Skip to main content
Log in

Ultimate self-responsibility, practical reasoning, and practical action: Habermas, Husserl, and ethnomethodology on discourse and action

  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Adorno, T.Negative Dialectic. New York: Seabury Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baier, K.The Moral Point of View. New York: Random House, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baier, K., & Toulmin, S. E. On Describing.Philosophy and Ordinary Language. C. E. Caton (Ed.). Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beardsmore, R. W.Moral Reasoning. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, A., McHugh, P., Heap, J., Misgeld, D., & Silvers, R.The Study of Self-Reflection and the Problem of Children's Culture. A Research Proposal submitted to The Canada Council, July, 1977.

  • Gadamer, H. G.Warheit und Methode. Tuebingen, Germany: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1960. English edition:Truth and Method New York: Seabury Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. A Conception of, and Experiments with, Trust as a Condition of Stable Concerted Action.Motivation and Social Interaction. In O. J. Harvey (Ed.). New York: Ronald Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H.Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, D.Practical Reasoning: The Structure and Foundations of Prudential and Moral Arguments and Their Exemplification in Discourse. Oxford: Oxford, at the Clarendon Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston: Beacon Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.Theory and Practice. Boston: Beacon Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. Some Distinctions in Universal Pragmatics.Theory and Society, (Vol. 3). No. 2 (Summer 1976), 155–169. (a)

  • Habermas, J. “Was heisst Universal pragmatik?”Sprachpragmatik und Philosophie, K. O. Apel. (Ed.), Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1976, 174–273. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. Einige Bemerkungen zur sociologischen Handlungstheorie. Unpublished lecture text, York University, Toronto, 1976. (c)

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. A review of Gadamer's Truth and Method.Understanding and Social Inquiry. In F. R. Dallmayr&T. A. McCarthy (Ed.). Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1977, 335–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. M.The Language of Morals. New York: Oxford University Press, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. M.Freedom and Reason. Oxford: The Claredon Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M.Sein und Zeit. Tuebingen, Germany: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M. Traditional and Critical Theory.Critical Theory. New York: Herder & Herder, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, W. D. (Ed.),The Is/Ought Question. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E.The Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Philosophy. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovesi, J.Moral Notions. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, P. A Common Sense Conception of Deviance.Recent Sociology. (Vol. 2.) In H. P. Dreitzel (Ed.), New York: Macmillan, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misgeld, D. Discourse and Conversation: The Theory of Communicative Competence and Hermeneutics in the Light of the Debate between Habermas and Gadamer.Cultural Hermeneutics. (Vol. 4). 321–344, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misgeld, D.The Philosophy of Moral Practices and the Sociological Approach toward a Study of the Moral Requiredness of Practical Actions. Paper presented to the Canadian Philosophical Association, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, June 1978. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Misgeld, D.Language, Interest, and Self-Reflection: The Rationality of Social Actors and the Rationality of Theory in Habermas' Metatheoretical Reflections on Knowledge and Human Interests.” Paper presented in the Theory Section of the American Sociological Association Meetings, San Francisco, September 8, 1978. (b)

  • Nielsen, K. Social Science and Hard Data.Cultural Hermeneutics, (Vol. 1). 1973, 115–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K. Rationality and Relativism.Philosophy of the Social Sciences, (Vol. 4). December, 1974. (a).

  • Nielsen, K. Principles of Rationality.Philosophical Papers, (Vol. III). October, 1974. (b)

  • Nielsen, K. Conceptual Relativism.Grazer Philosophische Studien, (Vol. 3). 1977. (a)

  • Nielsen, K. Unsere wohlerwogenen Urteile.Ratio, 19. Band, Heftl, 1977. (b)

  • Norman, R.Reasons for Action. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. Z., & Mounce, H. O.Moral Practices. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhees, R.Discussions of Wittgenstein. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhees, R.Without Answers. New York: Schocken Books, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudnow, D. Counting Deaths.Ethnomethodology, In R. Turner (Ed.), Harmondsworth, England: Penguin, 1974, 102–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Ch.Hegel, London, Cambridge University Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. (ed.).Ethnomethodology. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, P.The Idea of a Social Science. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, P.Ethics and Action. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Misgeld, D. Ultimate self-responsibility, practical reasoning, and practical action: Habermas, Husserl, and ethnomethodology on discourse and action. Hum Stud 3, 255–278 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02331813

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02331813

Keywords

Navigation