Skip to main content
Log in

Differentiating specialists and generalists within college students' social support networks

  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to examine the relationships among social network structure, types of social support, and determinants of support satisfaction, an alternative method was used to score the Social Support Questionnaire (SSQ). Factor analysis procedures suggested that college students' (N=198) social networks consisted of four groups: nuclear family, other family, friends, and others. Satisfaction with support was positively related to the proportion of the network occupied by nuclear family and negatively related to the proportion of friends in the network. Evidence was found for the presence of both support specialists and support generalists in the networks of the college students. These results are discussed from a developmental perspective with attention to the implications for interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Billings, A. G., and Moos, R. H. (1982). Work stress and the stress buffering roles of work and family resources.J. Occupational Behav. 3: 215–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadhead, W. E., Kaplan, B. H., James, S. A., Wagner, E. H., Schoenbach, V. J., Grimson, R., Heyden, S., Tibblin, G., and Gehlbach, S. H. (1983). The epidemiologic evidence for a relationship between social support and health.Am. J. Epidemiol. 117: 521–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, R. A., and Bloom, B. L. (1982). Social support: Its structure and impact on marital disruption.Am. J. Community Psychol. 10, 647–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, G. (1976). The family as a support system. In Caplan, G., and Killilea, M. (eds.),Support Systems and Mutual Help: Multidisciplinary Explorations, Grune & Stratton, San Francisco, pp. 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colletta, N. D. (1981). Social support and the risk of maternal rejection by adolescent mothers.J. Psychol. 109: 191–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner, K. A., Powers, E. A., and Bultena, G. L. (1979). Social interaction and life satisfaction: An empirical assessment of late-life patterns.J. Gerontol. 34: 116–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conter, K. R., Hatch, C. L., and D'Augelli, A. R. (1980). Enhancing the skills of Cub Scout den leaders: Training, generalization, and maintenance.Am. J. Community Psychol. 8: 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMatteo, M. R., and Hayes, R. (1981). Social support and serious illness. In Gottlieb, B. H. (ed.),Social Networks and Social Support, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif. pp. 117–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1950).Childhood and Society, Norton and Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, B. H. (1981). Preventive interventions involving social networks and social support. In Gottlieb, B. H. (ed.),Social Networks and Social Support, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif., pp. 201–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1982). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In Marsden, P. V., and Lin, N. (eds.),Social Structure and Network Analysis, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif., pp. 105–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, B. J. (1980). Natural support systems and coping with major life changes.Am. J. Community Psychol. 8: 159–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriegler, J. A. (1985). Developmental aspects of social support: A multidimensional analysis of children's social networks. Unpublished master's thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Mich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavy, R. L. (1983). Social support and psychological disorder: A review.J. Community Psychol. 11: 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N., Dean, A., and Ensel, W. M. (1981). Social support scales: A methodological note.Schizophrenia Bull. 7: 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, M. F. and Haven, C. (1968). Interaction and adaptation: Intimacy as a critical variable.Am. Sociol. Rev. 33: 20–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P., and Ingham, J. G. (1976). Friends, confidants, and symptoms.Social Psychiatry. 11: 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair, D., and Jason, L. A. (1984). An investigation and analysis of social networks among children. Poster session presented at the Midwestern Psychological Association annual convention, Chicago, Illinois.

  • Pilisuk, M., and Minkler, M. (1980). Supportive networks: Life ties for the elderly.J. Soc. Issues 36: 95–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, I. N. (1980). Social support resources, stress, and maladjustment of poor children.Am. J. Community Psychol. 8: 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, I. G., and Sarason, B. R. (1982). Concomitants of social support: Attitudes, personality characteristics, and life experiences.J. Personal. 50: 331–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, I. G., Levine, H. M., Basham, R. B., and Sarason, B. R. (1983). Assessing social support: The social support questionnaire.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 44: 127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A. (1982). Conceptual, methodological, and theoretical problems in studying social support as a buffer against life stress.J. Health Soc. Behav. 23: 145–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, K. N., MacBride, A., and Vachon, M. L. S. (1977). Social support networks and the crisis of bereavement.Soc. Sci. Med. 11: 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. S. (1976). Transition states and other stressful situations: Their nature and programs for their management. In Caplan, G., and Killilea, M. (eds.),Support Systems and Mutual Help: Multidisciplinary Explorations, Grune & Stratton, San Francisco (pp. 213–232).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesenfeld, A. R., and Weis, H. M. (1979). Hairdressers and helping: Influencing the behavior of informal caregivers.Prof. Psychol. 7: 786–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, B. L. (1981). Social support in adjusting to marital disruption: A network analysis. In Gottlieh, B. H. (ed.),Social Networks and Social Support, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif., pp. 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youniss, J. (1983). Social construction of adolescence by adolescents and parents. In Grotevant, H. D. and Cooper, C. R. (eds.),Adolescent Development in the Family. New Directions in Child Development (Vol. 22), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bogat, G.A., Caldwell, R.A., Rogosch, F.A. et al. Differentiating specialists and generalists within college students' social support networks. J Youth Adolescence 14, 23–35 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02088644

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02088644

Keywords

Navigation