Skip to main content
Log in

The use of space in living systems theory: Extensions and applications

  • Papers
  • Published:
Systems practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Space, especially physical or geographical space, is a very important concept in living systems theory (LST). Indeed, along with time, it is included in the very definition of a concrete living system. But while time has its own critical subsystem in LST, space receives relative neglect. There is no space subsystem, but space is discussed in the boundary and supporter subsystems. The problem here is that discussion of the boundary emphasizes the regulation of matter-energy and information flows, while discussion of the supporter emphasizes vertical support rather than lateral spacing. The purpose of this paper is to rectify the relative neglect of spacing by unifying the scattered discussion of space in LST. After discussing space in the boundary and supporter subsystems at six levels (the organism, group, organization, community, society, and supranational), the paper extends and complements the literature of LST by discussing additional relevant literature on space, and by discussing possible applications at the six levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, K. D. (1968).Human Ecology: A General Systems Approach, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, K. D. (1981). Abstracted Versus concrete sociological theory.Behav. Sci. 26, 313–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, K. D. (1990).Social Entropy Theory, State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, K. D. (1994).Sociology and the New Systems Theory: Toward A Theoretical Synthesis, State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B. J. L. (1964). Cities as systems within systems of cities.Papers Proc. Region. Sci. Assoc. 13, 147–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, E. W. (1925). The growth of the city: An introduction to a research project. In Park, R. E., Burgess, E. W., and McKenzie, R. D. (eds.),The City, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, J. B. (1962). Population density and social pathology.Sci. Am. 206, 139–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christaller, W. (1963).Die Zentrale Orte in Süddeutschland, Gustaven Fisher, Verlag, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firey, W. (1947).Land Use in Central Boston, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1973).World Dynamics, 2nd ed., Wright-Allen, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, J. (1971). The crowd: Maybe not so maddening after all.Psychol. Today 5, 58–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galle, O. R., Gove, W. R., and Mcpherson, J. M. (1972). Population density and pathology: What are the relations for man?Science 176, 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffit, W., and Veitch, R. (1971). Hot and crowded: Influences of population density and temperature on interpersonal affective behavior.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 17, 92–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, J., and Henley, R. (1987). Sex differences in reaction to spatial invasion.Percept. Motor Skills 64, 809–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, J. A. C. (1978).Space Use by Medical-Surgical Hospital Ward Staff, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzel, A. F. (1970). Body-buffer zone in violent prisoners.Am. J. Psychiat. 127, 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, D. F., and Sommer, R. (1967). Seating arrangements and status.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 7, 90–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, S. M., and Scott, M. B. (1967) Territoriality: A neglected sociological dimension.Soc. Problems 15, 236–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, S. K. (1964). Some demographic and economic correlates of primate cities.Demography 1, 136–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S., Liberty, H. J., Toledo, R., and Wackenhut, J. (1986). Response to intrusion into waiting lines.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 51, 683–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G. (1978).Living Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. L. (1990). The timer.Behavioral Science 35, 164–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G., and Miller, J. L. (1990). Introduction: The nature of living systems.Behav. Sci. 35, 157–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G., and Miller, J. L. (1992). Greater than the sum of its parts. I. Subsystems which process both matter-energy and information.Behav. Sci. 37, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G., and Miller, J. L. (1993). Greater than the sum of its parts. II. Matter-energy processing subsystems.Behav. Sci. 38, 151–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, R. E. (1936). Human ecology.Am. J. Sociol. 42, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1979). Concrete systems and “abstracted” systems.Contemp. Sociol. 8, 696–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (1974).The Modern World System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World in the Sixteenth Century, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bailey, K.D. The use of space in living systems theory: Extensions and applications. Systems Practice 8, 85–106 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249178

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249178

Key words

Navigation