Skip to main content
Log in

Wound infection rates following preoperative versus intraoperative commencement of antibiotic prophylaxis

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of antibiotic prophylaxis initiated one hour prior to contamination or at the time of contamination was evaluated in a randomized blind study using a guinea pig model of surgical wound infection. Wound infection, defined as accumulation of pus draining spontaneously or after opening of the wound, developed in 135 guinea pigs after intraincisional contamination before wound closure with 107 Escherichia coli plus 108 Bacteroides fragilis. Antibiotic prophylaxis with gentamicin plus clindamycin significantly reduced the wound sepsis rate from 82 % in the control group of 61 animals to 19 % in the two treated groups of 68 and 67 animals (p<0.001). However, the timing of antibiotic prophylaxis did not influence wound sepsis rates, rectal temperature during the postoperative period, or bacterial recovery from wound infections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baum, M. L., Anish, D. S., Chalmers, T. C., Sacks, H. S., Smith, H., Jr., Fragerstrom, R. M.: A survey of clinical trials of antibiotic prophylaxis in colon surgery: evidence against further use of non-treatment controls. The New England Journal of Medicine 1981, 305: 795–799.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moellering, R. C., Jr., Kunz, L. J., Poitras, J. W., Cameron, M., Mercier, B. A.: Microbiologic basis for the rational use of prophylactic antibiotics. Southern Medical Journal 1977, 70, Supplement 1: 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hurley, D. L., Howard, P., Jr., Hahn, H. H.: Perioperative prophylactic antibiotics in abdominal surgery. Surgical Clinics of North America 1979, 59: 919–933.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moesgaard, F., Lykkegaard Nielsen, M. C., Justesen, T.: Experimental animal model of surgical wound infection applicable to antibiotic prophylaxis. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1983, 2: 459–462.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ljungqvist, U.: Wound sepsis after clean operations. Lancet 1964, i: 1095–1097.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burke, J. F.: The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions. Surgery 1961, 50: 161–168.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stone, H. H., Hooper, C. A., Kolb, L. D., Geheber, C. E., Dawkins, E. J.: Antibiotic prophylaxis in gastric, biliary, and colonic surgery. Annals of Surgery 1976, 184: 443–450.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lykkegaard Nielsen, M., Justesen, T.: Anaerobic and aerobic bacteriological studies in biliary tract disease. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 1976, 11: 437–446.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leigh, D. A., Pease, R., Henderson, H., Simmons, K., Russ, R.: Prophylactic lincomycin in the prevention of wound infection following appendicectomy: a double blind study. British Journal of Surgery 1976, 63: 973–977.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lykkegaard Nielsen, M., Scheibel, J. H., Wamberg, T.: Septic complications in colo-rectal surgery after 24 hours versus 60 hours of preoperative antibiotic bowel preparation. Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica 1978, 144: 523–526.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gottrup, F., Saksø, P.: Metronidazole and appendicitis. Can a preoperative prophylaxis be changed to a peroperative treatment in high risk patients? Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica 1981, 147: 445–446.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ulrich, C.: Short term systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in colorectal surgery. Thesis, University of Leiden, 1981.

  13. Lewis, R. T.: Discriminate use of antibiotic prophylaxis in gastroduodenal surgery. American Journal of Surgery 1979, 13: 640–643.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nichols, R. L., Webb, W. R., Jones, J. W., Smith, J. W., LoCicero, J.: Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in high risk gastroduodenal operations. American Journal of Surgery 1982, 143: 94–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Strachan, C. J. L., Black, J., Powis, S. J. A., Waterworth, T. A., Wise, R., Wilkinson, A. R., Burdon, D. W., Severn, M., Mitra, B., Norcott, H.: Prophylactic use of cephazolin against wound sepsis after cholecystectomy. British Medical Journal 1977, 1: 1254–1256.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Morran, C., McNaught, W., McArdle, C. S.: Prophylactic co-trimoxazole in biliary surgery. British Medical Journal 1978, 2: 462–464.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hunt, P. S., Francis, J. K., Peck, G., Farrell, K., Sali, A.: Tinidazole in the prevention of wound infection after elective colorectal surgery. Medical Journal of Australia 1979, i: 107–109.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hughes, E. S. R., McDermott, F. T., White, A., Masterton, J. P.: Cephaloridine prophylaxis in resection of the large intestine. New Zealand Journal of Surgery 1981, 49: 434–437.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gottrup, F.: Prophylactic metronidazole in prevention of infection after appendicectomy: report of a doubleblind trial. Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica 1980, 146: 133–136.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pinto, D. J., Sanderson, P. J.: Rational use of antibiotic therapy after appendicectomy. British Medical Journal 1980, 280: 275–277.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moesgaard, F., Nielsen, M.C.L., Justesen, T. et al. Wound infection rates following preoperative versus intraoperative commencement of antibiotic prophylaxis. Eur. J, Clin. Microbiol. 3, 199–202 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02014878

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02014878

Keywords

Navigation