Skip to main content
Log in

In quest of outcomes: The Larimer project

  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article illustrates Larimer County Mental Health Center's response to the intensifying demand for mental healthcare organizations to develop treatment outcome evaluation systems. It describes the integration of the Target Complaints Assessment (TCA) procedure into the everyday clinical assessment and treatment processes of the organization. The article delineates the development of the procedure's practical application and its usefulness as a feedback mechanism to senior management and line clinicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azar, B. (1994). Outcomes measurement is debated by profession.Monitor, 25, 29.

  • Battle, C.C., Imber, S.D., Hoehn-Saric, R., Stone, A.R., Nash, E.R., & Frank, J.D. (1966). Target complaints as criteria of improvement.American Journal of Psychotherapy, 20, 184–192.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. (1991).The Quality Management Professional's Study Guide. Pasadena, CA: Managed Care Consultants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cagney, T., & Woods, D.R. (1994). Clinician update: Clinical MIS.Behavioral Healthcare Tomorrow, 3, 17–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colorado Division of Mental Health. (1991).Colorado client assessment record (CCAR): User's manual. Colorado Division of Mental Health.

  • Computer Associates. (1993).CA-Clipper: Technical and Reference Guide. Computer Associates.

  • Derogatis, L.R. (1977).SCL-90 administration and scoring procedures manual-1. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrel, A.D., Camplair, P.S., & McCullough, L. (1987). Identification of target complaints by computer interview: Evaluation of the computerized assessment system for psychotherapy evaluation and research.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 691–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geraty, R. (1994). Vision 2001 — Behavioral informatics.Behavioral Healthcare Tomorrow, 3, 64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, M., Brown, J., & Deitz, P. (1992).Managing managed care: A mental health practitioner's survival guide. Washington: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. (1994).Target complaints assessment: Guidelines for administration. Unpublished manual, Larimer County Mental Health Center.

  • Kiesler, D. (1966). Some myths of psychotherapy research and the search for a paradigm.Psychological Bulletin, 65, 110–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, L. (1982).The effects of feedback from a computerized problem behavior interview on treatment plans and problem outcomes for psychiatric patients. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston College.

  • McCullough, L., Farrell, A.D., & Longabaugh, R. (1986). The development of a microcomputer-based mental health information system: A potential tool for bridging the scientist-practitioner gap.American Psychologist, 41, 207–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, J., & Kiesler, D.J. (1982). Individualized measures of psychotherapy outcome. In P.C. Kendall & J.N. Butcher (Eds.),Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp.491–543). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shueman, S.A., Warwick, G.T., & Mayhugh, S.L. (1994). Some questions and answers about managed behavioral health care.Register Report: The Newsletter for Health Service Providers in Psychology, 20, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strupp, H.H., & Hadley, S.M. (1977). A tripartite model of mental health and therapeutic outcomes.American Psychologist, 32, 187–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trabin, T. (1994). From the editor—Toward greater accountability for quality: More science, less art?Behavioral Healthcare Tomorrow, 3, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Green, M. In quest of outcomes: The Larimer project. Community Ment Health J 32, 11–21 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249363

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249363

Keywords

Navigation