Skip to main content
Log in

A stochastic multidimensional scaling procedure for the spatial representation of three-mode, three-way pick any/J data

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a new stochastic multidimensional scaling procedure for the analysis of three-mode, three-way pick any/J data. The method provides either a vector or ideal-point model to represent the structure in such data, as well as “floating” model specifications (e.g., different vectors or ideal points for different choice settings), and various reparameterization options that allow the coordinates of ideal points, vectors, or stimuli to be functions of specified background variables. A maximum likelihood procedure is utilized to estimate a joint space of row and column objects, as well as a set of weights depicting the third mode of the data. An algorithm using a conjugate gradient method with automatic restarts is developed to estimate the parameters of the models. A series of Monte Carlo analyses are carried out to investigate the performance of the algorithm under diverse data and model specification conditions, examine the statistical properties of the associated test statistic, and test the robustness of the procedure to departures from the independence assumptions. Finally, a consumer psychology application assessing the impact of situational influences on consumers' choice behavior is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addelman, S. (1962). Orthogonal main-effect plans for asymmetrical factorial experiments.Technometrics, 4, 21–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-19, 716–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. B. (1980).Discrete statistical models with social science applications. New York: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, D. J. (1980). Factor analysis for categorical data.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B,42, 293–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (1974). An exploratory assessment of situational effects in buyer behavior.Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 156–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (1975). Situational variables and consumer behavior.Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 157–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. W., & Witt, P. A. (1970). Sources of behavioral variance during leisure time.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 352–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R. D., & Lieberman, M. (1970). Fitting a response model forn dichotomously scored items.Psychometrika, 35, 179–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozdogan, H. (1987). Model selection and Akaike's information criteria (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions.Psychometrika, 52, 345–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. D., & Chang, J. J. (1970). Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via anN-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition.Psychometrika, 35, 283–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. D., Pruzansky, S., & Kruskal, J. B. (1980). CANDELINC: A general approach to multidimensional analysis of many-way arrays with linear constraints on parameters.Psychometrika, 45, 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoffersson, A. (1975). Factor analysis of dichotomized variables.Psychometrika, 40, 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, C. H. (1964).A theory of data. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R., & Snell, E. J. (1989).Analysis of binary data (2nd ed.). London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw, J. (1973).Canonical analysis of categorical data. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Leiden, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSarbo, W. S. (1978).Three-way unfolding and situational dependence in consumer preference analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Department of Marketing, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSarbo, W. S. (1982). GENNCLUS: New models of general nonhierarchical clustering analysis.Psychometrika, 47, 449–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSarbo, W. S., & Carroll, J. D. (1985). Three-way metric unfolding via weighted alternating least-squares.Psychometrika, 50, 275–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSarbo, W. S., Carroll, J. D., Lehmann, D. R., & O'Shaughnessy, J. (1982). Three-way multivariate conjoint analysis.Marketing Science, 1, 323–350.Marketing Science, 1, 323-350.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSarbo, W. S., & Cho, J. (1989). A stochastic multidimensional scaling vector model for the spatial representation of pick any/N data.Psychometrika, 54, 105–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSarbo, W. S., & Hoffman, D. L. (1986). A new unfolding threshold model for the spatial representation of binary choice data.Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 247–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSarbo, W. S., & Hoffman, D. L. (1987). Constructing MDS joint spaces from binary choice data: A new multidimensional unfolding threshold model for marketing research.Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 40–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSarbo, W. S., Lehman, D., Gupta, S., Holbrook, M., & Havlena, W. (1987). A three-way unfolding methodology for asymmetric binary proximity data.Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 397–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSarbo, W. S., & Rao, V. R. (1984). GENFOLD2: A set of models and algorithms for the GENeral unFOLDing analysis of preference/dominance data.Journal of Classification, 1, 147–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSarbo, W. S., & Rao, V. R. (1986). A constrained unfolding methodology for product positioning.Marketing Science, 5, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Soete, G., DeSarbo, W. S., & Carroll, J. D. (1985). Optimal variable weighting for hierarchical clustering: An alternating least-squares algorithm.Journal of Classification, 2, 173–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Soete, G., DeSarbo, W. S., Furnas, G. W., & Carroll, J. D. (1984). The estimation of ultrametric and path length trees from rectangular proximity data.Psychometrika, 49, 289–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, P. R. (1982). Person-situation segmentation: Segmentation's missing link.Journal of Marketing, 46, 56–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Kollat, D. T. (1969).Consumer behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifi, A. (1990).Nonlinear multivariate analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, P. E., Murray, W., & Wright, M. H. (1981).Practical optimization. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. E., & Rao, V. R. (1972).Applied multidimensional scaling. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenacre, M. J. (1984).Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiser, W. J. (1981).Unfolding analysis of proximity data. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Leiden, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelblau, D. M. (1972).Applied nonlinear programming. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornik, J. (1982). Situational effects on the consumption of time.Journal of Marketing, 46, 44–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B., & Shepard, R. N. (1974). A nonmetric variety of linear factor analysis.Psychometrika, 39, 123–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebart, L., Morineau, A., & Warwick, K. M. (1984).Multivariate descriptive statistical analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, D. R. (1985).Market research and analysis (2nd ed.). Homewood, IL: R. D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J. H. (1979). Joint-space analysis of “pick any” data: Analysis of choices from an unconstrained set of alternatives.Psychometrika, 44, 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. (1980).Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (1976). Quantal choice analysis: A survey.Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 363–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. E., & Ginter, J. L. (1979). An investigation of situational variation in brand choice behavior and attitude.Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 111–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. (1978). Contributions to factor analysis of dichotomous variables.Psychometrika, 43, 551–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelder, J. A., & Wedderburn, R. W. M. (1972). Generalized linear models.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 135, 370–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishisato, S. (1980).Analysis of categorical data: Dual scaling and its applications. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, M. J. D. (1977). Restart procedures for the conjugate gradient method.Mathematical Programming, 12, 241–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandell, R. G. (1968). Effects of attitudinal and situational factors on reported choice behavior.Journal of Marketing Research, 4, 405–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H., & Sokal, R. R. (1973).Numerical taxonomy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takane, Y. (1983, July).Choice model analysis of the “pick any/n” type of binary data. Handout for presentation at the European Meetings of the Psychometric and Classification Societies. Jouy-èn-Josas, France.

  • Wilk, M. B., & Gnanadesikan, R. (1968). Probability plotting methods for the analysis of data.Biometrika, 55, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors acknowledge the helpful comments on previous versions of this manuscript made by the editor, associate editor, and anonymous reviewers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jedidi, K., DeSarbo, W.S. A stochastic multidimensional scaling procedure for the spatial representation of three-mode, three-way pick any/J data. Psychometrika 56, 471–494 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294486

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294486

Key words

Navigation