Skip to main content
Log in

Polymicrobial bacteremia in critically ill patients

  • Originals
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To characterize the epidemiology of polymicrobial bacteremia (PMB) among critically ill patients.

Design

Prospective clinical study.

Setting

University medical center.

Patients

All patients with positive blood cultures in a medical-surgical ICU.

Measurements

PMB represents 8.4% of all true bacteremia in our ICU. Most of these patients were post-operative but none had malignancies or significant immunodepression. Over three-quarters of the episodes were nosocomial. No significant differences in factors associated with PMB were found when they were compared with a cohort of 154 monomicrobial episodes. Enterobacteriaceae were the most common organisms. Intravascular devices (42.8%) were the most common source of PMB, followed by intra-abdominal origin (21.4%). The overall mortality was 7.1%, a lower rate than has previously been described.

Conclusions

We suggest catheter replacement in patients who develop PMB and improving techniques of catheter maintenance in order to reduce its incidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reuben AG, Musher DM, Hamill RJ, Brouke I (1989) Polymicrobial bacteremia: clinical and microbiologic patterns. Rev Infect Dis 11:161–183

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cooper GS, Haulir DS, Shlaes DM, Salata RA (1990) Polymicrobial bacteremia in the late 1980s: predictors of outcome and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 2:114–123

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gatell JM, Trilla A, Latorre X, Almela M, Mensa J, Moreno A, Miro JM, Martinez JA, Jimenez de Anta MT, Soriano E, Garcia San Miguel J (1988) Nosocomial bacteremia in a large Spanish teaching hospital: analysis of factors influencing prognosis. Rev Infect Dis 10:203–210

    Google Scholar 

  4. Maki DG, Weise CE, Sarafin HW (1977) A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous catheter-related infection. N Engl J Med 296:1305–1309

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lennette EH, Balows A, Hausler WJ, Shadomy HJ (ed) (1985) Manual of clinical microbiology, 4th edn. American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ing AF, McLean PH, Meakins J (1981) Multiple organism bacteremia in the surgical intensive care unit: a sign of intraperitoneal sepsis. Surgery 90:779–886

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kiani D, Quinn EL, Burch KH, Madhaun T, Saravolatz LD, Neblett TR (1979) The increasing importance of polymicrobial bacteremia. JAMA 242:1044–1047

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mackowiak PA, Browne RH, Southern PM, Smith JW (1980) Polymicrobial sepsis: an analysis of 184 cases using log linear models. Am J Med Sci 290:73–80

    Google Scholar 

  9. Roselle GA, Watanakunakorn C (1979) Polymicrobial bacteremia. JAMA 242:2411–2413

    Google Scholar 

  10. Monif GR, Baer H (1976) Polymicrobial bacteremia in obstetric patients. Obstet Gynecol 48:167–169

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dupont HL, Spink WW (1969) Infections due to gram-negative organisms: An analysis of 860 patients with bacteremia at the University of Minnesota Medical Center, 1958–1966. Medicine 48:307–332

    Google Scholar 

  12. Elting LS, Bodey GP, Fainstein V (1986) Polymicrobial septicemia in the cancer patient. Medicine 65:218–225

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hermans PE, Washington JA (1970) Polymicrobial bacteremia. Ann Intern Med 73:387–392

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kreger BE, Craven DE, Carling PC, McCabe WR (1980) Gramnegative bacteremia IV. Reevaluation of clinical features and treatment in 612 patients. Am J Med 68:344–355

    Google Scholar 

  15. Maki DG (1989) Risk factors for nosocomial infection in intensive care. Arch Intern Med 149:30–33

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ponce de Leon S, Critchely S, Wenzel RP (1984) Polymicrobial bloodstream infections related to prolonged vascular catheterization. Crit Care Med 12:856–859

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moyer MA, Edwards LD, Farley L (1983). Comparative culture methods on 101 intravenous catheters: routine, semiquantitative, and blood cultures. Arch Intern Med 143:66–69

    Google Scholar 

  18. Collignon PJ, Soni N, Pearson LY, Woods WP, Munro R, Sorrell TC (1986) Is semiquantitative culture central vein catheter tips useful in the diagnosis of catheter-related bacteremia? J Clin Microbiol 24:532–535

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rello J, Coll P, Prats G (1991) Laboratory diagnosis of catheter-related bacteremia. Scand J Infect Dis 23:583–588

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rello J, Gatell JM, Almirall J, Campistol JM, Gonzalez J, Puig de la Bellacasa J (1989) Evaluation of culture techniques for identification of catheter-related infection in hemodialysis patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 8:620–622

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cleri DJ, Corrado ML, Seligman SJ (1980) Quantitative culture of intravenous catheters and other intravascular inserts. J Infect Dis 141:781–786

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brun-Buisson C, Abrouk F, Legrand P, Huet Y, Larabi S, Rapin M (1987) Diagnosis of central venous catheter-related sepsis: Critical level of quantitative tip cultures. Arch Intern Med 147:873–877

    Google Scholar 

  23. Boey JH, Way LW (1980) Acute cholangitis. Ann Surg 191:264–270

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shimada K, Naro T, Inamabu T, Urayama K, Adachi K (1981) Bacteriology of acute obstructive cholangitis of the aged. J Clin Microbiol 14:522–526

    Google Scholar 

  25. Siegman-Igra Y, Schwartz D, Konforti N, Perluk C, Rozin RR (1988) Septicemia from biliary tract infection. Arch Surg 123:366–368

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rello, J., Quintana, E., Mirelis, B. et al. Polymicrobial bacteremia in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 19, 22–25 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01709273

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01709273

Key words

Navigation