Skip to main content
Log in

Nest relocations in the Japanese queenless antPristomyrmex pungens Mayr. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Nestplatzwechsel bei der königinnenlosen japanischen Ameise Pristomyrmex pungens Mayr. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Nest relocation behavior in the Japanese queenless ant,Pristomyrmex pungens (Myrmicinae), was investigated in two study fields (site A and site Y) in Nagoya City. This species did not construct elaborate subterranean nests but frequently relocated its nests instead. Mean nest longevities were 17.4 days in site A and 15.7 days in site Y, shorter than those of other ants living in similar climatic regions. There was no apparent seasonal change in the frequency of nest relocation throughout the ant's active season, but nest site preference changed seasonally. Nest relocations did not follow a cyclical pattern. Despite the frequent nest relocations, nests were always distributed uniformly. Mean nest relocation distances were 6.8 m in site A and 3.9 m in site Y. Two consecutive nest relocations tended to be in opposite directions. The direction of nest movement was not affected by the distance to a neighbouring nest. Nest movements were usually confined within a small area. Time spent by a colony to relocate its nest was estimated as 20 hr. The proportion of polydomous colonies was 13.7e% in site A and 2.3% in site Y (facultative polydomy). Number of nests per colony tended to increase in summer. Artificial removal of weeds on which workers were collecting aphids' elicited nest relocation. Adaptive and ecological significances of the nest relocation of this ant were discussed.

Zusammenfassung

Das Nestplatzwechselverhalten der königinnenlosen japanischen AmeisePristomyrmex pungens (Myrmicinae) wurde an zwei Stellen (A und Y) im Stadtgebiet von Nagoya untersucht. Diese Art legt keine wohlausgebauten unterirdischen Nester an, sondern wechselt statt dessen häufig ihren Nistplatz.

Die mittlers Aufenhaltsdauer an einem Nestplatz, betrug 17,4 Tage an Stelle A und 17.7 Tage an Stelle Y. Dies ist kürzer als bei anderen Ameisen, die in klimatisch ähnlichen Gebieten leben. Es gab keine erkennbaren jahreszeitlichen Anderungen in der Häufigkeit des Umziehens während der Aktivitätsphase der Ameisen, jedoch schwankeb die Nestplatzpräferenzen saisonal. Der Nestwechsel folgt keinem zyklischen Rhythmus.

Trotz der häufigen Nestwechsel waren die Nester stets gleichmäßig verteilt. Die mittlers Umzugsdistanzen betrugen an Platz A 6,8 m und an Platz Y 3,9 m. Zwei aufei nanderfolgende Umzüge tendierten dazu, in entgegengesetzte Richtungen zu führen. Die Umzugsrichtung wurde nicht durch die Distanz zu einem Nachbarnest beeinflußt. Umzüge fanden in der Regel kleinräumig statt.

Die Zeit, die eine Kolonie für den Umzug benötigte, wurde auf 20 Stunden geschätzt. Der Anteil an polydomen Kolonien betrug an Stelle A 13,7 und an Stelle Y 2,3% (fakultative Polydomie). Der Anteil der Zweignester pro Kolonie zeigt im Sommer eine zunehmende Tendenz. Künstliche Entfernung von Pflanzen, auf denen die Ameisen Honigtau von Blattläusen sammleten, löste Nestwechsel aus. Es wird diskutiert, welche adaptive und ökologische Bedeutung der Nestwechsel bei dieser Ameise besitzt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Batschelet E, 1981.—Circular Statistics in Biology. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley G.A., 1972.—TransplantingFormica obscuripes andDolichoderus taschenbergi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) colonies in jack pine stands of Southeastern Manitoba.Canadian Entomol., 104, 245–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley G.A., 1973.—Interference between nest population ofFormica obscuripes andDolichoderus taschenbergi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Canadian Entomol., 105, 1525–1528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian M.V., 1952.—The structure of a dense natural ant population.J. Anim. Ecol., 21, 12–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian M.V., 1956.—Segregation of species of the ant genusMyrmica.J. Anim. Ecol., 25, 319–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian M.V., Hibble J. Kelly A.F., 1966.—The dispersion of ant species in a southern English heath.J. Anim. Ecol., 35, 281–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson D.M., Gently J.B., 1973.—Effect of shading on the migratory behavior of the Florida harvester ant,Pogonomyrmex badius.Ecology, 54, 452–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark P.J., Evans F.C., 1954.—Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations.Ecology, 35, 445–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vita J., 1979.—Mechanisms of interference and foraging, among colonies of the harvester antPogonomyrmex californicus in the Mojave Desert.Ecology, 60, 729–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Droual R., 1983.—The organization of nest evacuation inPheidole desertorum Wheeler andP. hyatti Emery (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 12, 203–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droual R., 1984.—Anti predator behavior in the antPheidole desertorum: the importance of multiples nests.Anim. Behav., 32, 1054–1058.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskins C.P., Whelden R.M., 1965.—‘Queenlessness’, worker sibship and colonyvs population structure in the Formicoid genusRhytidoponera.Psyche, 72, 87–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbers J.M., 1985.—Seasonal structuring of a north temperature ant community.Insectes Soc., 32, 224–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbers J.M., 1986.—Nest site limitation and facultative polygyny in the antLeptothorax longispinosus.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 19, 115–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B., 1976.—Recruitment behavior, home range orientation and territory in harvester ants,Pogonomyrmex., Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 1, 3–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B., Wilson E.O., 1977.—The number of queens: an important trait in ant evolution.Naturwissenschaften, 64, 8–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itow T., Kobayashi K., Kubota M., Ogata K., Imai H.T., Crozier R.H., 1984.—The reproductive cycle of the queenless antPristomyrmex pungens.Insectes Soc., 31, 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins R., Pressick H.L., Heatwole H., 1973.—Coexistence patterns in insular ants.Am. Sci., 61, 463–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levings S.C., Traniello J.F.A., 1981.—Territoriality, nest dispersion and community structure in ants.Psyche, 88, 265–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maschwitz U., Hanel H., 1985.—The migrating herdsmanDolichoderus (Diabolus) cuspidatus: an ant with a novel mode of life.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 17, 171–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maschwitz U., Schönegge P., 1983.—Forage communication, nest moving, and prey specialization in the oriental ponerineLeptogenys chinensis.Oecologia, 57, 175–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizutani A., 1981.—Preliminary report on worker oviposition in antPristomyrmex pungens Mayr.Kontyû, 48, 327–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morisita M., 1939.—On the battles betweenTetramorium caespitum subsp.jacoti Wheeler and other species of ants.Trans Kansai Entomol. Soc., 8, 127–138, (in Japanese and an English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Möglich M., 1978.—Social organization of nest emigration inLeptothorax (Hym. Form.).Insectes Soc., 25, 205–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möglich M., Hölldobler B., 1975.—Communication and orientation during foraging and emigration in the antFormica fusca.J. Comp. Physiol., 101, 275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peeters C.P., Crewe R.M., 1985.—Worker reproduction in the ponerine antOphthalmopone berthoudi—an alternative form of eusocial organization.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 18, 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryti R.T., Case T.J., 1986.—Overdispersion of ant colonies: a test of hypotheses.Oecologia, 69, 446–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneirla T.C., 1971.—Army Ants: A Study in Social Organization. W.H. Freeman & Co, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood J., 1982.—Nest relocation in ants.Insectes Soc., 29, 138–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood J., Culver D.C., 1979.—Colony movements of some North American ants.J. Anim. Ecol., 48, 373–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot M., 1946.—Daily fluctuations in aboverground activity of three species of ants.Ecology, 27, 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor R.W., 1965.—The Australian ants of genusPristomyrmex, with an apparent case of character displacement.Psyche, 72, 35–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teranishi C., 1929.—The habits and distribution of Japanese Ants (II).Zool. Mag., 41, 312–332 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Traniello J.F.A., Levings S.C., 1986.—Intra- and intercology patterns of dispersion in the antLasius neoniger: correlations with territoriality and foraging ecology.Oecologia, 69, 413–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuji K., Itô Y., 1986.—Territoriality in a queenless ant,Pristomyrmex pungens (Hymenoptera: Myrmicinae).Appl. Ent. Zool., 21, 377–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waloff N., Blackith R.E., 1962.—The growth and distribution of the mounds ofLasius flavus (Fabricius) (Hym.: Formicidae) in Silwood Park, Berkshire.J. Anim. Ecol., 31, 421–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler W.M., 1910.—Ants: Their Structure, Development and Behavior. Columbia University Press, New-York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson E.O., 1971.—The Insect Societies. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasuno M., 1965.—Territory of ants in the Kayano Grassland at Mt. Hakkôda.Scient. Rep. Tôhoku Univ., Ser. IV, 31, 195–206.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsuji, K. Nest relocations in the Japanese queenless antPristomyrmex pungens Mayr. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ins. Soc 35, 321–340 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02225809

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02225809

Keywords

Navigation