Skip to main content
Log in

Anthropologies of art

  • Published:
International Journal of Anthropology

Abstract

This paper discusses how different conceptions of the idea of ‘anthropology’ entail different views of the ‘anthropology of art’. The prevailing notion of anthropology as the Western study of small-scale non-Western societies leads to a conception of the anthropology of art as dealing with the visual arts of these societies or cultures. Anthropology is sometimes also interpreted as referring to a particular approach that is applicable in examining sociocultural phenomena in whatever culture, including its art forms. Both conceptions of anthropology may be considered subsidiary to a more encompassing view of anthropology as the multidisciplinary study of humankind. Following this view, the anthropology of art becomes the comprehensive examination of art in human existence. As such it would coincide with World Art Studies, conceived as the global and multidisciplinary study of the visual arts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Adams M., 1989. African Visual Arts from an Art Historical Perspective. African Studies Review 32(2): 55–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiken N.E., 1998. The Biological Origins of Art. Westport, CT, London. Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R.L., 1979. Art in Primitive Societies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall (second ed. Art in Small-Scale Societies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1990. Calliope's Sisters. A Comparative Study of Philosophies of Art. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. (second ed. Calliope's Sisters. The Role of Art in Human Though. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 2000. American Muse. Anthropological Excursions into Art and Aesthetics, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R.L. and Field K.L. (eds), 1993. Art in Small-Scale Societies. Contemporary Readings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong R.P., 1971. The Affecting Presence. An Essay in Humanistic Anthropology. Urbana, Chicago, London: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnaut K., 2001. A pragmatic impulse in the anthropology of art? Alfred Gell and the semiotics of social objects. Journal des Africanistes 71(2): 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedaux J.B. and Cooke B. (eds), 1999. Sociobiology and the Arts. Amsterdam, Atlanta, GA: Editions Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlo J.C. (ed.), 1992. The Early Years of Native American Art History. The Politics of Scholarship and Collecting, Seattle, London: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlo J.C. and Wilson L.A. (eds), 1993. Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas. Selected Readings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biebuyck D. (ed.), 1969. Tradition and Creativity in Tribal Art. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blier S.P., 1992. First Word. African Arts 25(3): 1, 8, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boas F., 1927. Primitive Art. Oslo: Instituttet for Sammenlignende Kulturforskning (reprint New York: Dover, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti J. and Brilliant R., 1990. Likeness and Beyond. Portraits from Africa and the World. New York: The Museum for African Art.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers F.G., 1978. Teaching and Studying Art History. Some Anthropological and Sociological Considerations, Studies in Art Education 20(1): 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coe K., 2003. The Ancestress Hypothesis. Visual Art as Adaptation. New Brunswick, N.J., Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke B. and Turner F. (eds), 1999. Biopoetics. Evolutionary Explorations in the Arts. Lexington, KT: International Conference on the Unity of the Sciences.

  • Coote J., 1992. “Marvels of Everyday Vision’: The Anthropology of Aesthetics and the Cattle-Keeping Nilotes. In: Anthropology, Art, and Aesthetics, ed. J. Coote and A. Shelton, pp. 245–73. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coote J. and Shelton A. (eds), 1992. Anthropology, Art, and Aesthetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordwell J.M. (ed.), 1979. The Visual Arts. Plastic and Graphic. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • d'Azevedo W.L. (ed.), 1973. The Traditional Artist in African Societies. Bloomington, London: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dissanayake E., 1988. What is Art For? Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1992. Homo Aestheticus. Where Art Comes From and Why. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 2000. Art and Intimacy. How the Arts Began. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton D., 2003. Aesthetics and Evolutionary Psychology. In: Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics, ed. J. Levinson, pp. 693–705. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etcoff N., 1999. Survival of the Prettiest. The Science of Beauty. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferie E. (ed.), 1995. Art History and its Methods. A Critical Anthology. London: Phaidon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores T., 1978. Undefining Art: Irrelevant Categorization in the Anthropology of Aesthetics. Dialectical Anthropology 3(2): 129–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1985. The Anthropology of Aesthetics. Dialectical Anthropology 10(1/2): 27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forge A. (ed.), 1973. Primitive Art and Society. London, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest J., 1988. Lord I'm Coming Home. Everyday Aesthetics in Tidewater North Carolina. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser D., 1962. Primitive Art. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, (ed.), 1966. The Many Faces of Primitive Art. A Critical Anthology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell A., 1998. Art and Agency. An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbrands A.A., 1957. Art as an Element of Culture, Especially in Negro-Africa. Leiden: E.J. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1967. Wow Ipits. Eight Asmat Woodcarvers of New Guinea. The Hague, Paris: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graburn N.H. (ed.), 1976. Ethnic and Tourist Arts. Cultural Expressions of the Fourth World, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh M. and Megaw V. (eds), 1978. Art in Society. Studies in Style, Culture and Aesthetics. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haselberger H., 1969. Kunstethnologie. Grundbegriffe, Methoden, Darstellung, Wien, München: Verlag Anton Schroll.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher E.P., 1985. Art as Culture. An Introduction to the Anthropology of Art. Lanham, New York, London: University Press of America (second ed. Westport, CT, London: Bergin and Garvey 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonaitis A. (ed.), 1995. A Wealth of Thought. Franz Boas on Native American Art. Seattle, London: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jopling C.F. (ed.), 1971. Art and Aesthetics in Primitive Societies. New York: E. P. Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreide-Damani I., 1992. KunstEthnologie. Zum Verständinis fremder Kunst. Köln: DuMont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton, R., 1981. The Anthropology of Art. London: Granada (second ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 2003. Art and Agency: A Reassement Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 9(3): 447–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maquet J., 1971. Introduction to Aesthetic Anthropology. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley (second ed. Malibu, Undena, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1986. The Aesthetic Experience. An Anthropologist Looks at the Visual Arts, New Haven, London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus G.E. and Myers F.R. (eds), 1995. The Traffic in Culture. Refiguring Art and Anthropology. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacClancy J. (ed.), 1997. Contesting Art. Art, Politics and Identity in the Modern World, Oxford, New York: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller G., 2000. The Mating Mind. How Sexual Selection Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithen S., 1996. The Prehistory of the Mind. The Cognitive Origins of Art, Religion and Science. London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morphy H., 1994. The Anthropology of Art. In: Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology, ed. T. Ingold, pp. 648–85. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napier A.D., 1986. Masks, Transformation, and Paradox. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onians J., 1996. World Art Studies and the Need for a New Natural History of Art Art Bulletin 78(2): 206–09.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otten C.M. (ed.), 1971. Anthropology and Art. Readings in Cross-Cultural Aesthetics. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petridis C. (ed.), 2001. Frans M. Olbrechts 1899–1958. In Search of Art in Africa. Antwerp: Ethnographic Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips R.B., 1995. Fielding Culture: Dialogues between Art History and Anthropology. Museum Anthropology 18(1): 39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips R.B. and Steiner C.B. (eds), 1999. Unpacking Culture. Art and Commodity in Colonial and Postcolonial Worlds. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinney C. and Thomas N. (eds), 2001. Beyond Aesthetics. Art and the Technologies of Enchantment. Oxford, New York: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plattner S., 1996. High Art Down Home. An Economic Ethnography of a Local Art Market. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughley N., 2000. On Being Humans. An Introduction. In: Being Humans. Anthropological Universality and Particularity in Transdisciplinary Perspectives, ed. N. Roughley, pp. 1–21. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin A. (ed.), 1988. The Mark of Civilization. Artistic Transformations of the Human Body. Los Angeles: Museum of Cultural History, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin A., 1989. Art as Technology. The Arts of Africa, Oceania, Native America, and Southern California (completed and edited by Zena Pearlstone). Beverly Hills, CA: Hillcrest Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharfstein B.-A., 1988. Of Birds, Beasts, and Other Artists. An Essay on the University of Art. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharfstein B.-A., forthcoming. A Prelude to World Art.

  • Schomburg-Scherff S., 1986. Grundzüge einer Ethnologie der Ästhetik, Frankfurt am Main, New York: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore B., 2000. Human Diversity and Human Nature. The Life and Times of a False Dichotomy. In: Being Humans. Anthropological Universality and Particularity in Transdisciplinary Perspectives, ed. N. Roughley, pp. 81–103. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver H., 1979. Ethnoart. Annual Review of Anthropology 8: 267–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith M.W. (ed.), 1961. The Artist in Tribal Society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stagl J., 2000. Anthropological Universality. On the Validity of Generalisations about Human Nature. In: Being Humans. Anthropological Universality and Particularity in Transdisciplinary Perspectives, ed. N. Roughley, pp. 25–36. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas N. and Losche D. (eds), 1999. Double Vision. Art Histories and Colonial Histories in the Pacific. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Damme W., 1996. Beauty in Context. Towards an Anthropological Approach to Aesthetics. Leiden, New York, Köln: E.J. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 2000. Universality and Cultural Particularity in Visual Aesthetics. In: Being Humans. Universality and Particularity in Transdisciplinary Perspectives, ed. N. Roughley, pp. 258–83. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 2001. World Art Studies and World Aesthetics: Partners in Crime? In: Raising the Eyebrow. John Onians and World Art Studies, ed. L. Golden, pp. 309–19. Oxford: Archaeopress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Damme W., forthcoming. World Aesthetics: Biology, Culture, and Reflection. In: Compression vs. Expression. Containing and Explaining the World's Art, ed. J. Onians. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • Willet F., 1971. African Art. An Introduction. London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wingert P.S., 1962. Primitive Art. Its Traditions and Styles. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Wilfried, D. Anthropologies of art. Int. J. Anthropol. 18, 231–244 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02447908

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02447908

Keywords

Navigation