Abstract
Critically ill patients transferred between hospitals are often inadequately monitored in transit, with outcome adversely affected. In 22 such patients, we compared direct and palpated measurements of systolic pressure, oscilloscopic and aneroid manometric measurements of mean pressure, ECG and palpated measurements of heart-rate and clinical and oximetric assessments of oxygenation. On average, palpated readings of systolic pressure under-read direct readings by 29% and palpated readings of heart-rate under-read ECG readings by 2%. The mean difference between oscilloscopic and manometric readings of mean pressure was zero. Oxygen saturation readings did not reach a level which allowed valid comparison. If direct measurement of heart-rate and blood pressure by battery-powered monitors is not feasible, palpation of heart-rate and manometric measurement of mean arterial pressure are acceptable alternatives during secondary transport of the critically ill.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wright IH, McDonald JC, Rogers PN, Ledingham IMcA (1988) Provision of facilities for secondary transport of seriously ill patients in the United Kingdom. Br Med J 296:543–545
Gentleman D, Jennett B (1981) Hazards of inter-hospital transfer of comatose head-injured patients. Lancet II:853–855
Bion JF, Wilson IH, Taylor PA (1988) Transporting critically ill patients by ambulance: audit by sickness scoring. Br Med J 296:170
Zorab JSM (1969) Continous display of the arterial pressure: a simple manometric technique. Anaesthesia 24:431–437
Allan MWB, Gray WM, Asbury AJ (1988) Measurement of arterial pressure using catheter-transducer systems. Br J Anaesth 60:413–418
Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. I:307–310
Taylor MB, Whitwam JG (1988) The accuracy of pulse oximeters. A comparative clinical evaluation of five pulse oximeters. Anaesthesia 43:229–232
Konarzewski WH, Banerjee A (1988) Transporting critically ill patients by ambulance. Br Med J 296:645 (letter)
Waddell G, Stuart B, Tehrani MA, McGarrity G, Reyes A, Smith HC, Ledingham IMcA (1975) Intra-arterial monitoring of critically ill patients in ambulances. Br Med J 4:206
Gardner RM (1981) Direct blood pressure measurement—dynamic response requirements. Anesthesiology 54:227–236
Goldhill DR (1986) Bilateral simultaneous indirect systolic blood pressure measurements. Cardiovasc Res 20:774–777
Snook R (1972) Medical aspects of ambulance design. Br Med J 3:574–578
Cohn JN (1967) Blood pressure measurement in shock: mechanism of inaccuracy in auscultatory and palpatory methods. JAMA 199:118–122
O'Rourke MF, Blazek JV, Moreels CL, Krovetz LJ (1955) Pressure wave transmission along the human aorta—changes with age and in arterial degenerative disease. Circ Res 23:567–579
Gravlee GP, Wong AB, Adkins TG, Case LD, Pauca AL (1989) A comparison of radial, brachial and aortic pressures after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Anesth 3:20–26
Abou-Madi M, Lenis S, Archer D, Ravussin P, Trop D (1986) Comparison of direct blood pressure measurements at the radial and dorsalis pedis arteries during sodium nitroprusside- and isoflurane-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 65:692–695
Slogoff S, Keats AS, Arlund C (1983) On the safety of radial artery cannulation. Anesthesiology 59:42–47
Severinghaus J (1957) Aneroid manometer for arterial blood pressure. Anesthesiology 24:872
Dawson ADG, Babington PCB (1987) an intensive care trolley—an economical and viable alternative to the MICU. Anaesth Intensive Care 15:229–233
Hickey DD (1986) A simple device for the direct measurement of mean arterial pressure and for calibration of arterial pressure monitors. J Med Eng Technol 10:188–192
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Runcie, C.J., Reeve, W., Reidy, J. et al. A comparison of measurements of blood pressure, heart-rate and oxygenation during inter-hospital transport of the critically ill. Intensive Care Med 16, 317–322 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01706357
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01706357