Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of restricted watering and its combination with root pruning on root growth capacity, water status and food reserves ofPinus caribaea var.hondurensis seedlings

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Six-month oldPinus caribaea var.hondurensis seedling were subjected to various regimes of restricted watering and their combinations with root pruning to determine a suitable technique of producing seedlings with optimum physiological condition for successful bare-root planting.

From the range of treatments tested, plants subjected to watering once every 9 days (D9) were found to be the ‘hardest’ in terms of highest root growth capacity, leaf water content, root starch content and in having a moderately low transpiration rate.P. caribaea seedlings subjected to this preconditioning treatment may be more able to survive bare-root planting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aldhous J R 1972 Nursery practice. Brit. For. Comm. Bull. No. 43, 184 p.

  2. Allen S E, Grimshaw H M, Parkinson J A and Quarmby C 1974 Chemical Analysis of Ecological Material. Blackwell Scientific Publ., Oxford, London.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anonymous 1957 Tree planting practices in Tropical Asia. F.A.O. Forestry Development Paper No. 11, 171 p. Rome.

  4. Anonymous 1975 Plantation management procedures for large-scale plantations in Peninsular Malaysia. FO: DP/MAL/72/009. Working paper No. 36, 205 p.

  5. Awang K B 1973 The development of nursery practices for plantation forests, with particular reference to tropical and subtropical conditions. Hons. thesis submitted to Aust. Nat. Univ., 143 p. Unpublished.

  6. Bacon G J and Bacheland E P 1978 The influence of nursery conditioning treatments on some physiological responses of recently transplanted seedlings ofPinus caribaea Mor. var.hondurensis Barr and Golf. Aust. For. Res. 8, 173–83.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bacon G J and Hawkins P J 1977 Studies on the establishment of open root Caribbean pine planting stock in Southern Queensland. Aust. For. 40, 173–91.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bacon G J and Hawkins P J 1980 Establishment trials withPinus caribaea var.hondurensis in South-East Queensland. Mal. For. 43, 24–36.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Briscoe C B 1962 Early lifting of pine seedlings. Inst. Trop. For., Puerto Rico. Note 10.

  10. Chavasse C G R and Weston G C (Ed.) 1969 Forestry nursery and establishment practice in New Zealand. N.Z. For. Serv., F.R.I. Symp. No. 9.

  11. Darby S P 1962 Intensified nursery practices — the key to high quality, custom-grown field graded forest tree seedlings. Tree Plant Notes 52, 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lamb A F A 1973 ‘Pinus caribaea’. Vol. 1. Fast growing timber trees of the lowland tropics. Comm. For. Inst. Oxford. No. 6.

  13. Paul D K 1972 A handbook of nursery practice forPinus caribaea var.hondurensis and other conifers in West Malaysia. FAO UNDPFO: SF/MAL 12. Working paper No. 19, 139 p.

  14. Rook D A 1969 Water relations of wrenched and unwrenchedPinus raidata seedlings on being transplanted into conditions of water stress. N.Z.J. For. 14, 50–58.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rook D A 1971 Effect of undercutting and wrenching on growth ofPinus radiata D. Don. Seedlings. J. Appl. Ecol. 8, 477–90.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rook D A 1972 Conditioning of radiata pine seedlings to transplanting, by restricted water. N. Z. J. For. Sci. 3, 54–69.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Steel R G D and Torrie J H 1960 Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stone E C 1955 Poor survival and the physiological condition of planting stock. For. Sci. 1, 90–94.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stone E C 1967 The root regenerating capacity of seedling transplants and the availability of soil moisture. Ann. Arid Zone 6, 42–57.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stone E C and Benseler R W 1962 Planting ponderosa pine in the California pine region. J. For. 60, 462–66.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stone E C and Jenkinson J L 1970 Influence of soil water on root growth capacity of ponderosa pine transplants. For. Sci. 16, 230–39.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stone E C and Schubert G H 1959 The physiological condition of ponderosa pine (P. ponderosa Laws.) planting stock as it affects survival after cold storage. J. For. 7, 837–41.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stupendick J T and Shepherd K R 1980 Root regeneration of rootprunedPinus radiata seedlings. II. Effects of root pruning on photosynthesis and translocation. N.Z.J. For. Sci. 10, 148–58.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sutton R F 1980 Planting stock quality, root growth capacity and field performance of three boreal conifers. N.Z.J. For. Sci. 10, 54–71.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Driessche R van den 1978 Seasonal changes in root growth capacity and carbohydrates in red pine and white spruce nursery seedlings. Proc. IUFRO Symp. on root physiology and symbiosis, Nancy, France, 11–15 Sept., 1978.

  26. Weatherley P E 1950 Studies in the water relations of the cotton plant. I. The field management of water deficits in leaves. New Phytol. 49, 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abod, S.A., Sandi, S. Effect of restricted watering and its combination with root pruning on root growth capacity, water status and food reserves ofPinus caribaea var.hondurensis seedlings. Plant Soil 71, 123–129 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02182647

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02182647

Key words

Navigation