Skip to main content
Log in

Realism, operationalism, and quantum mechanics

  • Part II. Invited Papers Dedicated to Günther Ludwig
  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comprehensive formal system is developed that amalgamates the operational and the realistic approaches to quantum mechanics. In this formalism, for example, a sharp distinction is made between events, operational propositions, and the properties of physical systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Aerts, “Description of many physical entities without the paradoxes encountered in quantum mechanics,”Found. Phys. 12, 1131 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Beltrametti and G. Cassinelli,The Logic of Quantum Mechanics (Volume 15 ofEncyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications), G.-C. Rota, ed. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Birkhoff,Lattice Theory (American Math. Society Colloquium Publication XXV), 3rd ed., 1967.

  4. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, “Can the quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?”Phys. Review 47, 777–780 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Fischer and G. Rüttimann, “The geometry of the state space,” inMathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory, A. Marlow, ed. (Academic Press, New York, 1978), pp. 153–176.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. J. Foulis and C. H. Randall, “Manuals, morphisms, and quantum mechanics,” inMathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory, A. Marlow, ed. (Academic Press, New York, 1978), pp. 105–126.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. J. Foulis and C. H. Randall, “What are quantum logics and what ought they to be?” inCurrent Issues in Quantum Logic, E. Beltrametti and B. van Fraassen, eds. (Plenum Press, New York, 1981), pp. 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. J. Foulis and C. H. Randall, “Empirical logic and tensor products,” inInterpretations and Foundations of Quantum Theory, H. Neumann, ed. (B. I. Wissenschaftsverlag, Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim, 1981), pp. 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. J. Foulis and C. H. Randall, “The empirical logic approach to the physical sciences,” inFoundations of Quantum Mechanics and Ordered Linear Spaces, A. Hartkämper and H. Neumann, eds. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1974), pp. 230–249.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. M. Gleason, “Measures on the closed subspaces of a Hilbert space,”J. Math. Mech. 6, 885–893 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. J. Greechie, “On the structure of orthomodular lattices satisfying the chain condition,”J. Combinatorial Theory 4, 210–218 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. R. Halmos,Lectures on Boolean Algebras (D. van Nostrand, Princeton, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. A. Lodkin, “Every measure on the projectors of aW*-algebra can be extended to a state,”Functional Analysis and its Applications 8, 318–321 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Mielnik, “Geometry of quantum states,”Commun. Math. Phys. 9, 55–80 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Mielnik, “Generalized quantum mechanics,”Commun. Math. Phys. 37, 221–256 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. Mielnik, “Quantum logic: Is it necessarily orthocomplemented?” inQuantum Mechanics, Determinism, Causality, and Particles, M. Flatoet al., eds. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. Piron,Foundations of Quantum Physics (W. A. Benjamin, Inc., Reading, Mass., 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. Piron, “New quantum mechanics,” inOld and New Questions in Physics, Cosmology, Philosophy, and Theoretical Biology: Essays in Honor of Wolfgang Yourgrau (Plenum Press, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. H. Randall and D. J. Foulis, “The operational approach to quantum mechanics,” inThe Logico-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics III:Physical Theory as Logical-Operational Structure, C. Hooker, ed. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1978), pp. 167–201.

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. H. Randall and D. J. Foulis, “Operational statistics and tensor products,” inInterpretations and Foundations of Quantum Theory, H. Neumann, ed. (B. I. Wissenschaftsverlag, Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim, 1981), pp. 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. H. Randall and D. J. Foulis, “A mathematical setting for inductive reasoning,” inFoundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science III, C. Hooker, ed. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1976), pp. 169–205.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foulis, D., Piron, C. & Randall, C. Realism, operationalism, and quantum mechanics. Found Phys 13, 813–841 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01906271

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01906271

Keywords

Navigation