Skip to main content
Log in

Letter

  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pearson J, Dequeker J, Henley M, et al. European semi-anthropomorphic spine phantom for the calibration of bone densitometers: assessment of precision, stability and accuracy. Osteoporosis Int 1995;5:174–84.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tothill P. Cross-calibration of DXA scanners for spine measurements. Osteoporosis Int 1995;5:410–11.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tothill P, Fenner JAK, Reid DM. Comparisons between three dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring spine and femur. Br J Radiol 1995;68:621–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Svendsen OL, Hassager C, Skodt V, Christiansen C. Impact of soft tissue on in vivo accuracy of bone mineral measurements in the spine, hip and forearm: a human cadaver study. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:868–73.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Formica C, Loro M-L, Gilsanz V, Seeman E. Inhomogeneity in body fat distribution may result in inaccuracy in the measurement of vertebral bone mass. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:1504–11.

    Google Scholar 

  6. O'Neill TW, Varlow J, Felsenberg D, et al. Variation in vertebral height ratios in population studies. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:1895–907.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lunt M, Adams J, Benevolenskaya L, et al. Bone density varies between eleven populations participating in the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:S129.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Silman AJ, on behalf of the European Vertebral Osteoporosis (EVOS) Group. The European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study (EVOS). In: Christiansen C, Riis B, editors. Osteoporosis: Proceedings of the IVth international symposium on osteoporosis and consensus development, Hong Kong, 1993:65–6.

  9. WHO. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Technical report series 843. Geneva: WHO, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dequeker J, Pearson J, Reeve J, et al. Dual X-ray absorptio-metry: cross-calibration and normative reference ranges for the spine. Results of a European Community Concerned Action. Bone 1995;17:247–54.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kalender WA, Felsenberg D, Genant HK, et al. The European Spine Phantom: a tool for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by DXA and QCT. Eur J Radiol 1995;20:83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pearson J, Dequeker J, Reeve J, et al. Dual X-ray absorptiometry of the proximal femur: normal European values standardised with the European Spine Phantom. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:315–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reeve, J., Lunt, M., Kalender, W. et al. Letter. Osteoporosis Int 6, 183–184 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01623945

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01623945

Navigation