Skip to main content
Log in

Stressed organizations and organizational stressors: A systemic analysis of workplace injury

  • Published:
International Journal of Stress Management

Abstract

The experiences of five injured workers from one workplace which had been identified as having a very poor workers' compensation claims experience were analyzed using a systemic theory framework. It was predicted that the fundamental stress-producing conflict between safety and profit that exists in industry between workers and their employers is exacerbated when a worker is injured; furthermore, the degree of stress experienced by both the injured worker and the employer is related to the impact of the injury on the organization and on the productivity of the workplace. The increased stress in both the injured worker and the employer results in increased rigidity in responding to the change or threat in the organization caused by workplace injury. A systemic approach to rehabilitation was recommended in which the employer as well as the injured worker were viewed as clients who required varying levels of support and intervention in managing workplace injury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berger, Y. (1993). The Hoechst dispute: A paradigm shift in Occupational Health and Safety. In M. Quinlan (Ed.),Work and health. The origins, management and regulation of occupational illness (pp. 126–139). Melbourne, Australia: Macmillan Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggins, D. (1986). Focus on occupational health: What can be done?New Doctor, 47, 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, M. (1966). The use of family theory in clinical practice.Clinical Psychiatry, 7, 345–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, M. (1978).Family therapy in clinical practice. New York: Jason Aranson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callus, R., Morehead, A., Cully, M., & Buchanan, J. (1991).Industrial relations at work. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottone, R. R., & Emener, W. G. (1990). The psychomedical paradigm of vocational rehabilitation and its alternatives.Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 34, 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A., & George, J. (1988).States of health: Health and illness in Australia. Sydney: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawis, R. V. (1986). The Minnesota Theory of Work Adjustment. In B. Bolton (Ed.),Handbook of measurement and evaluation in rehabilitation. Baltimore, MN: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, S. (1988). Occupational medicine in Australia: The past, the present and the future.Journal of Occupational Health and Safety-Australia and New Zealand, 4, 481–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesketh, B., & Adams, A. (Eds.) (1991).Psychological perspective on occupational health and rehabilitation. Sydney, Australia: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. (1981).Foundations of family therapy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, C. R. (1989). Social Sequelae of Occupational Injury and Illness. Unpublished PhD thesis, Griffith University, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, R., & Quinlan, M. (1993). The origins, management and regulation of occupational illness: An overview. In M. Quinlan (Ed.),Work and health: The origins, management and regulation of occupational illness (pp. 3–32). Melbourne, Australia: Macmillan Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. T. (1995).Occupational rehabilitation assessed: The verdict of injured workers. Unpublished paper presented to the WorkCover Authority of New South Wales.

  • Kenny, D. T. (1995a). Common themes, different perspectives: A systemic analysis of employer-employee experiences of occupational rehabilitation.Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 39, 1, 54–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. T. (1995b). Failures in occupational rehabilitation: A case study analysis.Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling, 1, 1, 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, C. T., Oldham, G. R., & Hackman, J. R. (1987). Work design as an approach to person-environment fit.Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 31, 276–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, M. (Ed.) (1993).Work and health. The origins, management and regulation of occupational illness. Melbourne, Australia: Macmillan Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, M., & Bohle, P. (1991).Managing Occupational Health and Safety in Australia. South Melbourne, Australia: Macmillan Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandstrom, J., & Esbjornsson, E. (1986). Return to work after rehabilitation.Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 18, 29–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Selye, H. (1975).The stress of life (rev. ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate, D. G. (1992) Factors influencing injured employees return to work.Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 23, 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C., & Thorpe, B. (1992).Beyond industrial sociology. Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • WorkCover Authority (1992).WorkCover Statistics. New South Wales: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Workers Compensation Act (1987). New South Wales: Government Information Service.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kenny, D.T. Stressed organizations and organizational stressors: A systemic analysis of workplace injury. Int J Stress Manage 2, 181–196 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01681848

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01681848

Key words

Navigation