Abstract
For a compact connected orientablen-manifoldM, n ≥ 3, we study the structure ofclassical superspace \(\mathcal{S} \equiv {\mathcal{M} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\mathcal{M} \mathcal{D}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} \mathcal{D}}\),quantum superspace \(\mathcal{S}_0 \equiv {\mathcal{M} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\mathcal{M} {\mathcal{D}_0 }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\mathcal{D}_0 }}\),classical conformal superspace \(\mathcal{C} \equiv {{\left( {{\mathcal{M} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\mathcal{M} \mathcal{P}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} \mathcal{P}}} \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left( {{\mathcal{M} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\mathcal{M} \mathcal{P}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} \mathcal{P}}} \right)} \mathcal{D}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} \mathcal{D}}\), andquantum conformal superspace \(\mathcal{C}_0 \equiv {{\left( {{\mathcal{M} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\mathcal{M} \mathcal{P}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} \mathcal{P}}} \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left( {{\mathcal{M} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\mathcal{M} \mathcal{P}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} \mathcal{P}}} \right)} {\mathcal{D}_0 }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\mathcal{D}_0 }}\). The study of the structure of these spaces is motivated by questions involving reduction of the usual canonical Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity to a non-degenerate Hamiltonian formulation, and to questions involving the quantization of the gravitational field. We show that if the degree of symmetry ofM is zero, thenS,S 0,C, andC 0 areilh orbifolds. The case of most importance for general relativity is dimensionn=3. In this case, assuming that the extended Poincaré conjecture is true, we show that quantum superspaceS 0 and quantum conformal superspaceC 0 are in factilh-manifolds. If, moreover,M is a Haken manifold, then quantum superspace and quantum conformal superspace arecontractible ilh-manifolds. In this case, there are no Gribov ambiguities for the configuration spacesS 0 andC 0. Our results are applicable to questions involving the problem of thereduction of Einstein's vacuum equations and to problems involving quantization of the gravitational field. For the problem of reduction, one searches for a way to reduce the canonical Hamiltonian formulation together with its constraint equations to an unconstrained Hamiltonian system on a reduced phase space. For the problem of quantum gravity, the spaceC 0 will play a natural role in any quantization procedure based on the use of conformal methods and the reduced Hamiltonian formulation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnowitt, R., Deser, S., and Misner, C. (1962). InGravitation: An Introduction to Current Research, L. Witten, ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York).
Balachandran, A. P. (1989). InGeometrical and Algebraic Aspects of Nonlinear Field Theory, S. De Filippo, M. Marinaro, G. Marmo, and G. Vilasi, eds. (Elsevier Science Publishers).
Bröcker, T., and Jänich, K. (1982).Introduction to Differential Topology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Bruhat, Y. (1962). InGravitation: An Introduction to Current Research, L. Witten, ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York)
Choquet-Bruhat, Y., and York, J. (1980). InGeneral Relativity and Gravitation, A. Held, ed. (Plenum Press, New York), vol. I.
Davis, M., and Morgan, J. (1934). InThe Smith Conjecture, J. Morgan and H. Bass, eds. (Academic Press, New York).
Ebin, D. (1970).Proc. Symp. Pure Math., Amer. Math. Soc. 15, 11.
Fischer, A. (1970). InRelativity, M. Carmeli, S. Fickler, and L. Witten, eds. (Plenum Press, New York).
Fischer, A., and Marsden, J. (1977).Canadian J. Math. 1, 193.
Fischer, A., and Marsden, J. (1979). InProc. International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi,” LXVII — Isolated Gravitating Systems in General Relativity, J. Ehlers, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam/New York).
Fischer, A., and Moncrief, V. (1994) InPhysics on Manifolds. (Proc. International Colloquium in Honour of Yvonne Choquet-Bruhat), M. Flato, R. Kerner, and A. Lichnerowicz, eds. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston).
Fischer, A., and Moncrief, V. (1994). InProc. Cornelius Lanczos International Centenary Conference, J. Brown, M. Chu, D. Ellison, and R. Plemmons, eds. (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia).
Fischer, A., and Moncrief, V. (1996).Gen. Rel. Grav. 28, 209.
Fischer, A., and Moncrief, V. (1995). InGlobal Structure and Evolution in General Relativity, S. Cotsakis and G. W. Gibbons (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg).
Fischer, A., and Moncrief, V. (1995). “Reduction of the Einstein equations in (3+1)-dimensions to a Hamiltonian system on the cotangent bundle of Teichmüller space”, to appear.
Fischer, A., and Tromba, A. (1984).Mathematische Annalen 267, 311.
Fischer, A., and Tromba, A. (1984).J. für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 352, 151.
Friedman, J. (1990). InConceptual Problems in Quantum Gravity, A. Ashtekar and J. Stachel, eds. (Birkhäuser, Boston).
Friedman, J., and Witt, D. (1986).Topology 25, 35.
Freedman, M., and Yau, S. T. (1983).Topology 22, 179.
Gribov, V. (1976).Nucl. Phys. B 139, 1.
Hatcher, A. (1976).Topology 15, 343.
Hempel, J. (1976).Annals of Mathematics Studies, Number 86 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J.).
Hsiang, W. (1967).Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 73, 55.
Hsiang, W. (1967).Ann. Math. 85, 351.
Hsiang, W. (1971).Tamkang Journal of Mathematics, Tamkang College of Arts and Sciences, Taipei 73, 1.
Jaco, W. (1980).Lectures on three-manifold topology, (Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, 43, A.M.S., Providence, R.I.).
Kneser, H. (1929).Jber. Deutsch. Math.-Verein 38, 248.
Lichnerowicz, A. (1944).J. Math. Pures Appl. 23, 37.
Mess, G. (1995). “Homotopically trivial symmetries of 3-manifolds are almost always toral”, to appear.
Milnor, J. (1961).Amer. J. Math. 1, 7.
Milnor, J. (1956).Ann. Math. 63, 272.
Milnor, J. (1956).Ann. Math. 63, 430.
Mitter, P., and Viallet, C., (1981).Commun. Math. Phys. 79, 455.
Moncrief, V. (1989).J. Math. Phys. 30, 2907.
Moncrief, V. (1990).J. Math. Phys. 31, 2978.
Omori, H. (1970).Proc. Symp. Pure Math., Amer. Math. Soc. 15, 167.
Orlik, P. (1972).Seifert manifolds (Lecture Notes in Mathematics 291, Springer-Verlag, New York).
Orlik, P., and Raymond, F. (1968). InProc. Conference on Transformation Groups (New Orleans, 1967), P. Mostert, ed. (Springer-Verlag, New York).
Raymond, F. (1968).Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 131, 51.
Satake, I. (1956).Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 42, 359.
Scott, P. (1983).Bull. London Math. Soc. 15, 401.
Singer, I. (1978).Commun. Math. Phys. 60, 7.
Sorkin, R. (1989). InGeometrical and Algebraic Aspects of Nonlinear Field Theory, S. De Filippo, M. Marinaro, G. Marmo, and G. Vilasi, eds. (Elsevier Science Publishers).
Spanier, E. (1966).Algebraic Topology (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York).
Thurston, W. (1978).The geometry and topology of 3-manifolds Lecture notes from Princeton University, Princeton, N.J.
Thurston, W. (1982). InLow-dimensional topology, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 48, edited by R Brown and T L Thickstun (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Thurston, W. (1982).Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 6, 357.
Witt, D. (1986).J. Math. Phys. 27, 573.
Waldhausen, F. (1967).Topology 6, 505.
Waldhausen, F. (1968).Ann. Math. 18, 56.
Wolf, J. A. (1977).Spaces of Constant Curvature (3rd. ed., Publish or Perish Press, Berkeley, California).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fischer, A.E., Moncrief, V. Quantum conformal superspace. Gen Relat Gravit 28, 221–237 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02105425
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02105425