Abstract
The standard peritoneal equilibration test (PET) characterizes the peritoneal transport of fluid, creatinine and urea. However, the applicability of the standard PET may be limited in patients on cycling peritoneal dialysis due to the choice of 2- and 4-h sampling times which exceed the usual dwell time of most patients on cycling peritoneal dialysis. We have performed a modified PET on seven pediatric dialysis patients in an effort to optimize dwell time to achieve maximal clearance of solutes and fluid. When compared with the standard PET, values obtained for dialysate/plasma urea and dialysate/plasma creatinine with the modified PET are significantly different. This resulted in an increased estimated creatinine clearance in five of seven and increased estimated urea clearance in six of seven patients. The modified PET is a more appropriate method for evaluation of peritoneal clearances in children as well as older patients who may require cycling peritoneal dialysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Twardowski ZJ, Nolph KD, Khanna R, Prowant BF, Ryan LP, Moore HL, Nielsen MP (1987) Peritoneal equilibration test. Perit Dial Bull 7: 138–147
Geary DF, Harvey EA, Macmillan JH, Goodman Y, Scott M, Balfe JW (1992) The peritoneal equilibration test in children. Kidney Int 42: 102–105
Hanna JD, Foreman JW, Gehr TWB, Chan JCM, Wolfrurn J, Ruddley J (1993) The peritoneal equilibration test in children. Pediatr Nephrol 7: 731–734
Mendley SR, Umans JG, Majkowski NL (1993) Measurement of peritoneal dialysis delivery in children. Pediatr Nephrol 7: 284–289
Friis-Hansen B (1961) Body water compartments in children: changes during growth and related changes in body composition. Pediatrics 28: 169–181
Brandes JC, Piering WF, Beres JA, Blumenthal SS, Fritsche C (1992) Clinical outcome of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis predicted by urea and creatinine kinetics. J Am Soc Nephrol 2: 1430–1435
Keshaviah PR, Nolph KD, Prowant B, Moore H, Ponferrada L, Van Stone J, Twardowski ZJ, Khanna R (1990) Defining the adequacy of CAPD with urea kinetics. Adv Perit Dial 6: 173–177
Gotch FA (1993) Adequacy of peritoneal dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 21: 96–98
Teehan BP, Schleifer CR, Brown JM, Sigler MH, Raimondo J (1990) Urea kinetic analysis and clinical outcome on CAPD. A five year longitudinal study. Adv Perit Dial 6: 181–185
Smith CH, Landt M, Steelman M, Ladenson JH (1983) The Kodak Ektachem 400 Analyzer evaluated for automated enzymic determination of plasma creatinine. Clin Chem 29: 1422–1425
Gerard S, Khayam-Bashi H (1984) Negative interference with the Ektachem (Kodak) enzymic assay for creatinine by high serum glucose. Clin Chem 30: 1884
Arouche W, Delawari E, Laville M, Abdullah E, Traeger J (1993) Quantification of adequacy of peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 13: 5215–5218
Nolph KD, Moore HL, Prowant B, Meyer M, Twardowski ZJ, Khanna R, Ponferrada L, Keshaviah P (1993) Cross sectional assessment of weekly urea and creatinine clearances and indices of nutrition in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int 13: 178–183
Schreiber M, Kawabe M, Cosentino F (1993) KT/V in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and automated peritoneal dialysis (APD). J Am Soc Nephrol 4: 417
Warady B (1994) The peritoneal equilibration test (PET) in pediatrics. Contemp Dial Nephrol 15: 21–23
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fitzwater, D.S., Jones, D.P. Use of a modified peritoneal equilibration test to optimize solute and water clearance. Pediatr Nephrol 9, 341–345 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02254205
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02254205