Abstract
This study examines the relationship between selected Chicago Board Options Exchange option volume and underlying stock prices using intraday data for the period January 3, 1989 to January 31, 1989. The data were prefiltered and aggregated into 15-minute intervals. Causality tests were performed using Granger's method. The test results indicate that the option volume-stock price relationship is largely characterized by feedback, with option volume causing stock price changes and vice versa. The evidence also suggests that the relationship only persists for very short time periods, with little or no opportunity for market participants to devise profitable trading strategies utilizing one market's information in the other market.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anthony, J. H. "The Interrelation of Stock and Options Market Trading Volume Data,"Journal of Finance, 43, September 1988, pp. 949–64.
Bhattacharya, M. "Price Changes of Related Securities: The Case of Call Options and Stocks,"Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 22, March 1987, pp. 1–15.
Billingsley, R. S.; Chance, D. M. "Put-Call Ratios and Market Timing Effectiveness,"Journal of Portfolio Management, 15, Fall 1988, pp. 15–28.
Chan, K.; Chan, K. C.; Karolyi, G. A. "Transmissions of Volatility Between Stock Index and Stock Index Futures Markets,"Review of Financial Studies, 4, 1991, pp. 657–84.
Chance, D. M.An Introduction to Options and Futures, 2nd ed., Chicago, IL: Dryden Press, 1991.
__. "Option Volume and Stock Market Performance,"Journal of Portfolio Management, 17, Summer 1990, pp. 42–51.
Chiras, D. P.; Manaster, S. "The Information Content of Option Prices and a Test of Market Efficiency,"Journal of Financial Economics, 6, 1978, pp. 213–34.
Detemple, J.; Seldon, L. "A General Equilibrium Analysis of Option and Stock Market Interactions,"International Economic Review, 32, May 1991, pp. 279–302.
Easley, D.; O'Hara, M.; Srinvas, P. S. "Option Volume and Stock Prices: Evidence on Where Informed Traders Trade," Cornell University Working Paper, May 1994.
Finucane, T. "Put-Call Parity and Expected Returns,"Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 26, December 1991, pp. 445–57.
Granger, C. W. J. "Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods,"Econometrica, 37, July 1969, pp. 424–38.
Granger, C. W. J.; Newbold, P.Forecasting Economic Time Series, 2nd ed., Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1986.
Manaster, S.; Rendleman, Jr., R. J. "Option Prices as Predictors of Equilibrium Stock Prices,"Journal of Finance, 37, September 1982, pp. 1043–47.
Pankratz, A.Forecasting with Univariate Box-Jenkins Models, New York, NY: John Wiley, 1983.
Panton, D. "Chicago Board Call Options as Predictors of Common Stock Price Changes,"Journal of Econometrics, 4, January 1976, pp. 101–13.
Schroeder, T. C.; Goodwin, B. K. "Price Discovery and Cointegration for Live Hogs,"Journal of Futures Markets, 11, December 1991, pp. 669–84.
Schwarz, T. V.; Laatsch, F. E. "Dynamic Efficiency and Price Leadership in Stock Index Cash and Futures Markets,"Journal of Futures Markets, 11, December 1991, pp. 669–84.
Stephan, J. A.; Whaley, R. E. "Intraday Price Change and Trading Volume Relations in the Stock and Stock Option Markets,"Journal of Finance, 45, March 1990, pp. 191–219.
Stoll, H. R.; Whaley, R. E. "The Dynamics of Stock Index and Stock Index Futures Returns,"Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 25, December 1990, pp. 441–68.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Data for the study were generously provided by Itzhak Krinsky and Jason Lee of the DeGroote School.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boluch, M.J., Chamberlain, T.W. Option volume and stock price behavior: Some evidence from the Chicago board options exchange. Atlantic Economic Journal 25, 358–370 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298346
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298346