Skip to main content
Log in

Preschool enrichment and learning

  • Early Learning
  • General Issues in Early Learning
  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses some of the basic cognitive units and processes involved in intellective functioning. It suggests that the basic units, consist of schemata, images, symbols, concepts, and rules and that motor action does not have to be an accompaniment to the acquisition of some of these cognitive structures. Comprehension, memory, generation of solution hypotheses, evaluation, and implementation are offered as the basic cognitive processes and some suggestions are made that may be helpful to the teacher. It is argued that the concept of intelligence has no explanatory meaning and that the components that are selected to characterize the intelligent child will change over culture and history. It is urged that communities and educators adopt a relativistic attitude toward the familial or educational experiences that promote optimal growth, for it is not possible to specify the correct set of experiences unless one simultaneously notes the cultural demands the child will encounter.

Résumé

L'auteur traite de certains procédés cognitifs de base qui font partie de la fonction intellectuelle. Il suggère que les structures de base consistent en schémas, images, symboles, concepts, et règles et que l'action motrice n'est pas nécessaire à l'acquisition de certains de ces structures cognitives. L'auteur considère la compréhension, la mémoire, les hypothèses de solution, l'évaluation, et l'exécution comme les procédés cognitifs de base; il offre quelques suggestions qui peuvent aider l'instituteur. L'auteur affirme que le concept de l'intelligence n'a pas de sens explicatif et que les traits qu'on choisit pour caractériser l'enfant intelligent changeront selon la culture et l'histoire. L'auteur propose que les communautés et les éducateurs adoptent une attitude relativiste envers les expériences familiales ou éducatives qui promeuvent le développement optimal, car il est impossible de préciser les expériences correctes à moins qu'on ne note en même temps les exigences culturelles que l'enfant rencontrera.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Briggs, C. H. An experimental study of reflection-impulsivity in children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1966.

  • Debus, R. L. Effects of brief observation of model behavior on conceptual tempo of impulsive children. Unpublished manuscript, University of Sydney, Australia, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Gourmont, R. Dust for sparrows. In E. Pound,The translations of Ezra Pound. New York: New Directions, 1953. Pp. 363–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J., Pearson, L. & Welch, L. Modifiability of an impulsive tempo.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1966,57, 359–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. F. The effects of training in attention deployment on observing behavior in reflective and impulsive children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1968.

  • Yando, R. M., & Kagan, J. The effect of teacher tempo on the child.Child Development, 1968,39, 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Preparation of this paper was supported by grants from NICHD (HD04299), U.S. Public Health Service, and from the Carnegie Corporation of New York.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kagan, J. Preschool enrichment and learning. Interchange 2, 12–22 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02137788

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02137788

Keywords

Navigation