Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing behavioral health outcomes in outpatient programs: Reliability and validity of the BASIS-32

The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-32) was developed to assess mental health outcomes among patients with severe illness treated on inpatient programs. However, its applicability and utility to those treated in outpatient programs has not been determined. The objective of this study was to assess reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the BASIS-32 among mental health consumers treated in outpatient programs. A total of 407 outpatients completed the BASIS-32 and the Short Form Health Status Profile (SF-36) at the beginning of a treatment episode and again 30 to 90 days later. Outpatients reported less difficulty at intake than did inpatients, and the BASIS-32 detected statistically significant changes 30 to 90 days after beginning outpatient treatment. Factor structure and construct validity were partially confirmed on this sample of outpatient consumers. Analyses of data from a wide range of facilities and samples would add to validation efforts and to further refinement of the BASIS-32.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chamberlin J:On Our Own: Patient Controlled Alternatives to the Mental Health System. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shortell SM, O'Brien JL, Carman JM, et al.: Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement/total quality management: Concept versus implementation.Health Services Research 1995; 30:378–398.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Feldman JL, Fitzpatrick R (Eds.):Managed Mental Health Care: Administrative and Clinical Issues. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eisen SV: Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-32). In: Sederer LI, Dickey B (Eds.):Outcomes Assessment in Clinical Practice. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1996, pp. 65–69.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eisen SV, Dill DL, Grob MC: Reliability and validity of a brief patient-report instrument for psychiatric outcome evaluation.Hospital & Community Psychiatry 1994; 45:242–247.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eisen SV, Dickey B: Mental health outcome assessment: The new agenda.Psychotherapy 1996; 33:181–189.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hoffmann FL, Capelli K, Mastrianni X: Measuring treatment outcome for adults and adolescents: Reliability and validity of BASIS-32.Journal of Mental Health Administration 1997; 24:316–331.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Russo J, Roy-Byrne P, Jaffe C, et al.: The relationship of patient-administered outcome assessments to quality of life and physician ratings: Validity of the BASIS-32.Journal of Mental Health Administration 1997; 24:200–214.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dickerson FB: Assessing clinical outcomes: The community functioning of persons with serious mental illness.Psychiatric Services 1997; 48:897–902.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eisen SV, Leff HS, Schaefer E: Implementing outcome systems: Lessons from a test of the BASIS-32 and the SF-36.Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 1999; 26: 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection.Medical Care 1992; 30:473–483.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Howard KL, Kopta SM, Krause MS, et al.: The dose-effect relationship in psychotherapy.American Psychologist 1986; 41:159–164.

    Google Scholar 

  13. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Lu R, et al.: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups.Medical Care 1994; 32:40–66.

    Google Scholar 

  14. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs.Medical Care 1993; 31:247–263.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ware JE:SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Eisen SV, Wilcox M, Schaefer E, et al.:Use of BASIS-32 for Outcome Assessment of Recipients of Outpatient Mental Health Services. Technical report prepared for the Evaluation Center at the Human Services Research Institute, March 1997.

  17. Jöreskog K, Sörbom D:LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Chicago: Scientific Software, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Long JS:Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jöreskog K, Sörbom D:Advances in Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Models. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hayduk L:LISREL Issues, Debates and Strategies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Browne MS, Cudeck R: Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS (Eds.):Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993, pp. 136–162.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cronbach LJ: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika 1951; 16:297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Helmstadter GC:Principles of Psychological Measurement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stewart AL, Ware JE:Measuring Functioning and Well-Being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cohen J:Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Second ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Eisen SV: Assessment of subjective distress by patients' self-report versus structured interview.Psychological Reports 1995; 76:35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hambleton RK, Swaminathan H, Rogers HJ:Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dickey B, Wagenaar, H: Evaluating mental health care reform: Including the clinician, client and family perspective.Journal of Mental Health Administration 1994; 21:313–319.

    Google Scholar 

  29. PERMS 2.0 Performance Measures for Managed Behavioral Healthcare Programs. Washington, DC: American Managed Behavioral Healthcare Association, 1998.

  30. Oryx Outcomes: The Next Evolution in Accreditation. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, 1997.

  31. Mental Health Component of a Health Plan Report Card. MHSIP Task Force on Design of the Mental Health Component of a Health Plan Report Card under National Health Care Reform. Washington, DC: Center for Mental Health Services, 1996.

  32. Sederer LI, Dickey B:Outcomes Assessment in Clinical Practice. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan V. Eisen Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eisen, S.V., Wilcox, M., Leff, H.S. et al. Assessing behavioral health outcomes in outpatient programs: Reliability and validity of the BASIS-32. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 26, 5–17 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287790

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287790

Keywords

Navigation