Skip to main content
Log in

Alternatives to the SQUID magnetometer for some biomagnetic measurements

  • Published:
Il Nuovo Cimento D

Summary

Flux gate and resonance type of magnetometers (free precession, optically pumped), which can in some cases replace the SQUID magnetometer, are discussed. The principles of operation, sensitivity, dynamical range and frequency response are described. The application of these magnetometers for biomagnetic measurements is mentioned.

Riassunto

Si discutono magnetometri del tipo del flussometro elettronico e di risonanza (precisione libera, pompata otticamente) che possono in qualche caso sostituire il magnetometro SQUID. Si descrivono i princípi di funzionamento, la sensibilità, l’intervallo dinamico e la risposta di frequenza. Si dà un accenno riguardo l’applicazione di questi magnetometri nelle misurazioni biomagnetiche.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. M. Baule andR. McFee:Am. Heart J.,66, 95 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Aschenbrenner andG. Gaubau:Hochfrequenztech. Elektroakust.,47, 177 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. W. La Pierre: U. S. Patent 2053154 (September 1936).

  4. H. Antranikian: U. S. Patent 2047609 (July 1936).

  5. V. Vacquier, R. F. Simons andA. W. Hull:Rev. Sci. Intrum.,18, 483 (1947).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. F. Foerster:Nondestr. Test. (Chicago),13, 31 (September–October 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. H. Acuña:IEEE Trans. Magn., MAG-10, 519 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. K. W. Behannon, M. H. Acuña, L. F. Burlaga, R. P. Lepping andN. F. Ness:Space Sci. Rev.,21, 235 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. E. Zavoisky:J. Phys. USSR,9, 211, 245, 447 (1945);F. Bloch, W. W. Hansen andM. E. Packard:Phys. Rev.,70, 474 (1946);E. M. Purcell, H. C. Torrey andR. V. Pound:Phys. Rev.,69, 37 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. E. Packard andR. Varian:Phys. Rev.,93, 941 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. I. Gordon andR. E. Brown:IEEE Trans. Magn., MAG-8, 76 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. V. Marshall:IEEE Trans. Magn., MAG-3, 459 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. H. Acuña andC. J. Pellerin:IEEE Trans. Geosci. Electron., GE-7, 252 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. Primdahl:IEEE Trans. Magn., MAG-6, 2, 367 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. K. Aittoniemi, K. Kalliomaeki, T. Katila andT. Varpula:Biomagnetism, edited byS. N. Erné, H. D. Hahlbohm andH. Lübbig (Berlin and New York, N. Y., 1981), p. 475.

  16. P. A. Grivet andL. Malnar:Adv. Electron. Electron Phys.,23, 39 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, S. Haroche andF. Laloë:Rev. Phys. Appl.,5, 95, 102 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  18. F. Hartmann:IEEE Trans. Magn., MAG-8, 66 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. N. Livanov, A. N. Kozlov, A. V. Korinevskij, V. P. Markin, C. E. Sineljnikova andJu. A. Holodov:Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,238, 253 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trontelj, Z., Lužnik, J. & Pirnat, J. Alternatives to the SQUID magnetometer for some biomagnetic measurements. Il Nuovo Cimento D 2, 214–223 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02455925

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02455925

PACS. 87.40

Navigation