Skip to main content
Log in

A prospective cooperative study of antimicrobial decontamination in granulocytopenic patients. Comparison of two different methods

Antimikrobielle Dekontamination bei granulozytopenischen Patienten. Vergleich zweier Verfahren in einer prospektiven, kooperativen Studie

  • Originalia
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In a cooperative and prospectively randomized study, two different methods of antimicrobial decontamination of the digestive tract with oral, non-absorbable antibiotics were compared in neutropenic patients. In the first treatment group, the antibiotics were selected on the basis of the outcome of sensitivity tests performed on the flora of the patients. The other treatment group was given a standard combination of neomycin, cephaloridin, polymyxin B or E and nystatin or amphotericin B. Complete data from a total of 35 patients were received at the Statistical Center, and a minimum of 1.5 oral washings and faecal samples per week arrived at the Central Bacteriological Laboratory. There was no substantial difference in the clinical parameters of the patients in both treatment groups. Both methods for decontamination were found to be effective. The incidence of acquired infections and the quality of decontamination were almost identical in both groups. As far as the average number of negative cultures per patient is concerned, the results for both treatment groups are well in line with the data found in other studies using a combination of gentamicin, vancomycin and nystatin.

Zusammenfassung

In einer kooperativen prospektiv randomisierten Studie wurden zwei verschiedene Verfahren der totalen antimikrobiellen Dekontamination des Verdauungstrakts mit oralen, nicht resorbierbaren Antibiotika bei granulozytopenischen Patienten miteinander verglichen. In der ersten Therapiegruppe wurden die Antibiotika aufgrund einer Sensibilitätstestung der Bakterien der Darmflora ausgewählt. Die andere Therapiegruppe erhielt eine Standardkombination aus Neomycin, Cephaloridin, Polymyxin B oder E und Nystatin oder Amphotericin B. Von insgesamt 35 Patienten erhielt das Statistische Zentrum komplette Datensätze und das bakteriologische Zentrallabor mindestens 1,5 Proben pro Patient pro Woche von Rachenspülflüssigkeit und Stuhl. Die klinischen Parameter der Patienten beider Therapiegruppen unterschieden sich nicht wesentlich. Beide Verfahren der antimikrobiellen Dekontamination erwiesen sich als wirksam. Die Qualität der Dekontamination war in beiden Therapiegruppen nahezu identisch. Auch in der Häufigkeit von erworbenen Infektionen ergaben sich keine signifikanten Unterschiede. Die Häufigkeit negativer Kulturen war vergleichbar mit den Ergebnissen anderer Studien, in denen eine Kombination von Gentamicin, Vancomycin und Nystatin angewandt wurde.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  1. E.O.R.T.C. International Antimicrobial Therapy Group Three antibiotic regimens in the treatment of infection in febrile granulocytopenic patients with cancer. J. Infect. Dis. 137 (1978) 14–29.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Guiot, H., van Furth, R. Partial antibiotic decontamination. Br. Med. J. I (1977) 800–802.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sleijfer, D. Th., Mulder, N. H., De Vries-Hospers, H. G., Fidler, V., Nieweg, H. O., Waaij, D. van der, Van Saene, H. K. F. Infection prevention in granulocytopenic patients by selective decontamination of the digestive tract. Eur. J. Cancer 16 (1980) 859–869.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Preisler, H. D., Goldstein, I. M., Henderson, E. S. Gastrointestinal “sterilization” in the treatment of patients with acute leukemia. Cancer 26 (1970) 1076–1081.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bodey, G. P., Gehan, E. A., Freireich, E. J., Frei, E. Protected environment-prophylactic antibiotic program in the chemotherapy of acute leukemia. Am J. Med. Sci. 262 (1971) 138–151.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Levine, A. S., Siegel, S. E., Schreiber, A. D., Hauser, J., Preisler, H. D., Goldstein, I. M., Seidler, F., Simon, R., Perry, S., Bennett, J. E., Henderson, E. S. Protected environments and prophylactic antibiotics. A prospective controlled study of their utility in the therapy of acute leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 288 (1973) 477–483.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schimpff, S. C., Greene, W. H., Young, V. M., Fortner, C. L., Jepsen, L., Cusack, N., Block, J. B., Wiernik, P. H. Infection prevention in acute nonlymphocytic leukaemia. Ann. Intern. Med. 82 (1975) 351–358.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dietrich, M., Gaus, W., Vossen, J., Waaij, D. van der, Wendt, F. (E.O.R.T.C. Gnotobiotic Project Group Writing Committee): Protective isolation and antimicrobial decontamination in patients with high susceptibility to infection. A prospective study of Gnotobiotic care in acute leukaemia patients. I. Clinical results. Infection 5 (1977) 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dankert, J., Gaus, W., Gaya, H., Krieger, D., Linzenmeier, G., Waaij, D. van der (E.O.R.T.C. Gnotobiotic Project Group Writing Committee): Protective isolation and antimicrobial decontamination in patients with high susceptibility to infection. A prospective cooperative study of Gnotobiotic care. III: The quality of isolation and decontamination. Infection 6 (1978) 175–191.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dietrich, M., Gaus, W., Vossen, J. M., Wendt, F., Waaij, D. van der (E.O.R.T.C. Gnotobiotic Project Group Writing Committee): Protocol for a comparative study of two methods for decontamination of the digestive tract. Infection 6 (1978) 78–80.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dietrich, M., Abt, C., Pflieger, H. Experiences with a new isolated bed system in the treatment of acute leukaemia. Med. Prog. Technol. 3 (1975) 85–89.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Waaij, D. van der, Vossen, J. M., Korthals Alters, C. Patient isolators designed in The Netherlands. In:Heneghan, J. B. (ed.): Germfree Research; biological effects of gnotobiotic environment. Academic Press, New York 1973, pp. 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Waaij, D. van der, De Vries, J. M., Lekkerkerk, J. E. C. Eliminating bacteria from monkeys with antibiotics. In:Balner, H., Beveridge, W. I. B. (eds.): Infections and immunosuppression in subhuman primates. Munksgaard, Copenhagen 1970, pp. 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vries-Hospers, H. G. de, Waaij, D. van der Amphotericin B concentrations in saliva after application of 2% amphotericin B in orabase. Infection 6 (1978) 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goss, W. A., Cimijotti, B. Evaluation of an automatic diluting device for microbiological applications. Appl. Microbiol. 16 (1968) 1414–1416.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Waaij, D. van der, Vossen, J. M.: Antibiotic decontamination in animals and in human patients. Proceedings of the first intersectional congress of the International Association of Microbiological Societies Science Council of Japan, Tokyo 1975, pp. 233–249.

  17. Levi, J. A., Vincent, P. C., Jennis, F., Lind, D. E., Gun, F. W. Prophylactic oral antibiotics in the management of acute leukemia. Med. J. Aust. 1 (1973) 1025–1029.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yates, J., Holland, J. F. A controlled study of isolation and endogenous microbial suppression in acute myelocytic leukemia patients. Cancer 32 (1972) 1490–1498.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Consortia

Additional information

Prof. Dr.W. Gaus, Abteilung Klinische Dokumentation, Universität Ulm, Eyth-Straße 2, D-7900 Ulm;

Dr.E. Kurrle, Department für Innere Medizin, Abteilung Innere Medizin III, Universität Ulm, Steinhövelstraße 9, D-7900 Ulm;

Prof. Dr.G. Linzenmeier, Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Universität Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, D-4300 Essen;

Dr.M. R. Nowrousian, Tumor-Klinik, Universität Essen, Hufeland-straße 53, D-4300 Essen;

Dr.H. de Vries-Hospers, Prof. Dr.D. van der Waaij, Laboratory for Medical Microbiology R. U., Oostersingel 59, 9713 EZ Groningen, The Netherlands.

Requests for reprints: Prof. Dr.D. van der Waaij

Writing Committee for the Gnotobiotic Project Group:W. Gaus, E. Kurrle, G. Linzenmeier, R. Nowrousian, H. de Vries-Hospers, D. van der Waaij

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

E.O.R.T.C. Gnotobiotic Project Group. A prospective cooperative study of antimicrobial decontamination in granulocytopenic patients. Comparison of two different methods. Infection 10, 131–138 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01640762

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01640762

Keywords

Navigation