Abstract
The language of manuals may be used to discuss inference in measurement in a general experimental context. Specializing to the context of the frame manual for Hilbert space, this inference leads to state dominance of the inferred state from partial measurements; this in turn, by Sakai's theorem, determines observables which are described by positive operator-valued measures. Symmetries are then introduced, showing that systems of covariance, rather than systems of imprimitivity, are natural objects to study in quantum mechanics. Experiments measuring different polarization components simultaneously are reexamined in this language. Finally, implications of the Naimark extension theorem for the manual approach are investigated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C. H. Randall, “A Mathematical Foundation for Empirical Science—with Special Reference to Quantum Theory—Part I. A Calculus of Experimental Propositions,” Ph.D. Thesis (directed by Carlton E. Lemke), Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1966, 211 pp. C. H. Randall and D. Foulis,J. Math. Phys. 11, 1667–1675 (1972);14, 1472–1480 (1973); C. H. Randall and D. Foulis, “The empirical logic approach to the physical sciences,” inLecture Notes in Physics No. 29. Foundations of Quantum Mechanics and Ordered Linear Spaces, A. Hartkamper and H. Neumann, eds. (Springer, Heidelberg, 1974), pp., 230–249; C. H. Randall and D. Foulis, “A mathematical setting for inductive reasoning,” inFoundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science III, C. Hooker and W. Harper, eds. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1976), pp. 169–205; C. H. Randall and D. Foulis, “The operational approach to quantum mechanics,” inThe Logico-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics III (University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science), C. Hooker, ed. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1978), pp. 167–201; C. H. Randall, D. Foulis, and C. Piron,Found. Phys. 13, 813–842 (1983); C. H. Randall and D. Foulis,Found. Phys. 13, 843–863 (1983); C. H. Randall and D. Foulis, “Dirac revisited,” inTransactions, Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics, Joensuu, Finland, P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1985), pp. 97–112; C. H. Randall, D. Foulis, and M. Kläy,Int. J. Theor. Phys. 26, 199–219 (1987).
I. Gelfand and M. A. Naimark,Mat. Sborn., N.S. 12[54], 197–217 (1943); I. E. Segal,Ann. Math. 48, 930–948 (1947); M. A. Naimark,Normed Rings (Noordhoff, Groningen, 1964), pp. 242–245; S. Sakai,C*-Algebras and W*-Algebras (Ergebnisse der Mathematik und Ihrer Grenzgebiete, 60) (Springer, New York, 1971), p. 40; G. G. Emch,Algebraic Methods in Statistical Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1972), pp. 71–73.
M. A. Naimark, ; pp. 262–264; S. Sakai,op. cit., pp. 76–77; G. G. Emch,op. cit., pp. 86–87; S. Sakai,Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 71, 149–151 (1965).
J.-P. Marchand,Found. Phys. 7, 35–49 (1977); J.-P. Marchand and W. Wyss,J. Stat. Phys. 16, 349–355 (1977); S. Gudder and J.-P. Marchand,Rep. Math. Phys. 12, 317–329 (1977); R. W. Benoist, J.-P. Marchand, and W. Yourgrau,Found. Phys. 7, 827–833 (1977) and8, 117–118 (1978); S. Gudder, J.-P. Marchand, and W. Wyss,J. Math. Phys. 20, 1963–1966 (1979); R. W. Benoist and J.-P. Marchand,Lett. Math. Phys. 3, 169–173 (1979).
A. S. Wightman,Rev. Mod. Phys. 34, 845–872 (1962).
E. Prugovecki,Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Spacetime (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984); S. T. Ali,Can. Math. Bull. 27, 390–397 (1984); S. T. Ali, “Stochastic Localization, Quantum Mechanics on Phase Space and Quantum Space-time,”Rev. Nuovo Cimento 11, 1–128 (1985); S. T. Ali and E. Prugovecki,Acta Appl. Math. 6, 1–18, 19–45, 47–62 (1986); F. E. Schroeck, Jr.,Found. Phys. 12, 825–841 (1982).
P. Busch,J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 18, 3351–3354 (1985); P. Busch and P. J. Lahti,Phys. Lett. A 115, 259–264 (1986); P. Busch,Phys. Rev. D 33, 2253–2261 (1986); F. E. Schroeck, Jr.,J. Math. Phys. 22, 2562–2572 (1981); F. E. Schroeck, Jr.,Found. Phys. 12, 479–497 (1982); F. E. Schroeck, Jr.,Found. Phys. 15, 677–681 (1985); F. E. Schroeck, Jr.,J. Math. Phys. 26, 306–310 (1985).
I. Daubeschies and T. Paul,Inverse Probl. 4, 661–680 (1988); I. Daubeschies,IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 34, 605–612 (1988); F. E. Schroeck, Jr.,Int. J. Theor. Phys. 28, 247–262 (1989).
P. Mittelstaedt, A. Prieur, and R. Schieder,Found. Phys. 17, 891–904 (1987).
P. Busch,Found. Phys. 17, 905–937 (1987).
A. M. Gleason,J. Math. Mech. 6, 885–893 (1957); M. Eilers and E. Horst,Int. J. Theor. Phys. 13, 419–424 (1975).
G. Ludwig,Foundations of Quantum Mechanics I and II (Springer, New York, 1983 and 1985); G. Ludwig,An Axiomatic Basis for Quantum Mechanics I and II (Springer, New York, 1985).
G. T. Rüttiman,Non-commutative Measure Theory, Habilitationsschrift, Universität Bern, 1980; G. T. Rüttimann, “Quantum logic and convex structures,” inRecent Developments in Quantum Logic, P. Mittelstaedt and E.-W. Stachow, eds. (Bibliographisches Institut, Zürich, 1985), pp. 319–328.
P. Mittelstaedt and E. W. Stachow,Int. J. Theor. Phys. 22, 517–540 (1983).
F. Riesz and B. Sz-Nagy,Functional Analysis, Leo F. Boron, translator, Appendix (Ungar, New York, 1960).
P. Busch and F. E. Schroeck, Jr.,Found Phys. 19, 807–872 (1989).
B. C. Van Fraassen,Synthese 34, 133–166 (1977).
G. Cassinelli and P. Lahti,Found, Phys. 19, 873–890 (1989).
G. G. Emch,. pp. 33–224.
T. Cook,Int. J. Theor. Phys. 24, 1113–1131 (1985).
F. E. Schroeck, Jr.,Found. Phys. 15, 279–302 (1985) especially p. 285.
F. E. Schroeck, Jr.,Int. J. Theor. Phys. 28, 247–262 (1989).
J. P. Marchand,Found Phys. 7, 35–49 (1977), especially p. 48.
P. A. M. Dirac,Quantum Mechanics, 4th edn. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1958), pp. 34–52.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schroeck, F.E., Foulis, D.J. Stochastic quantum mechanics viewed from the language of manuals. Found Phys 20, 823–858 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01889693
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01889693