Int J Angiol 1999; 8(3): 147-149
DOI: 10.1007/BF01616442
Original Articles

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

A comparison of safety and efficacy of sublingual captopril with sublingual nifedipine in hypertensive crisis

Kani Gemici, Yüksel Karakoç, Alpaslan Ersoy, Ibrahim Baran, Sümeyye Güllülü, Jale Cordan
  • University of Uludag, School of Medicine, Departments of Cardiology and Emergency, Bursa, Turkey
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
24 April 2011 (online)

Abstract

Sublingual nifedipine is commonly used in hypertensive crisis, however, it may result in several adverse effects such as reflex tachycardia, headache, and flushing. Research is continuing to find a new drug that has the same efficiency and fewer side effects. Sublingual captopril, a new preparation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, lowers blood pressure. It is not known whether it is effective in these emergent clinical settings. Therefore we designed a randomized, double-blind study to compare the efficacy and safety of those two drugs in hypertensive crisis. Eighty patients (32 male and 48 female) with hypertensive crisis were included in the study; their mean age was 43.4 ± 7.9 years. Nifedipine 10 mg was given sublingually to 34 and captopril 25 mg to 46 patients randomly. There was no difference between the two drugs with respect to their antihypertensive effect. Heart rate significantly dropped (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001) in the patients taking captopril, but no changes were observed in the patients taking nifedipine. Twenty-three of 34 patients taking nifedipine encountered adverse effects. Adverse effects were observed in only three patients taking captopril (p < 0.001). Sublingual captopril is as effective as and has less side effects than sublingual nifedipine. Because sublingual captopril has fewer side effects, it may be safer than nifedipine in the treatment of hypertensive crisis.

    >