Skip to main content
Log in

Refinement and unique Mackey decomposition for manuals and orthalogebras

  • Part II. Invited Papers Dedicated To The Memory Of Charles H. Randall (1928–1987)
  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the empirical logic approach to quantum mechanics, the physical system under consideration is given in terms of a manual of sample spaces. The resulting propositional structure has been shown to form an orthoalgebra, generalizing the structure of an orthomodular poset. An orthoalgebra satisfies the unique Mackey decomposition (UMD) property if, given two commuting propositions a and b, there is a unique jointly orthogonal triple (e, f, c) such that a=e⊕c and b=f⊕c. In a manual, E is refined by F if E is logically equivalent to some partition of F, making results from F at least as informative as those from E. The main result is a characterization of the UMD property in terms of the refinement structure of an underlying manual, provided the manual is event saturated and orthogonally additive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. A. Cook and G. T. Rüttimann, “Symmetries on quantum logics,”Rep. Math. Phys. 21, 121–126 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Cristescu,Ordered Vector Spaces and Linear Operators (Abacus Press, Tunbridge Wells, 1976), translation by S. Teleman.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. J. Foulis, “Coupled physical systems,”Found. Phys. 19, 905–922 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Foulis, C. Piron, and C. Randall, “Realism, operationalism, and quantum mechanics,”Found. Phys. 13, 813–841 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Gaudard, “Convergence of posterior probabilities in the Bayesian inference strategy,”Found. Phys. 15, 49–62 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. J. Greechie, “A particular non-atomistic orthomodular poset,”Commun. Math. Phys. 14, 326–328 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. P. Gudder and G. T. Rüttimann, “Observables on hypergraphs,”Found. Phys. 16, 773–790 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Kalmbach,Orthomodular Lattices (Academic Press, New York, 1983), p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Klay, C. Randall, and D. Foulis, “Tensor products and probability weights,”Int. J. Theor. Phys. 26, 199–219 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. F. Lock and G. M. Hardegree, “Connections among quantum logics. Part I. Quantum propositional logics,”Int. J. Theor. Phys. 24, 43–53 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. W. Mackey,Mathematical Foundation of Quantum Mechanics (Benjamin, New York, 1963), Chap. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Pulmannová, “Joint distributions of observables on spectral logics,”Rep. Math. Phys. 26, 67–71 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. H. Randall,A Mathematical Foundation for Empirical Science—with Special Reference to Quantum Theory, Part I, a Calculus of Experimental Propositions, Ph.D. Dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (G. E. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, unclassified TR 3147, 1966), p. 136.

  14. C. H. Randall and D. J. Foulis, “Operational statistics. II. Manuals of operations and their logics,”J. Math. Phys. 14, 1472–1480 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. H. Randall and D. J. Foulis, “A mathematical setting for inductive reasoning,” in W. L. Harper and C. A. Hooker, eds.,Foundations of Probability Theory Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1976), pp. 169–205.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. H. Randall and D. J. Foulis, “Stochastic entities,” in P. Mittelstaedt and E. W. Stachow, eds.,Recent Developments in Quantum Logic (Wissenschaftsverlag, Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim, 1985), pp. 265–284.

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. T. Rüttimann, “Detectible properties and spectral quantum logics,” in H. Neumann, ed.,Interpretations and Foundations of Quantum Theories (Wissenschaftsverlag, Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim, 1981), pp. 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. T. Rüttimann, “The approximate Jordan-Hahn decomposition,” preprint.

  19. G. Svetlichny, “Quantum supports and modal logic,”Found. Phys. 16, 1285–1295 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. B. Younce,Random Variables on non-Boolean Structures, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, DAI 48, #2 (1987).

  21. M. B. Younce, “The infimum of Cauchy structures with applications in operator theory,” in J. Adámek and S. MacLane, eds.,Categorical Topology and its Relation to Analysis, Algebra and Combinatorics (Proceedings, Prague, Aug. 22–26, 1988) (World Scientific, Singapore, 1990), pp. 181–194.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Younce, M.B. Refinement and unique Mackey decomposition for manuals and orthalogebras. Found Phys 20, 691–700 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01889455

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01889455

Keywords

Navigation