Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Aspects of sequential organization in plea bargaining discourse

  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alschuler, A. The prosecutor's role in plea bargaining.University of Chicago Law Review, 1968,36, 50–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. & McConville, M.Negotiated justice: Pressures to plead guilty. London: Martin Robertson, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms, A. E., & McLean, J. D.,Defendants in the criminal process. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckle, S. R. T., & Buckle, C. G.,Bargaining for justice: Case disposition and reform in the criminal courts. New York: Praeger, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, J., & Jacob, H.Felony justice. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Company, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeley, M. Perspectives on plea bargaining.Law and Society Review, 1979,13, 199–209. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeley, M. Pleading guilty in lower courts.Law and Society Review, 1979,13, 461–466. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeley, M.The process is the punishment. New York: Russell Sage, 1979. (c)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E.Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. New York: Bobbs Merrill, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E.Relations in public. New York: Harper Colophon Books, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E.,Replies and responses. Working papers and pre-publications Nos. 15, 46–47, University de Urbino, Italia, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosman, B.The prosecutor: An inquiry into the exercise of discretion. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance/declination. In G. Psathas (Ed.),Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. F.Let's make a deal. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. E.Disclosure and argument in “plea bargaining” sessions, Part I: The topicality of “plea bargaining.” Unpublished manuscript, Centre of Criminology, University of Toronto, 1979.

  • Lyons, J.Introduction to theoretical linguistics. London: Cambridge University Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, W. F. From plea negotiation to coercive justice: Notes on the respecification of a concept.Law and Society Review 1979,13 385–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, L.Plea bargaining or trial? The process of case disposition. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, D. W.A conversational system for negotiation: The case of plea bargaining. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Association, Toronto, Ontario, 1981.

  • Maynard, D. W. Person-descriptions in plea bargaining.Semiotica, forthcoming.

  • Miller, H. S., McDonald W. F., & Cramer, J. A.Plea bargaining in the United States. Washington, DC: National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D. J.Conviction: The determination of guilt or innocence without trial. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Company, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, A.Second assessments: A study of some features of agreements/disagreements. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of California, Irvine, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, A. Pursuing a response. In J. Schenkein (Ed.),Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (Vol. II). forthcoming.

  • Rosett, A. & Cressey, D. R.Justice by consent. New York: J. B. Lippincott, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. Unpublished lecture notes, University of California, Irvine, 1967–72.

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking in conversation.Language 1974,4 696–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (Ed.),Studies in social interaction. Glencoe, NY: The Free Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. Preliminaries to preliminaries: “Can I ask you a question?”Sociological Inquiry 1980,50 104–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. & Sacks, H., Opening up closings. In R. Turner (Ed.),Ethnomethodology. London: Penguin, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. L. Institutions of privacy in the determination of police administrative practice.American Journal of Sociology 1963,69 150–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utz, P.Settling the Facts. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. 1978.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin

    Douglas W. Maynard

Authors
  1. Douglas W. Maynard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

A number of persons have made comments helpful to this paper. Gail Jefferson provided an extensive critique of a much earlier draft. Charles Goodwin, Thomas P. Wilson, and Don H. Zimmerman also read different drafts of portions of the paper and gave valuable feedback. To each of these persons, I remain grateful.

This research was partially supported by a grant from the Research Committee of the Graduate School at the University of Wisconsin-Madison (Project #110642).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maynard, D.W. Aspects of sequential organization in plea bargaining discourse. Hum Stud 5, 319–344 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02127683

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02127683

Keywords

Search

Navigation