Skip to main content
Log in

A general accessibility and congestion-sensitive multiactivity spatial interaction model

  • Locational Analysis of Facilities and Services
  • Published:
Papers of the Regional Science Association

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Boyce, D. E., and L. J. LeBlanc. “Synthesizing Network Equilibrium and Design Models for Location of Urban Activities,” paper presented at the Tenth International Symposium on Mathematical Programming, Montreal, Canada, 1979.

  2. Coelho, J. D., and H. C. W. L. Williams. “On the Design of Land Use Plans Through Locational Surplus Maximization,”Papers of the Regional Science Association, Vol. 40 (1978), pp. 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dacey, M. P., and A. Norcliffe. “New Entropy Models in the Social Sciences. 1. Elementary Residential Location Models,”Environment and Planning A, Vol. 8 (1976), pp. 299–310.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hansen, W. G. “How Accessibility Shapes Land Use,”Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 25 (1959), pp. 73–76.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jefferson, T. R., and C. H. Scott. “The Analysis of Entropy Models with Equality and Inequality Constraints,”Transportation Research, Vol. 13B (1979), pp. 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leonardi, G. “Some Mathematical Programming Ideas within a Generalized Spatial Interation and Activity Framework”, pp. 28–47, inLondon Papers in Regional Science 10: Developments in Urban and Regional Analysis, edited by M. J. Breheny. London: Pion, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Leonardi, G. “On the Formal Equivalence of Some Simple Facility Location Models.” WP-80-21, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria (1980). (Presented at the Workshop on Location and Distribution Management, held at EIASM, Brussels, 20–21 March, 1980.)

  8. Leonardi, G. “A Unifying Framework for Public Facility Location Problems.” WP-80-79, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leonardi, G. “A Multiactivity Location Model with Accessibility- and Congestion-Sensitive Demand,” WP-80-124, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lowry, I. S., “A Model of Metropolis.” RM-4035-RC, Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  11. MacGill, S. M., and A. G. Wilson, “Equivalences and Similarities Between Some Alternative Urban and Regional Models,”Sistemi Urbani, Vol. 5 (1979), pp. 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Neuburger, H. L. I. “User Benefit in the Evaluation of Transport and Land Use Plans,”Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 5 (1971), pp. 52–72.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stewart, J. Q. “Concerning ‘Social Physics’,”Scientific American, Vol. 178 (1948), pp. 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Walsh, P. K., and R. W. Gibberd. “Development of an Entropy Model for Residential Location with Maximum Zonal Population Constraints,”Environment and Planning A, Vol. 12 (1980), pp. 1253–1268.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leonardi, G. A general accessibility and congestion-sensitive multiactivity spatial interaction model. Papers of the Regional Science Association 47, 1–17 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02100292

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02100292

Keywords

Navigation