Skip to main content
Log in

A research agenda for group care

  • Articles
  • Published:
Child and Youth Care Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a research agenda for group care. The agenda is organized around six themes—demographic data, program typology, differential placement criteria, group care as a venue for child rearing, testing new service programs, and the education and training of group care practitioners. Each theme is accompanied by a comment about the methodological issues that will be encountered as this agenda is pursued.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, P. (1994). Marketing social change: The case of family preservation.Children and Youth Services Review, 16, 5/6, 417–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980, Public Law No. 96-272.

  • Ainsworth, F. (1985). Residential programmes for children and youth: an exercise in reframing.British Journal of Social Work, 15(1), 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, F. (1991). The development of a residential program for adolescents.The Child and Youth Care Administrator, 2(1), 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, F. (1993).Children who left care during the decade 1980–1990. Canberra: Australian Research Council, grant application.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, F., & Fulcher, L.C. (1981).Group care for children: Concept and issues. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, F., & Fulcher, L.C. (1994).Child Welfare Abandoned? Paper presented at the FICE 40th International Conference, International Child and Youth Care Conference, Milwaukee, WI (June).

  • Ainsworth, F., & Small, R.W. (in press). Family-centered group care practice: Concept and implementation.Journal of Child and Youth Care Work.

  • Ainsworth, F., Small, R.W., & Hansen, P. (1994).Trieschman Center Carolinas project instrument. Needham, MA: The Albert E. Trieschman Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, B.L., Blacher, J., & Pfeiffer, S.J. (1993). Family involvement in residential treatment of children with psychiatric disorder and mental retardation.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 44(6), 561–566.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, B.L., Heller, L., Blacher, J., & Pfeiffer, S.J. (in press). Residential staff attitudes toward family involvement and family reunification.Hospital and Community Psychiatry.

  • Barth, R.P., & Berry, M. (1987). Outcomes of child welfare services since permanency planning.Social Services Review, 61, 71–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, R.P. (1988).On their own: The experience of youth leaving foster care. Berkeley: School of Social Work, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bath, H.I., & Haapala, D.A. (1993). Intensive family preservation services with abused and neglected children: An examination of group differences.Child Abuse and Neglect, 17(2), 213–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beker, J., & Magnuson, D. (Eds.). (in press). Residential education as an option for atrisk youth [Special issue].Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 13(3).

  • Biehal, N., Clayden, J., Stein, M., & Wade, J. (1994). Leaving care in England: A research perspective.Children and Youth Services Review, 16(3/4), 231–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979).The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contratto, S. (1986). Child abuse and the politics of care.Journal of Education, 168(3), 70–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C.S., Peterson, N.L., & Meier, J.H. (1987). Variables associated with disrupted placement in a selected sample of abused and neglected children.Child Abuse and Neglect, 11(1), 75–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, M.E., & Collins, R.C. (1994). New challenges and opportunities in child welfare outcomes and information technology.Child Welfare, 73(5), 359–378.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, J.F. (1991). Outcome reseqarch on residential treatment: implications and suggested directions.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61(3), 348–357.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, P.A. (1994). Preface. A research agenda for child welfare [Special edition].Child Welfare, 73(5), 355–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanshel, D., & Shinn, E.B. (1978).Children in foster care: a longitudinal investigation. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanshel, D., Finch, S.J., & Grundy, J.F. (1990).Foster children in life course perspective. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, T. (1983).No one ever asked us. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, R.M., & Street, S. (1985). Admission and discharge criteria for children's mental health services: A review of the issues and options.Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 14(3), 229–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goerge, R.M. (1990). The reunification process in substitute care.Social Services Review, 64(3), 422–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goerge, R.M., Van Voorhis, J., Grant, S., Casey, K., & Robinson, M. (1992). Special education experiences of foster children: an empirical study.Child Welfare, 71(5), 419–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goerge, R., Wulczyn, F., & Fanshel, D. (1994). A foster care research agenda for the 90's.Child Welfare, 73(5), 525–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (1995).The home on Gorham Street and the voices of its children. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasso, A.J., & Epstein, I. (1993).Information Systems in Child, Youth and Family Agencies. New York: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, S.L. (1992). The effects of increasing education on individual professional behavior and commitment.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, G.S. (1980). Response-shift bias. A problem in evaluating interventions with pre/post self reports.Evaluation Review, 4(1), 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • ingrassia, M., & McCormick, J. (1994, April 25). Why leave children with bad parents?Newsweek, 52–58.

  • Jones, M. A., & Moses, B. (1984).West Virginia's former foster children, their experience and lives as young adults. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahan, B. (1994).Growing up in groups. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, R. (1994). Orphpans of separation: The painful politics of transracial adoption.American Prospect, 17(1), 38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, J. (1981). Foster children grown up: parameters of care and adult delinquency.Children and Youth Services Review, 3, 99–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maluccio, A.N., Fein, E., & Davies, I.P. (1994). Family reunification: research findings, issues and direction.Child Welfare, 73(5), 489–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauders, D. (1994). Awakening from the dream: The experience of childhood in Protestant orphan homes in Australia, Canada, and the United States.Child and Youth Care Forum, 23(6), 393–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millham, S., Bullock, R., Hosie, K., & Haak, M. (1986).Lost in care. Aldershot, England: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minty, B. (1987).Child care and adult crime. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecora, P., Whittaker, J.K., & Maluccio, A.N. (1992).The child welfare challenge: policy, practice and research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelton, L.H. (1991). For reasons of poverty. New York, NY: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poertner, J., & Rapp, C.A. (1985). Purchase of service and accountability: Will they ever meet?Administration in Social Work, 9(1), 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinton, D., & Rutter, M. (1988).Parenting breakdown. Aldeshot, England: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, A. (1992). The tracing problem: an aspect of outcome studies in child welfare.Children Australia, 17(1), 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmittroth, L. (1994).Statistical record of children. Detroit, MI: Gale Research Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, R.S., Dowling, P.J., Smart J.P., & Huber, V.L. (1991).Human resource management in Australia. Pymble, NSW: Harper Educational

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, I, Ortega, R, Guo S., & Fishman, G. (1994). Infants in nonpermanent placement.Social Services Review, 68(3), 405–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheindlin, J.B. (1994, August 29). Paying grandmother to keep kids in limbo.The New York Times, p. A15.

  • Social Security Act 427(a)(2)(A), 42 U.S.C.A. 627(a)(2)(A) (West Supp. 1981).

  • Stein, M., & Carey, K. (1986).Leaving care. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuck, E. (Personal communication, June 22, 1994).

  • Triseliotis, J., & Russell, J. (1984).Hard to place. London: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accounting Office (1993).Foster care: Services to prevent out-of-home placements are limited by funding patterns. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office, GAO/HRD-93-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Krieken, R. (1991).Children and the state. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, A., & Weiner, E. (1990).Expanding the options in child placement: Israel's dependent children in care from infancy to adulthood. New York: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, K. (1991a). Long term residential treatment of children: introduction.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61(3), 324–326.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, K. (1991b). Placement of emotionally disturbed children in residential treatment: a review of placement criteria.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61(3), 339–347.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, J.K., Overstreet, E.J., Grasso, A., Tripodi, T., & Boyland, F. (1988). Multiple indicators of success in residential youth care and treatment.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 58(1), 143–147.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, J.K., Tripodi, T., & Grasso, A.J. (1993). Youth and family characteristics, treatment histories, and service outcomes: some preliminary findings from the Boysville research program.Child and Youth Services, 16(1), 139–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, J.K., & Pfeiffer, S.I. (1994). Research priorities for residential group child care.Child Welfare, 73(5), 583–601.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wulczyn, F.H. (1992).Status at birth and infant foster care placements in New York City. Albany, NY: New York State Department of Social Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zmora, N. (1994).Orphanages reconsidered: Child care institutions in progressive era Baltimore. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ainsworth, F. A research agenda for group care. Child Youth Care Forum 24, 215–230 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02128589

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02128589

Keywords

Navigation