Skip to main content
Log in

Productivity of Boran cattle and their Friesian crosses at Abernossa Ranch, rift valley of Ethiopia. I. Reproductive performance and pre-weaning mortality

Productivite Du Betail Boran Et des Ses Croisements Avec La Race Frisonne Au Ranch D'abernossa, Dans La Vallee Du Rift (Ethiopie). I. Performance De Reproduction Et Mortalite Avant Sevrage

Productividad De Ganado Boran Y Sus Cruces Con Friesian En El Rancho De Abernossa En El Valle De Rift De Etiopia. I. Desempeno Reproducctivo Y Mortalidad Predestete

  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Data collected on number of services per conception (NSC), age at first calving (AFC), calving interval and calf pre-weaning mortality rate of Boran cattle and their Friesian crosses were evaluated. The NSC was 1·81, 1·61 and 1·69 for Boran, F1 Boran-Friesian and three-quarter Friesian heifers respectively. The AFC varied from 31·5 months in the F1 crosses to 46·8 months in the Boran heifers artificially inseminated with Friesian semen. The mean calving intervals were 465, 552, 525 and 487 days for Boran cows naturally mated to Boran and Friesian bulls, Boran and F1 cows artificially inseminated with Friesian semen respectively. The preweaning calf mortality rate was 3·4% and was significantly influenced by parity, sex and interaction of breed with year of birth. Year as well as season had in general significant effects on the traits considered. However, the variation between mating or breeding groups was also large and it was in favour of the F1 crosses.

Résumé

Les auteurs one estimé les données obtenues sur le nombre de montes avant la conception, l'âge au premier vêlage, l'intervalle entre deux mises bas et le taux de mortalité avant sevrage sur le bétail Boran et les croisements frisons au ranch d'Abernossa (Ethiopie). Le nombre de montes était de 1,81, 1,61 et 1,69 pour les génisses Boran, F1 Boran × frisonne et 3/4 frisonne respectivement. L'âge au premier vêlage a varié de 31,5 mois pour le croisement F1 à 46,8 mois pour les génisses Boran artificiellement inseminées avec du sperme frison.

L'intervalle moyen au vêlage était de 465, 552, 525 et 487 jours pour les femelles Boran fécondées en monte naturelle respectivement par des taureaux Boran et Frison, et des vaches Boran et F1 inséminées artificiellement avec du sperme frison. Le taux de mortalité avant sevrage était de 3,4p.100. Il était influencé de façon significative par le nombre de parturitions antérieures, le sexe et l'interaction raciale avec l'année de naissance. L'année aussi bien que la saison, avaient en règle générale des effets significatifs sur les caractères considérés. Néanmoins la variation entre les groupes de monte et de naissance était également large mais jouait en faveur du croisement F1.

Resumen

Se evaluaron los datos sobre el número de servicios por concepción (NSC), edad a la primera parición (EP), intervalo entre partos y tasa de mortalidad predestete, del ganado Borán y sus cruces con Friesian. El número de servicios por concepción fue 1·81, 1·61 y 1·69 para Borán, F1 Borán/Friesian y tres cuartos novillas Friesian, respectivamente. La EP varió de 31·5 meses en los cruces F1, hasta 46·8 meses en las novillas Borán inseminadas artificialmente con semen Friesian. El intervalo entre partos fue de 465, 552, 525 y 487 días para vacas Borán servidas por monta natural con toros Borán y Friesian, vacas Borán y vacas F1 inseminadas artificialemente con semen de Friesian, respectivamente. La tasa de mortalidad predestete fue de 3·4% y fue significativamente influenciada por el número de partos, sexo e interacción de raza con el año de nacimiento. El año como también le estaciones también tuvieron efecto significativo sobre las variables consideradas. Sin embargo, la variación entre los grupos de empadre fue mayor, siendo en favor de los cruces F1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberro, M. (1983). Comparative performance of F1 Friesian × zebu heifers in Ethiopia.Animal Production,37, 247–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnason, T. &Kassa-Mersha, H. (1987). Genetic parameters of growth of Ethiopian Boran cattle.Animal Production,44, 201–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, T. G., Ingalls, J. E., Zimmerman, D. R. &Wiltbank, J. N. (1969). Reproductive performance of 2-year-old Hereford and Angus heifers as influenced by pre- and post-calving energy intake.Journal of Animal Sciences,29, 719–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, K. E., Trail, J. C. M., Sandford, J. &Durkin, J. (1984). Crossbreeding cattle in beef production programmes in Kenya. I. Comparison of purebred Boran and Boran crossed with the Charolais, Ayrshire and Santa Gertrudis breeds.Tropical Animal Health and Production,16, 181–186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haile-Mariam, M. (1987). Evaluation of reproduction and growth performance of Boran cattle and their crosses with Friesians at Abernossa, Ethiopia. MSc. Thesis, Alemaya University of Agriculture, DireDawa, Ethiopia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, W. R. (1977).User's guide for least-squares and maximum likelihood computer program. Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassa-Mersha, H. &Arnason, T. (1986). Non-genetic factors affecting growth of Ethiopian Boran cattle.World Review Animal Production,22, 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katpatal, B. G., Kaushik, S. N. &Singhal, R. A. (1978). Factors affecting age at first calving in Holstein-Sahiwal crossbreds at varying levels of Holstein breeding.Indian Journal of Animal Sciences,48, 245–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laster, D. B., Glimp, H. A., Cundiff, L. V. &Gregory, K. E. (1973). Factors affecting dystocia and the effects of dystocia on subsequent reproduction in beef cattle.Journal of Animal Science,36, 695–705.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, R. E. &Leining, K. B. (1978). Handling of European cattle in the tropics for reproductive efficiency. Paper presented at II Congresso International Da Raca Chianina, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

  • Osman, A. H. &Russell, W. S. (1974). Comparative performance of different grades of European-zebu crossbred cattle at Ghurashi Dairy Farm, Sudan.Tropical Agriculture, (Trinidad),51, 549–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, T. R. &Willis, M. B. (1970).Intensive beef production. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt, V. (1982). Reproductive performance in a semi-wild cattle herd (Bos indicus).Journal of Agricultural Sciences. (Cambridge),98, 567–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swensson, C., Schaar, J., Brännäng, E. &Meskel, L. B. (1981). Breeding activities of the Ethio-Swedish integrated rural development project. 3. Reproductive performance of zebu and crossbred cattle.World Animal Review,38, 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tegegne, A., Gallal, E.S.E. &Kebede, B. (1981). A study on the reproduction of local and F1 crossbred (European × zebu) cows. I. Number of services per conception, gestation length and days open till conception.Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Science,3, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, W. W. (1974). Effects of season, climate and temperature on reproduction and lactation.Journal of Dairy Science,57, 360–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trail, J. C. M. &Gregory, K. E. (1981). Characterization of the Boran and Sahiwal breeds of cattle for economic characters.Journal of Animal Science,52, 1286–1293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trail, J. C. M., Sacker, G. D. &Fisher, I. L. (1971). Crossbreeding beef cattle in western Uganda. 1. Performance of Ankole, Boran and zebu cows.Animal Production,13, 127–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trail, J. C. M., Gregory, K. E., Durkin, J. &Sandford, J. (1984). Crossbreeding cattle in beef production programmes in Kenya. II. Comparison of purebred Boran and Boran crossed with the Red Poll and Santa Gertrudis breeds.Tropical Animal Health and Production,16, 191–200.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trail, J. C. M., Murray, M., Sones, K., Jibbo, J. M. C., Durkin, J. &Light, D. (1985). Boran cattle maintained by chemoprophylaxis under trypanosomiasis risk.Journal of Agricultural Science, (Cambridge)105, 147–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, P. N., Saeed, A. M., Light, D. &Wilson, R. T. (1988). Reproductive performance of Kenana cows in Sudan.Tropical Agriculture, (Trinidad),65, 73–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, M. B. (1974).Beef cattle production in developing countries. (Proceedings). (Ed. A. J. Smith). Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haile-Mariam, M., Banjaw, K., Gebre-Meskel, T. et al. Productivity of Boran cattle and their Friesian crosses at Abernossa Ranch, rift valley of Ethiopia. I. Reproductive performance and pre-weaning mortality. Trop Anim Health Prod 25, 239–248 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02250878

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02250878

Keywords

Navigation