Skip to main content
Log in

Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of the organisation of curricula, teaching, and assessment on student learning and looks at the different demands which different academic environments make on their students. After a brief review of research into learning contexts in higher education, data from a course perceptions questionnaire are presented. The principal dimensions which students themselves use to characterise academic environments are identified. The perceptions of students in six departments at one British university are compared; it is concluded that students in different subject areas see themselves to be studying in markedly different environments. The results also suggest students' evaluations of the teaching and the courses in each department.

Data from the course perceptions questionnaire are supported and amplified by a preliminary analysis of results from semi-structured interviews of students in the six departments. The most important factor to emerge from the item analysis — the degree to which students feel that their teachers provide a facilitant atmosphere for learning — is confirmed. Students' perceptions of their departments and their teachers are shown to exert important influences on their approaches to learning. It is also suggested that a student's perception of a particular learning task influences the level at which he tackles it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astin, A. W. (1968).The College Environment. Washinton, D.C.: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S., Geer, B., and Hughes, E. C. (1968).Making the Grade: The Academic Side of College Life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. B. (1971). “On the Classification and Framing of Educational Knowledge,” in M. F. D. Young, ed.,Knowledge and Control. pp. 47–69, London: Collier-Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1970). “Faculty patterns in study behaviour,”Australian Journal of Psychology 22 (2): 161–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J. A. (1976). “Student Ratings of Instruction and their Relationship to Student Learning” Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. and Trow, M. (1966). “The Organisational Context” in T. M. Newcomb and E. K. Wilson, eds.,College Peer Groups: Problems and Prospects for Research. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J. and Wilson, J. D. (1977).Degrees of Excellence: The Academic Achievement Game. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaff, J. G. and Wilson, R. C. (1971). “Faculty cultures and interdisciplinary study,”Journal of Higher Education 42(3): 186–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaff, J. G., Crombag, H. F. M., and Chang, T. M. (1976). “Environments for learning in a Dutch university,”Higher Education 5: 285–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsey, A. H. and Trow, M. (1971).The British Academics. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartnett, R. T. and Centra, J. A. (1977). “The effects of academic departments on student learning,”Journal of Higher Education 48(5): 491–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, B. M. J. (1979). “Student and System: Academic Success and Study Problems in Relation with Characteristics of the Academic Environment and of the Students,” in E. A. van Trotsenburg, ed.,Higher Education: A Field of Study. 5 vols. Bern: Verlag Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, S. (1978). “Student types and the evaluation of the university,”Higher Education 6: 417–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1975a). “What Does it Take to Learn?” in N. J. Entwistle and D. J. Hounsell, eds.,How Students Learn. Lancaster: IPCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1975b).Non-verbatim Learning I: Level of Processing and Level of Outcome. Report No. 39, Institute of Education, University of Göteborg.

  • Marton, F. and Säljö, R. (1976). “On qualitative differences in learning: I — Outcome and process”British Journal of Educational Psychology 46: 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. M. L. and Parlett, M. (1974).Up to the Mark: A Study of the Examination Game. London: SRHE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, C. R. (1967).College and University Environment Scales. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Percy, K. A. and Ramsden, P. (1979).Freedom and Learning in Higher Education. (provisional title) Guildford: SRHE. (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. E. (1965). “On a Typology of College Students” Research Bulletin, RB 65-9. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1976).Course Evaluation in Higher Education. Unpublished MPhil dissertation, CNAA.

  • Ramsden, P. (1979). “Identifying dimensions of learning environments in higher education,” (in preparation).

  • Rogers, C. (1969).Freedom to Learn. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, B. R. (1971).The Hidden Curriculum. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, C. G. (1970).People in Context. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wankowski, J. A. (1973).Temperament, Motivation and Academic Achievement. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Educational Survey.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research reported in this paper is supported by a Social Science Research Council programme grant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramsden, P. Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment. High Educ 8, 411–427 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01680529

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01680529

Keywords

Navigation