Abstract
This review of social science bibliometric literature seeks to establish characteristics of the social science literature and to understand their consequences for the coverage of literature databases and for interpretation of bibliometric social science indicators based on such databases. The paper reviews what we know about social science publishing and database coverage of it. It examines the main reasons why social science bibliometrics are problematic, namely: the centrality of books in social science literature and their high citation rate; and the national orientation of social science literatures. The paper then looks at reasons why social science bibliometrics holds increasing promise, namely: increasing internationalization; and good coverage of scholarly journals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bourke, P., L. Butler, B. Biglia (1996),Monitoring Research in the Periphery: Australia and the ISI Indices, Research Evaluation and Policy Project, Monograph Series No. 3, 72p.
Broadus, R. N. (1971), The literature of the social sciences: A survey of citation studies,International Social Sciences Journal, 23, 236–243.
Burnhill, P. M., M. E. Tubby-Hille (1994), On measuring the relation between social science research activity and research publication,Research Evaluation, 4, 3, 130–152.
Cronin, B., H. Snyder, H. Atkins (1997), Comparative citation rankings of authors in monographic and journal literature: A study of sociology,Journal of Documentation, 53, 3, 263–273.
De Looze, M. et al. (1996), Determining the core of journals of a research centre: The example of researchers from the Department of Rural Economy and Sociology of the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, France,Scientometrics, 36, 2, 167–183.
Delamont, S. (1989), Citation and social mobility research: self-defeating behaviour,Sociological Review, 37, 2, 332–337.
Dorban, M., A. F. Van Devenne (1992), Bibliometric analysis of bibliographic behaviours in economic sciences,Scientometrics, 25, 1, 149–165.
Glänzel, W. (1996), A bibliometric approach to social sciences. National research performances in 6 selected social science areas, 1990–1992,Scientometrics, 35, 3, 291–307.
Hargens, L. L., H. Schuman (1990), Citation counts and social comparisons: Scientists' use and evaluation of citation index data.Social Science Research, 19, 205–221.
Hicks, D., J. Potter (1991), Sociology of scientific knowledge: A reflexive citation analysis or science disciplines and disciplining science,”Social Studies of Science, 21, 459–501.
Kyvik, S. (1988), Internationality of the social sciences: the Norwegian case,”International Social Science Journal, 163–172.
Lemoine, W., E. N. Ling, B. R. Martin (Ed.),State-of-the-art Review of Research Supported by the ESRC in the Industry, Economy and Environment Fields: A Bibliometric Analysis, SPRU, Bringhton.
Lindholm-romantschuk, Y., J. Warner (1996), The role of monographs in scholarly communication: An empirical study of philosophy, sociology and economics,”Journal of Documentation, 52, 4, 389–404.
Narin, F. (1976),Evaluative Bibliometrics: The Use of Publication and Citation Analysis in the Evaluation of Scientific Activity, Computer Horizons, Inc., Cherry Hill, NJ.
Nederhof, A. J., E. Van Wijk (1997), Mapping the social and behavioral sciences world-wide: Use of maps in portfolio analysis of national research efforts”,Scientometrics, 40, 2, 237–276.
Nederhof, A. J., R. F. Meijer, H. F. Moed, A. F. J. Van Raan (1993), Research performance indicators for university departments: A study of an agricultural university,”Scientometrics, 27, 2, 157–178.
Nederhof, A. J., A. F. J. Van Raan (1993), A bibliometric analysis of six economics research groups: A comparison with peer review,”Research Policy, 22, 353–368.
Nederhof, A. J., R. A. Zwaan (1991), Quality judgments of journals as indicators of research performance in the humanities and the social and behavioral sciences,”Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 5, 332–340.
Nederhof, A. J., R. A. Zwaan, R. E. Debruin, P. J. Dekker (1989), Assessing the usefulness of bibliometric indicators for the humanities and the social and behavioral sciences: A comparative study,”Scientometrics, 15, 5–6, 423–435.
Nederhof, A. J. (1989), Books and chapters are not to be neglected in measuring research productivity,American Psychologist, 734–735.
Persson, O. (1985), Scandinavian social science in international journals,Social Science Information Studies, 5, 185–190.
Pestaña, A., I. Gómez, M. T. Fernández, M. A. Zulueta, A. Méndez (1995), Scientometric evaluation of R&D activities in medium-size institutions: A case study based on the Spanish Scientific Research Council (CSIC), inThe Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics,M. Koenig andA. Bookstein (Eds.), 425–434.
Pierce, S. (1987), Characteristics of professional knowledge structures: Some theoretical implications of citation studies,LISR, 9, 143–171.
Royle, P., R. Over (1994), The use of bibliometric indicators to measure the research productivity of Australian academics,Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 25, 2, 77–88.
Schoepflin, U. (1990), Problems of representativity in the Social Sciences Citation Index, In:Representations of Science and Technology, Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Bielefeld, Germany, 10–12 June,P. Weingart, R. Sehringer andM. Winterhager (Eds.), 1992 DSWO Press, 177–188.
Tijssen, R. J. W., Th. N. Van Leeuwen, B. Verspagen, M. Slabbers (1996),Wetenschapsen Technologie-Indicatoren 1996, Het Nederlands Observatorium van Wetenschap en Technologie: Centrum voor Wetenschaps—en Technologie-Studies (CWTS) en Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT) in opdracht van het Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschappen, Zoetermeer, (ISBN 90-75023-03-0), 223p.
Thomas, P. (1998),A Bibliometric Analysis Of Fashions In Management Literature, unpublished PhD thesis, Nottingham Trent University.
Thorsteinsdottir, H. (1998),Islands Reaching Out, unpublished DPhil thesis, University of Sussex.
Van Der Meulen, B., L. Leydesdorff (1991), Has the study of philosophy at Dutch universities changed under economic and political pressures?”Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16, 3, 288–321.
Van Raan, A. F. J. (1998), Assessment of social sciences: the use of advanced bibliometric methods as a necessary complement of peer review,Research Evaluation, 7, 1, 2–6.
Villagrá Rubio, A. (1992), Scientific production of Spanish universities in the fields of social sciences and language,Scientometrics, 24, 1, 3–19.
Webster, B. M. (1998), Polish Sociology Citation Index as an example of usage of national citation indexes in scientometric analysis of social science,Journal of Information Science, 24, 1, 19–32.
Winclawska, B. M. (1996), Polish Sociology Citation Index (Principles for creation and the first results),Scientometrics, 35, 3, 387–391.
Winterhager, M. (1994), Bibliometrische Basisdaten zur Entwicklung der Sozialwissenschaften in Deutschland, inBest, H. et al. (Hrsg.):Informations-und Wissensverarbeitung in den Sozial-wissenschaften. Opladen 1994, 539–551.
Yitzhaki, M. (1998), The language preference in sociology,Scientometrics, 41, 1–2, 243–254.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hicks, D. The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences. Scientometrics 44, 193–215 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457380
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457380