Skip to main content
Log in

Basic anatomical investigation of semitendinosus and the long head of biceps femoris muscle for their possible use in electrically stimulated neosphincter formation

Bases anatomiques de l'utilisation du muscle semitendineux et du chef long du biceps fémoral comme néosphincter anal électro-stimulé

  • Anatomic Bases Of Medical, Radiological And Surgical Techniques
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Anal neosphincter formation with electrically stimulated gracilis muscle is used increasingly for the surgical treatment of fecal incontinence. An alternative to gracilis might be of interest if this muscle is not available. 30 semitendinosus muscles and 15 long heads of biceps femoris were investigated on human cadavers. In particular, the nerve and vascular supply of these muscles was studied, both representing basic factors for muscle transposition. The long head of biceps femoris m. was found to receive its dominant vascular supply from the first and second perforating artery and its nerve supply from one motor branch out of the sciatic nerve, both as described in literature. The examination of semitendinosus m., however, revealed new anatomical aspects in its vascular supply. In all cases semitendinosus m. was found to receive dominant vascular pedicles from the medial circumflex femoral artery close to the ischial tuberosity and the second perforating artery. The nerve supply consisted of two motor branches out of the sciatic nerve. Both muscles fulfilled several basic criterias for transposition to the anus. However, regarding these requirements, semitendinosus offered distinct advantages in comparison with the long head of biceps femoris. Due to its vascular and nerve topography, semitendinosus seems suitable to serve as an alternative to gracilis.

Résumé

La graciloplastie électro-stimulée est utilisée de plus en plus fréquemment dans le traitement chirurgical de l'incontinence anale. L'utilisation d'un autre muscle peut être intéressante si le muscle gracile n'est pas utilisable. 30 muscles semitendineux et 15 longs chefs du biceps fémoral ont été étudiés sur des cadavres humains. Ce travail a porté particulièrement sur l'innervation et la vascularisation de ces muscles, dont dépendent les possibilités de transposition. Le long chef du m. biceps fémoral recevait sa vascularisation principale de la première et de la deuxième artère perforante et son innervation d'une branche motrice venant du nerf sciatique, tel que cela est décrit dans la littérature. L'étude du m. semitendineux a montré de nouveaux aspects anatomiques dans sa vascularisation. Dans tous les cas ce muscle recevait sa vascularisation principale de l'artère circonflexe médiale près de la tubérosité ischiatique et de la deuxième a. perforante. Son innervation venait de deux branches motrices du nerf sciatique. Ces deux muscles répondaient aux critères nécessaires pour leur transposition comme néo sphincter. Cependant, compte-tenu de sa vascularisation et de son innervation, le m. semitendineux répond mieux aux impératifs anatomiques que le long chef du biceps et représente une alternative au muscle gracile pour la création d'un néo sphincter anal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baeten C, Spaans F, Fluks A (1988) An implanted neuromuscular stimulator for fecal continence following previously implanted gracilis muscle. Dis Col Rect 31: 134–137

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baeten CGMI, Konsten J, Spaans F, Visser R, Habets AMMC, Bourgeois IM, Wagenmakers AJM, Soeters PB (1991) Dynamic graciloplasty for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 338: 1163–1165

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baker DC, Barton FE, Marquis Converse J (1978) A combined biceps and semitendinosus muscle flap in the repair of ischial sores. Br J Plast Surg 31: 26–28

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Benninghoff A, Fleischhauer K (Hrsg) (1985) Makroskopische und mikroskopische Anatomie des Menschen, Band 2. Kreislauf und Eingeweide, 13/14th edn. Urban & Schwarzenberg, München, p 105

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frohse F, Fränkel M (1913) Handbuch der Anatomie des Menschen, Band 2/2/2/B. Die Muskeln des menschlichen Beines, 22nd edn. Verlag Gustav Fischer, Jena, pp 533–542

    Google Scholar 

  6. George BD, Williams NS, Patel J, Swash M, Watkins ES (1993) Physiological and histochemical adaptation of the electrically stimulated gracilis muscle to neoanal sphincter function. Br J Surg 80: 1342–1346

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hafferl A (1957) Lehrbuch der topographischen Anatomie, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p 818

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hentz VR (1982) Construction of a rectal sphincter using the origin of the gluteus maximus muscle. Plast Reconstr Surg 70: 82–85

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Holle J, Freilinger G (1984) Improvement of continence by myoplasty of the pelvic floor. Prog Pediatr Surg 17: 123–130

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Inoue Y, Taylor GI (1996) The angiosomes of the forearm: anatomic study and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 98: 195–210

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lanz J, Wachsmuth W (1972) Praktische Anatomie, I/4 Bein und Statik, 2edn. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 207–211

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lüscher NJ (1989) Decubitalulzera der Beckenregion: Diagnostik und chirurgische Therapie Band 33. Verlag Hans Huber, Bern, pp 110–115

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mathes SJ, Nahai F (1981) Classification of the vascular anatomy of muscles: Experimental and clinical correlation. Plast Reconstr Surg 67: 177–187

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McCraw JB, Arnold PG (1986) McCraw and Arnold's atlas of muscles and musculocutaneous flaps. Hampton Press, Norfolk, p 378

    Google Scholar 

  15. Millesi H (1991) Microsurgical repair of peripheral nerves. In: Smith JW, Aston JS (eds) Grabb and Smith's Plastic surgery, 3rd edn. Little, Brown and Co, Boston, pp 1059

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pickrell KL, Broadbent TR, Masters FW, Metzger JT (1952) Construction of a rectal sphincter and restoration of anal continence by transplanting the gracilis muscle. Ann Surg 135: 853–862

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Seccia M, Menconi C, Balestri R, Cavina E (1994) Study protocols and functional results in 86 electrostimulated graciloplasties. Dis Colon Rectum 37: 897–904

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shanahan DAP, George B, Williams NS, Sinnatamby CS, Riches DJ (1993) The long head of the biceps femoris: Anatomic basis for its possible use in the construction of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter. Plast Reconstr Surg 92: 55–58

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. State D, Katz A (1955) The use of superficial transverse perineal muscles in the treatment of post surgical anal incontinence. Ann Surg 112: 262–265

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sunderland S (1978) Nerves and nerve injuries. Peripheral nerve trunks, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 31–37

    Google Scholar 

  21. Taylor GI, Palmer JH (1987) The vascular territories (angiosomes) of the body: Experimental study and clinical application. Br J Plast Surg 40: 113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Waldeyer A, Mayet A (1987) Anatomie des Menschen 1, 15th edn. Verlag Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 428–433

    Google Scholar 

  23. Williams PL, Warwick R, Dyson M, Bannister LH (1989) Gray's Anatomy, 37th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 783–784

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rab, M., Mader, N., Kamolz, L.P. et al. Basic anatomical investigation of semitendinosus and the long head of biceps femoris muscle for their possible use in electrically stimulated neosphincter formation. Surg Radiol Anat 19, 287–291 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01637592

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01637592

Key words

Navigation