Conclusion
I have argued that Marcuse's notions of the merger of work and play and of the possibility of nondominating organizational rationality and authority fly in the face of the mainstream Weberian tradition which venerates the labor-leisure dualism and the bureaucratic coordination of labor. I have further argued that this Weberian current is reappropriated by Jürgen Habermas in his own recent work on the epistemological foundations of social science. The counterpoint between Marcuse and Habermas reveals a split within modern critical theory. This split could be characterized as the split between radicalism and incrementalism. Marcuse takes the more radical viewpoint, arguing that if work and leisure are dialectically merged and if that work is organized democratically through workers' control, then social labor will be experienced, in Marx's early sense, as creative praxis—a type of self-externalizing activity which is both productive and recreative. Habermas, in his reformulation of Weberian sociology, endorses an incrementalist position (contra Marcuse's radicalization and deepening of early Marx's theory of praxis) which rejects the possibility of transforming labor into praxis, arguing instead for greater communicative democracy as a way of redirecting (what Habermas contends is categorically immutable) social labor toward more constructive ends such as the economic levelling of the capitalist welfare state.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agger, B.Western Marxism, Chapter 6, “Individualized Marxism: class-radicalism in the 1960s.” Santa Monica, Calif.: Goodyear, 1979.
Agger, B. Marcuse and Habermas on new science.Polity, Winter 1976,IX, 2, 158–181. (a)
Agger, B. On happiness and the damaged life. In J. O'Neill, (Ed.),On critical theory. New York: Seabury, 1976. (b)
Berger, P., Berger, B., & Kellner, H.The homeless mind. New York: Randon House, 1973.
Fromm, E. (Ed.)Socialist humanism. New York: Doubleday, 1965.
Habermas, J.Legitimation crisis, Boston: Beacon, 1975.
Habermas, J.Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon, 1971.
Leiss, W.The limits to satisfaction. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1976.
Marcuse, H.The aesthetic dimension. Boston: Beacon, 1978.
Marcuse, H.Counterrevolution and revolt. Boston: Beacon, 1973.
Marcuse, H.An essay on liberation. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1969.
Marcuse, H.Eros and civilization. New York: Vintage, 1955.
Markovic, M.From affluence to praxis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1974.
O'Neill, J. (Ed.)On critical theory. New York: Seabury, 1976.
Schaff, A.Marxism and the human individual. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.
Schroyer, T.American Journal of Sociology, January 1978,83, 4, 1033–1035.
Sher, G. S.Praxis. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1978.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Agger, B. Work and authority in Marcuse and Habermas. Hum Stud 2, 191–208 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02127225
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02127225