. 1940. “Beeinflussung der Differenzierungsleistung des Isolierten Mesoderms von Molchkeimen durch Zugefügtes Chorda- und Neuralmaterial.”Okajimas Fol. anat. Japan. 19, 131–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1950. “Regional Differentiation of the Isolated Ectoderm of theTriturus gastrula Induced Through a Protein Extract.”Embryologia,1, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kharasch, J.A. A morphogenetic system matched to a group. Bltn Mathcal Biology 35, 615–625 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458366

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458366

Keywords

Navigation