Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of generalized and modified sample biserial correlation estimators

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a recent paper, Bedrick derived the asymptotic distribution of Lord's modified sample biserial correlation estimator and studied its efficiency for bivariate normal populations. We present a more detailed examination of the properties of Lord's estimator and several competitors, including Brogden's estimator. We show that Lord's estimator is more efficient for three nonnormal distributions than a generalization of Pearson's sample biserial estimator. In addition, Lord's estimator is reasonably efficient relative to the maximum likelihood estimator for these distributions. These conclusions are consistent with Bedrick's results for the bivariate normal distribution. We also study the small sample bias and variance of Lord's estimator, and the coverage properties of several confidence interval estimates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bedrick, E. J. (1990). On the large sample distributions of modified sample biserial correlation coefficients.Psychometrika, 55, 217–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brogden, H. E. (1949). A new coefficient: Application to biserial correlation and to estimation of selective efficiency.Psychometrika, 14, 169–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. L., & Kotz, S. (1970).Distributions in statistics: Continuous multivariate distributions. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, H. C. (1981). Modified biserial correlation coefficients.Psychometrika, 46, 275–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. (1963). Biserial estimates of correlation.Psychometrika, 28, 81–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. G., Jr. (1974). The jackknife: A review.Biometrika, 61, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maronna, R. A. (1976). RobustM-estimators of multivariate location and scatter.Annals of Statistics, 4, 51–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K. (1909). On a new method of determining the correlation between a measured characterA and a characterB.Biometrika, 7, 96–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. R. (1973).Linear statistical inference and its applications (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. (1978).Statistical methods (6th ed.). Ames, Iowa: The Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soper, H. E. (1913). On the probable error for the biserial expression for the correlation coefficient.Biometrika, 10, 384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate, R. F. (1955). The theory of correlation between two continuous variables when one is dichotomized.Biometrika, 42, 205–216.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author would like to thank the referees for several suggestions that improved the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bedrick, E.J. A comparison of generalized and modified sample biserial correlation estimators. Psychometrika 57, 183–201 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294504

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294504

Key words

Navigation